SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2020 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 2

Comparison of full and ministernotomy for isolated aortic valve replacement in elderly patients; a prospective randomized study

Doğan KAHRAMAN
Çağın ZAİM
Pages
576–581
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, the ministernotomy group had an average of 3 hours lessmechanical ventilation time (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: To compare the results of isolated aortic valve replacement through ministernotomy and full sternotomy in the elderly.Material and Methods: This single-center prospective study includes patients over 60 years of age who undergone isolated aorticvalve replacement either by upper ministernotomy (22 patients) or full sternotomy (22 patients) during 5 years.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Both groups werefollowed 12 months postoperatively.Results: All preoperative and operative measures were similar.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, the ministernotomy group had an average of 3 hours lessmechanical ventilation time (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: To compare the results of isolated aortic valve replacement through ministernotomy and full sternotomy in the elderly.Material and Methods: This single-center prospective study includes patients over 60 years of age who undergone isolated aorticvalve replacement either by upper ministernotomy (22 patients) or full sternotomy (22 patients) during 5 years. Both groups werefollowed 12 months postoperatively.Results: All preoperative and operative measures were similar. However, the ministernotomy group had an average of 3 hours lessmechanical ventilation time (p

🔖

Cite This Article

KAHRAMAN, D., ZAİM, Ç. (2022). Comparison of full and ministernotomy for isolated aortic valve replacement in elderly patients; a prospective randomized study. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 2, 576–581. https://ajindex.com/articles/446437

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Concistre G, Bianchi G, Chiaramonti F, et al. Minimally Invasive Sutureless Aortic Valve Replacement is Associated With Improved Outcomes in Patients With Left Ventricular Dysfunction. Innovations 2019;14:445-52
  2. Corbi P, Rahmati M, Donal E, et al. Prospective comparison of minimally invasive and standard techniques for aortic valve replacement: Initial experience in the first hundred patients. J Cardiac Surg 2003;18:133-9
  3. Yilmaz A, Rehman A, Sonker U, et al. Minimal Access Aortic Valve Replacement Using a Minimal Extracorporeal Circulatory System. Ann Thorac Surg 2009;87:720-5
  4. Tosu AR, Cinar T, Guler A, et al. The predictive value of platelet to lymphocyte ratio for procedural complications and mid-term mortality in aortic stenosis patients who underwent a transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Ann Med Res 2019;26:537-41
  5. Brown ML, McKellar SH, Sundt TM, et al. Ministernotomy versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thorac Cardiov Sur 2009;137:670-9
  6. Dalen M, Biancari F, Rubino AS, et al. Ministernotomy Versus Full Sternotomy Aortic Valve Replacement With a Sutureless Bioprosthesis: A Multicenter Study. Ann Thorac Surg 2015;99:524-30
  7. Dalen M, Biancari F, Rubino AS, et al. Aortic valve replacement through full sternotomy with a stented bioprosthesis versus minimally invasive sternotomy with a sutureless bioprosthesis. Eur J Cardio-Thorac 2016;49:220-7
  8. Detter C, Deuse T, Boehm DH, et al. Midterm results and quality of life after minimally invasive vs. conventional aortic valve replacement. Thorac Cardiov Surg 2002;50:337-41
  9. Filip G, Bryndza MA, Konstanty-Kalandyk J, et al. Ministernotomy or sternotomy in isolated aortic valve replacement? Early results. Kardiochir Torakochi 2018;15:213-8
  10. Burdett CL, Lage IB, Goodwin AT, et al. Manubriumlimited sternotomy decreases blood loss after aortic valve replacement surgery. Interact Cardiov Th 2014;19:605-10
  11. Chang C, Raza S, Altarabsheh SE, et al. Minimally Invasive Approaches to Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: A Meta-Analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 2018;106:1881-9
  12. Fudulu D, Lewis H, Benedetto U, et al. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement in high risk patient groups. J Thorac Dis 2017;9:1672-96
  13. Sharony R, Grossi EA, Saunders PC, et al. Minimally invasive aortic valve surgery in the elderly: a casecontrol study. Circulation 2003;108:43-7
  14. Stolinski J, Plicner D, Gaweda B, et al. Function of the R