Identifying clinical indicators in orthopedic oncology provides accurate analysis of data and improvesthe quality of health care in sarcoma patients.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Clinical quality studies basically aim to improve the quality of health care and therefore to provide health care services ofthe same quality throughout the country.
📊
Key Findings & Data:These studies of great importance in terms of obtaining the correct data from thesystem, performing the analyzes correctly, and identifying the areas open to improvement correctly.Criteria for clinical quality care standards and indicators.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Identifying clinical indicators in orthopedic oncology provides accurate analysis of data and improvesthe quality of health care in sarcoma patients.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters
Abstract
Clinical quality studies basically aim to improve the quality of health care and therefore to provide health care services ofthe same quality throughout the country. These studies of great importance in terms of obtaining the correct data from thesystem, performing the analyzes correctly, and identifying the areas open to improvement correctly.Criteria for clinical quality care standards and indicators. Clinical indicators are used to measure and quantify the safety andquality of patient care. Identifying clinical indicators in orthopedic oncology provides accurate analysis of data and improvesthe quality of health care in sarcoma patients.
🔖
Cite This Article
ÖZTÜRK, R., GÜNGÖR, B. Ş., BULUT, E. K., DOĞAN, H., DUMAN, E. M., COŞKUN, Z. Z., AVCI, K. (2022). Clinical quality studies in orthopedic oncology and centers of excellence. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 6, 1839–1843. https://ajindex.com/articles/446301
Torun P, Kutlar A. Economic Costs of The Cancer: A Computable General Equilibrium Model Approach. Hacettepe J Health Administration, 2018;21:87-101
Makary MA, Daniel M. Medical error-the third leading cause of death in the US. BMJ 2016;3:2139
Fehrenbach MJ. Dental hygiene education [Internet]. [Place unknown]: Fehrenbach and Associates; 2000 [updated 2009 May 2; cited 2009 Jun 15]. Available from:
High - Expenditure Part B Drugs [Internet]. [Place unknown] 2009[ updated 2009 Jan 18; cited 2020 jan 18] Available from: https://www.gao.gov/ assets/650/649459.pdf
Avcı K. Kalite ve Akreditasyona Teorik Bir Bakış. In Beylik U, Avcı K, eds. Sağlıkta Kalite Yönetimi ve Akreditasyon. Ankara: Gazi Kitapevi 2019;1-6
Centers for medicare and medicaid services[Internet]. [Place unknown] [cited 2020 jan 18] Available from:
Koç EM, Aksoy H. Klinik Kalite. In Beylik U, Avcı K, Eds. Sağlıkta Kalite Yönetimi ve Akreditasyon. Ankara: Gazi Kitapevi 2019;1-16
Avcı K, Şenel ÇF. Sağlık Hizmetleri Akreditasyonu: Faydası, Önemi ve Etkisi Nedir? Online Türk Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 2019;4;221-34
T.C. Ministry of Health, Clinical Quality Implementation and Data Quality Improvement Guide. [Internet]. [Place unknown] [updated 2017, cited 2020 Jan 18] Available from: https://kalite.saglik.gov.tr/TR,25083/ klinik-kalite-olcme-ve-degerlendirme-rehberleri. HTML
Avcı K. Sağlık hizmet kalitesinin iyileştirilmesi için klinik kalite ölçümü, Health Care Acad J 2017;4:181- 5
Bampoe S, Cook T, Fleisher L, et al. Clinical indicators for reporting the effectiveness of patient quality and safety-related interventions: a protocol of a systematic review and Delphi consensus process as part of the international Standardised Endpoints for Perioperative Medicine initiative (StEP). BMJ 2018;2;8:023427
National Director of Quality and Patient Safety. [Internet]. [Place unknown]: 2013 A Practical Guide to Clinical Audit [updated 2017 Sep 16; cited 2020 Jan 18]. Available from: Who/QID/MeasurementQuality/ Clinical-Audit/ practicalguideclaudit 2013.pdf 14. Amare G. Reviewing the Values of a Standard Operating Procedure. Ethiop J Health Sci 2012;22: 205-8
Ozturk R, Arikan SM, Bulut EK, et al. Distribution and evaluation of bone and soft tissue tumors operated in a tertiary care cent