Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2020 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 12

Clinical and functional results of patients after arthroscopic single row rotator cuff repair and arthroscopic acromioplasty

Pages
3201–3206
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally, while patients’ preoperative mean abduction ROM was 60.73°±1.31°, it increased to 126.22°±2.27° in the postoperative period.Conclusion: Arthroscopic single row rotator cuff repair and arthroscopic acromioplasty in patients suffering from RCT contributes to significant relief of pain and remarkable increase in shoulder abduction ROM, thus offering an effective and reliable surgical treatment which allows the active use of extremities.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The present study aims to evaluate clinical and functional results of arthroscopic single row rotator cuff repair and acromioplasty in patients with Rotator cuff tears (RCT).Materials and Methods: Sixty one patients whom were applied arthroscopic single row rotator cuff repair and arthroscopic acromioplasty between 2016 and 2019 were included in the present study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In addition, patients’ Constant Murley Scores, Shoulder Range of Motion (ROM) and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores were also analyzed prior to and following the surgical operation.Results: Forty one (67.2%) out of 61 patients in the present study were applied surgery on the right shoulders, while 20 of them (32.8%) were applied surgery on the left shoulders.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally, while patients’ preoperative mean abduction ROM was 60.73°±1.31°, it increased to 126.22°±2.27° in the postoperative period.Conclusion: Arthroscopic single row rotator cuff repair and arthroscopic acromioplasty in patients suffering from RCT contributes to significant relief of pain and remarkable increase in shoulder abduction ROM, thus offering an effective and reliable surgical treatment which allows the active use of extremities.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The present study aims to evaluate clinical and functional results of arthroscopic single row rotator cuff repair and acromioplasty in patients with Rotator cuff tears (RCT).Materials and Methods: Sixty one patients whom were applied arthroscopic single row rotator cuff repair and arthroscopic acromioplasty between 2016 and 2019 were included in the present study. Patients’ rotator cuff tears (Patte classification) and acromion were classified based on X-ray and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) results. In addition, patients’ Constant Murley Scores, Shoulder Range of Motion (ROM) and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores were also analyzed prior to and following the surgical operation.Results: Forty one (67.2%) out of 61 patients in the present study were applied surgery on the right shoulders, while 20 of them (32.8%) were applied surgery on the left shoulders. Twenty one (34.4%) of patients were male, while 40 (65.6%) of them were female. Patients were divided into three groups as type 1 (n=10), type 2 (n=41), type 3 (n=10) based on their acromion classification and three stages as stage 1 (n= 15), stage 2 (n=36), and stage 3 (n=10) based on their rotator cuff tears. In addition, while their mean preoperative Constant-Murley and VAS scores were 29.8±0.79 and 9.14±0.11, respectively, it increased to 81.1±1.07 and decreased to 2.06±1.07 in the postoperative period, respectively. Finally, while patients’ preoperative mean abduction ROM was 60.73°±1.31°, it increased to 126.22°±2.27° in the postoperative period.Conclusion: Arthroscopic single row rotator cuff repair and arthroscopic acromioplasty in patients suffering from RCT contributes to significant relief of pain and remarkable increase in shoulder abduction ROM, thus offering an effective and reliable surgical treatment which allows the active use of extremities.

🔖

Cite This Article

TOPAK, D., KUŞCU, B., DOĞAR, F., ÖKKEŞ, B., TEMİZ, A., VATANSEVER, F. (2022). Clinical and functional results of patients after arthroscopic single row rotator cuff repair and arthroscopic acromioplasty. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 12, 3201–3206. https://ajindex.com/articles/446520

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Getz CL, Buzzell JE, Krishnan SG. Shoulder Instability and Rotator Cuff Tears. In: Flynn JM, eds. Orthopaedic Knowledge Update 10. Tenth edition. Rosemont: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 2011;299-315
  2. Bunker T. Rotator Cuff Disease. Current Orthopaedics 2002;16:223-33
  3. Tempelhof S, Rupp S, Seil R. Age-related prevalence of rotator cuff tears in asymptomatic shoulders. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1999;8:296-9
  4. Yamaguchi K, Ditsios K, Middleton WD, et al. The demographic and morphological features of rotator cuff disease. A comparison of asymptomatic and symptomatic shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006;88:1699-704
  5. Romeo AA, Hang DW, Bach BR Jr, et al. Repair of full thick¬ness rotator cuff tears. Gender, age, and other factors affect¬ing outcome. Clin Orthop 1999; 367:243-55
  6. Baysal D, Balyk R, Otto D. Functional outcome and health-related quality of life after surgical repairof full-thickness rotator cuff tear using a mini-open technique. Am J Sports Med 2005;13:46-55
  7. Neer CS, Marberry TA. On the disadvantages of radical ac¬romionectomy. J Bone Joint Surg 1981;63:41-69
  8. Gartsman GM, Khan M, Hammerman SM. Arthroscopic repair of full-thickness tears of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998;80:832-40
  9. Haneveld H, Hug K, Diederichs G, et al. Arthroscopic double-row repair of the rotator cuff: a comparison of bio obsorbable and non-resorbable anchors regarding os¬seous reaction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013;7:1647-54
  10. Kijima H, Minagawa H, Nishi T, et al. Long-term followup of cases of rotator cuff tear treated conservatively. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2012;21:491-4
  11. Maman E, Harris C, White L, et al. Outcome of nonoperative treatment of symptomatic rotator cuff tears monitored by magnetic resonance imaging. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009;91:1898-906
  12. Van der Zwaal P, Thomassen BJ, Nieuwenhuijse MJ, et al. Clinical outcome in all-arthroscopic versus miniopen rota¬tor cuff repair in small to medium-sized tears: A random¬ized controlled trial in 100 patients with 1-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 2013;29:266-73
  13. Burkhart SS, Lo IK. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2006;14:333-46
  14. Sevimli R, Aslanturk O, Ergen E, et al. Mid-Term Outcomes of Arthroscopic Treatment in Patients with a Stiff Elbow. Cureus 2018;10:2630-37 15. Nutton RW, McBirnie JM, Phillips C. Treatment of chronic rotatorcuff impingement by arthroscopic subacromial decompression. J Bone Joint Surg 1997;79:73-6
  15. McLaugh