Recovery time in polypropylene group (9.9±1.3 weeks) was shorter than silk seton group (12.7±2.7 weeks) (p
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Treatment of complex anal fistula is a challenging task due to the risk of recurrence and development of incontinence and there is no consensus over how to treat this condition.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Demographic characteristics, duration of hospital stay, duration of operation, duration between two operations in patients requiring second operation, time to healing, recurrence, pain assessment by using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) during follow-up exams and gas and/or stool incontinence of patients with complex anal fistula diagnosis who were treated by loose silk or tightenable polypropylene seton between March 2017 and March 2019 in our clinic were examined.Results: In this study, 81 (86.2%) male and 13 (13.8%) female patients with a total of 94 were included.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Recovery time in polypropylene group (9.9±1.3 weeks) was shorter than silk seton group (12.7±2.7 weeks) (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters
Abstract
Aim: Treatment of complex anal fistula is a challenging task due to the risk of recurrence and development of incontinence and there is no consensus over how to treat this condition. We aimed to compare the results in our patients whom we have applied loose silk or tightenable polypropylene seton. Materials and Methods: Demographic characteristics, duration of hospital stay, duration of operation, duration between two operations in patients requiring second operation, time to healing, recurrence, pain assessment by using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) during follow-up exams and gas and/or stool incontinence of patients with complex anal fistula diagnosis who were treated by loose silk or tightenable polypropylene seton between March 2017 and March 2019 in our clinic were examined.Results: In this study, 81 (86.2%) male and 13 (13.8%) female patients with a total of 94 were included. In 58 (61.7%) of these patients polypropylene and in 36 (38.3%) silk seton was used. The mean age of the patients was 42.5±12.1 years. Mean follow-up was 17.2±6.5 months. Recovery time in polypropylene group (9.9±1.3 weeks) was shorter than silk seton group (12.7±2.7 weeks) (p
🔖
Cite This Article
ÇELİK, Y., BULDANLI, M. Z. (2022). Comparison of loose silk and tightenable polypropylene seton placement in treatment of complex anal fistula. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 2, 376–380. https://ajindex.com/articles/446357
Sugrue J, Nordenstam J, Abcarian H, et al. Pathogenesis and persistence of cryptoglandular anal fistula: A systematic review. Tech Coloproctol 2017;21:425-32
Parks A, Gordon PH, Hardcastle J. A classification of fistula-in-ano. Br J Surg 1976;63:1-12
Kristo I, Stift A, Staud C, et al. The type of loose seton for complex anal fistula is essential to improve perianal comfort and quality of life. Colorectal Dis 2016;18:194-8
Michalopoulos A, Papadopoulos V, Tziris Ν, et al. Perianal fistulas. Tech Coloproctol 2010;14:15-7
Zhao B, Wang Z, Han J, et al. Long-term outcomes of ligation of the inter-sphincteric fistula tract plus bioprosthetic anal fistula plug (LIFT-Plug) in the treatment of trans-sphincteric perianal fistula. Med Sci Monit 2019;25:1350-4
De la Portilla F, Muñoz-Cruzado MVD, Maestre MV, et al. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) versus fibrin glue in cryptogenic fistula-in-ano: a phase III single-center, randomized, double-blind trial. Int J Colorectal Dis 2019;34:1113-9
Gurer A, Ozlem N, Gokakin AK, et al. A novel material in seton treatment of fistula-in-ano. Am J Surg 2007;193:794-6
Pommaret E, Benfredj P, Soudan D, et al. Sphinctersparing techniques for fistulas-in-ano. J Visc Surg 2015;152:31-6
McCourtney J, Finlay I. Setons in the surgical management of fistula in ano. Br J Surg 1995;82:448- 52
Rosen D, Kaiser A. Definitive seton management for transsphincteric fistula-in-ano: Harm or charm? Colorectal Dis 2016;18:488-95
Owen H, Buchanan G, Schizas A, et al. Quality of life with anal fistula. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2016;98:334-8
Limura E, Giordano P. Modern management of anal fistula. World J Gastroenterol 2015;21:12-20
Ege B, Leventoğlu S, Menteş B, et al. Hybrid seton for the treatment of high anal fistulas: results of 128 consecutive patients. Tech Coloproctol 2014;18:187- 93
Akiba RT, Rodrigues FG, da Silva G. Management of complex perineal fistula disease. Clin Colon Rectal Sur 2016;29:92-100
Garg P. A new understanding of the principles in the management of complex anal fistula. Med Hypotheses 2019;132:109329
Patton V, Chen CM, Lubowski D. Long-term results of the cutting seton for high anal fistula. ANZ J Surg 2015;85:720-7
Bektasoglu HK, Kunduz E. Elastic seton placement in treatment of complex anal fistula: Analysis of 44 patients. Turk J Colorectal Dis 2018;28:18-21
Emile SH, Elfeki H, Thabet W, et al. Predictive factors for recurrence of high transsphincteric an