Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2020 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 4

3-Dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution of dental implants on the bone tissue around the neck region of the implant and on the implant surface with respect to bone density

Pages
1252–1257
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Vertical and oblique (30°angled) forces of 300 N were applied to all models and the results were evaluated by finite element analysis.Results: The results show that both vertical and oblique forces on the implants and placement of abutments in the flat and oblique position caused tension in the bone around the neck of the implant and the implant surface.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:AbstractAim: The aim of this study was to investigate the maximum Von Misses stress values of implants with different diameters in patients with different bone densities depending on the forces that are applied with different angles to the bone around the implant neck and implant surface, by using finite element analysis method.Material and Methods: 3.8 mm and 4.6 mm diameter dental implants of an implant system that had an in vitro laser-microtextured neck design were used in this study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Computational models were generated for implants with different diameters which were placed in the maxillary and mandibular 1st molar teeth using flat and oblique (20°angled) abutments.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Vertical and oblique (30°angled) forces of 300 N were applied to all models and the results were evaluated by finite element analysis.Results: The results show that both vertical and oblique forces on the implants and placement of abutments in the flat and oblique position caused tension in the bone around the neck of the implant and the implant surface.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

AbstractAim: The aim of this study was to investigate the maximum Von Misses stress values of implants with different diameters in patients with different bone densities depending on the forces that are applied with different angles to the bone around the implant neck and implant surface, by using finite element analysis method.Material and Methods: 3.8 mm and 4.6 mm diameter dental implants of an implant system that had an in vitro laser-microtextured neck design were used in this study. Computational models were generated for implants with different diameters which were placed in the maxillary and mandibular 1st molar teeth using flat and oblique (20°angled) abutments. Vertical and oblique (30°angled) forces of 300 N were applied to all models and the results were evaluated by finite element analysis.Results: The results show that both vertical and oblique forces on the implants and placement of abutments in the flat and oblique position caused tension in the bone around the neck of the implant and the implant surface. When the oblique and vertical loads applied to the bone models were compared, the forces applied in the oblique direction exhibited a significant increase of Von Misses stress values in the cortical bone around the crest module of the implant compared to the other group. In our study, the minimum stress distribution with respect to the direction of the applied forces and placement positions of the abutments was obtained by applying the implant and the force in the same direction (abutment straight, force vertical). However, in the groups with the angled application of the force direction and the angled placement position of the abutments, the maximum Von Misses stress valueincreased in the bone around the implant neck and implant surface.Conclusion: Placing the implants at the right angle and within bone tissues with adequate cortical bone density around the implant will ensure minimal stress values on both the supporting bone and the implant surface.

🔖

Cite This Article

BEKTAS, A. C., GULSUN, B. (2022). 3-Dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution of dental implants on the bone tissue around the neck region of the implant and on the implant surface with respect to bone density. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 4, 1252–1257. https://ajindex.com/articles/446532

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Branemark PI. Osseointegration and its experimental background. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:399-410
  2. Akagawa Y, Sato Y, Teixeira ER, et al. A mimic osseointegrated implant model for three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Oral Rehabil 2003;30:41-5
  3. Neldam CA, Pinholt EM. State of the art of short dental implants: a systematic review of the literature. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012;14:622-32
  4. Nevins M, Nevins ML, Camelo M, et al.Human histologic evidence of a connective tissue attachment to a dental implant. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2008;28:111-21
  5. Botos S, Yousef H, Zweig B, et al. The effects of laser microtexturing of the dental implant collar on crestal bone levels and peri-implant health. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26:492-8
  6. Pecora GE, Ceccarelli R, Bonelli M, et al. Clinical evaluation of laser microtexturing for soft tissue and bone attachment to dental implants. Implant Dent 2009;18:57-66
  7. Farah JW, Craig RG, Meroueh KA. Finite element analysis of a mandibuler mode. J Oral Rehabil 1988;15:615-24
  8. Torcato LB, Pellizzer EP, Verri FR, et al. Influence of parafunctional loading and prosthetic connection on stress distribution: a 3D finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114:644-51
  9. Clift SE, Fisher J, Watson CJ. Finite element stress and strain analysis of the bone surrounding a dental implant: effect of variations in bone modulus. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 1992;206:233-41
  10. Magne P. Efficient 3D finite element analysis of dental restorative procedures using micro-CT data. Dent Mater 2007;23:539-48
  11. Baggi L, Cappelloni I, Di Girolamo M, et al. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2008;100:422-31
  12. Cibirka RM, Razzoog ME, Lang BR, et al. Determining the force absorbtion quotient for restorative materials used in implant occlusal surfaces. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:361-4
  13. Papavasiliou G, Kamposiora P, Bayne SC, et al. 3D-FEA of osseointegration percentages and patterns on implant-bone interfacial stresses. J Dent 1997:25:485-91
  14. Hojjatie B, Anusavice KJ. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of glass-ceramic dental crowns. J Biomech 1990;23:1157-66
  15. Bishara SE, Saunders WB. Textbook of orthodontics. Saunders Book Company, 15st Edition, Philadelphia, 2001;592
  16. Isidor F. Loss of osseointegration caused by occlusal load of ora