Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2020 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 4

Full cup test (FCT) for symptom severity assessment in carpal tunnel syndrome/comparing scores with clinical and neurophysiological findings

Pages
1263–1267
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The score of FCT was significantlycorrelated with SSS and the FSS (r=0.60 p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:AbstractAim: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a compression neuropathy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study was planned to evaluate of full cup test (FCT) to demonstrate symptom severity in CTS and investigate the relationship between FCT and EDX.Material and Methods: This study included patients with idiopathic CTS.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The score of FCT was significantlycorrelated with SSS and the FSS (r=0.60 p
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

AbstractAim: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a compression neuropathy. There is neuropathic pain in the clinic. Treatment is planned according to electrodiagnostic testing (EDX) and symptom severity. This study was planned to evaluate of full cup test (FCT) to demonstrate symptom severity in CTS and investigate the relationship between FCT and EDX.Material and Methods: This study included patients with idiopathic CTS. The self-administered Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (BCTQ) and FCT were used to determine the severity of clinical symptoms. The severity of CTS was classified as mild, moderate and severe according to EDX.Results: A total of 97 hands (55 right, 42 left) were evaluated. 29 patients had bilateral symptoms. The severity of CTS was 51.5% mild, 44.3% moderate, and 4.1% severe. The mean FCT score was 51.13 ± 20.80 (min: 6.6-max: 100). The mean symptom severity scale (SSS) of the BCTQ was 24.25 ± 7 and the functional severity scale (FSS) was 13.26 ± 4.55. The score of FCT was significantlycorrelated with SSS and the FSS (r=0.60 p

🔖

Cite This Article

KESKİN, E. D., SAY, B., ERGUN, U., AGİR, H., KARACA, G. (2022). Full cup test (FCT) for symptom severity assessment in carpal tunnel syndrome/comparing scores with clinical and neurophysiological findings. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 4, 1263–1267. https://ajindex.com/articles/446341

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Padua L, Coraci D, Erra C, et al. Carpal tunnel syndrome: clinical features, diagnosis, and management. Lancet Neurol 2016;15:1273-84
  2. P Dec, A Zyluk. Bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome – a review. Neurol Neurochir Pol 2018;52:79-83
  3. Levine DW, Simmons BP, Koris MJ, et al. A selfadministered questionnaire for the assessment of severity of symptoms and functional status in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993;75:1585- 92
  4. Ergun U, Say B, Ozer G, et al. Trial of a new pain assessment tool in patients with low education: the full cup test. Int J Clin Pract 2007;61:1692-6
  5. Werner RA, Andary M. Electrodiagnostic evaluation of carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 2011;44:597- 607
  6. IBM Corp. Released 2011. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp
  7. Leite JC, Jerosch-Herold C, Song F. A systematic review of the psychometric properties of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2006:20;7:78
  8. Sezgin M, Incel NA, Serhan S, et al. Assessment of symptom severity and functional status in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: reliability and functionality of the Turkish version of the Boston Questionnaire. Disabil Rehabil 2006;28:1281-5
  9. Guyatt GH. A taxonomy of health status instruments. J Rheumatol 1995;22:1188-90
  10. Zambelis T, Tsivgoulis G, Karandreas N. Carpal tunnel syndrome: associations between risk factors and laterality. Eur Neurol 2010;63:43-7
  11. Reinstein L. Hand dominance in carpal tunnel syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1981;62:202-3
  12. Mattos Feijó L, Tarman GZ, Fontaine C, Harrison R, Johnstone T, Salomons T. Sex-Specific Effects of Gender Identification on Pain Study Recruitment. J Pain 2018;19:178-85
  13. Roizenblatt M, Rosa Neto NS, Tufik S, et al. Painrelated diseases and sleep disorders. Braz J Med Biol Res 2012;45:792-8
  14. Zilliox LA. Neuropathic Pain. Continuum (Minneap Minn) 2017;23:512-32
  15. Jensen MP, Karoly P, Braver S. The measurement of clinical pain intensity: A comparison of six methods. Pain 1986;27:117–26
  16. Jensen M, Karoly P. Self-report scales and procedures for assessing pain in adults. In: Turk DC, Melzack R, editors., editors. Handbook of pain assessment. Vol. 2 New York: Guilford Press 1992:135-51
  17. Williamson A, Hoggart B. Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales. Clin Nurs 2005;4: 798-804
  18. You H Simmons Z, Freivalds A, Kothari MJ, et al. Relationships between clinical symptom severity scales and nerve conduc