SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2020 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 11

Analysis of chippaux smirak index on dynamic balance scores

Davut ÖZBAĞ
Deniz ŞENOL
Damla BİLGE
Beyza ÖZDEMİR
Şeyma TOY
Pages
2904–2910
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Overall (OA), anterior-posterior (AP) and medial-lateral(ML) dynamic balance assessments of the participants were made with eyes open.Results: According to Mann Whitney U analysis results, statistically significant difference was found between MFW, MMFW, LoFA,HW and FL parameters of men and women in both feet (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of this study is to examine whether Chippaux Smirak Index (CSI) calculated from footprint and measurements takenfrom foot have an effect on balance scores.Materials and Methods: 61volunteers (25 males, 36 females) between the ages of 18 and 24 were included in our study and 122feet were measured.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Individuals withCSI >62.70% were considered as flatfooted and excluded from the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Overall (OA), anterior-posterior (AP) and medial-lateral(ML) dynamic balance assessments of the participants were made with eyes open.Results: According to Mann Whitney U analysis results, statistically significant difference was found between MFW, MMFW, LoFA,HW and FL parameters of men and women in both feet (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study is to examine whether Chippaux Smirak Index (CSI) calculated from footprint and measurements takenfrom foot have an effect on balance scores.Materials and Methods: 61volunteers (25 males, 36 females) between the ages of 18 and 24 were included in our study and 122feet were measured. Footprints of the participants were taken by using Harris imprint. Footprints were scanned, the parameterswere measured with Digimizer program and CSI was calculated. Metatarsal foot width (MFW), maximum metatarsal foot width(MMFW), length of the foot (LoFA), heel width (HW) and foot length (FL) taken from footprints were measured. Individuals withCSI >62.70% were considered as flatfooted and excluded from the study. Dynamic balance measurements were made with BiodexBalance System (BBS) (Biodex Medical Systems, Shirley, 2000, New York). Overall (OA), anterior-posterior (AP) and medial-lateral(ML) dynamic balance assessments of the participants were made with eyes open.Results: According to Mann Whitney U analysis results, statistically significant difference was found between MFW, MMFW, LoFA,HW and FL parameters of men and women in both feet (p

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZBAĞ, D., ŞENOL, D., BİLGE, D., ÖZDEMİR, B., TOY, Ş. (2022). Analysis of chippaux smirak index on dynamic balance scores. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 11, 2904–2910. https://ajindex.com/articles/446315

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. De Morais Barbosa C, Barros Bértolo M, Zonzini Gaino J, et al. The effect of flat and textured insoles on the balance of primary care elderly people: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Interv Aging 2018;13:277- 84
  2. Şahan AK, Sağlıklı bireylerde ayak bileğine uygulanan bantlama yönteminin dengeye akut etkisi, Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Pamukkale Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Fizik Tedavi ve Rehabilitasyon Anabilim Dalı, Ocak 2018
  3. Büyükturan Ö, Büyükturan B, Karartı C. Sağlıklı Genç Yetişkinlerde Pes Planus ile Ağrı, Hipermobilite ve Denge Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi. FÜ Sağ Bil Tıp Derg 2017;31:33-7
  4. Forriol F, Pascual J. Footprint Analysis Between Three and Seventeen Years of Age. Foot & Ankle 1990;11:101-4
  5. Cavanagh PR, Rodgers MM. The arch index: a useful measure from footprints. J Biomech 1987;20:547-51
  6. Fascione JM, Crews RT, Wrobel JS. Dynamic Footprint Measurement Collection Technique and Intrarater Reliability. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2012;102:130-8
  7. Ritzmann R, Freyler K, Weltin E, et al. Load Dependency of Postural Control - Kinematic and Neuromuscular Changes in Response to over and under Load Conditions. PLoS One 2015;10:e0128400
  8. Ambegaonkar JP, Caswell SV, Winchester JB, et al. Balance Comparisons Between Female Dancers and Active Nondancers. Res Q Exerc Sport 2013;84:24-9
  9. Zararsız U, Takinacı ZD. Evaluation of static balance in university students with and without pes planus. J Health Pro Res 2019;1:8-12
  10. Kabak B, Kocahan T, Akinoglu B et al. Does pes planus influence balance performance in athletes? Turk J Sports Med 2019;54:195-201
  11. De Morais Barbosa C, Barros Bértolo M, Zonzini Gaino J, et al. The effect of flat and textured insoles on the balance of primary care elderly people: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Interv Aging 2018;13:277- 84
  12. Tsuyama K, Hoshiba A, Nakajim H. An agerelated change in dynamic balance ability and the relationship between dynamic balance ability and isometric knee extension strength -Females from 20 to 85 years old who regularly practiced at gymnastics club. Japanese J Phys Fit Sports Med 2012;61:131-7
  13. Ünlüsoy D, Aydoğ E, Tuncay R, et al. Postural Balance in Women with Osteoporosis and Effective Factors. Turk J Osteoporos 2011;17:37-43
  14. Agnihotri AK, Shukla SM, Purwar B. Determination of sex from the foot measurements. J Forensic Med 2006;2:1-4
  15. Chiroma S.M, Philip J, Attah O.O, Dibal N.I. Comparison of the Foot Height, Length, B