SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2021 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 4

Evaluation of the maxillary sinus volume and dimensionsin different skeletal classes using cone beam computedtomography

Fatma Ezgi CAN
Meryem ETÖZ
Firdevs AŞANTOĞROL
Kübra Gülnur TOPSAKAL
Pages
709–715
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: Although no statistical difference was observed between different skeletal groups regarding the maxillary sinus dimensionsand volume, the results did show that there was an inverse and statistically significant correlation between the left maxillary sinuswidth and age (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The extension of the maxillary sinus is an important issue for fixed orthodontic treatments and maxillofacial surgery.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: The cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of 48 patients were obtained from the archive of theDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: Although no statistical difference was observed between different skeletal groups regarding the maxillary sinus dimensionsand volume, the results did show that there was an inverse and statistically significant correlation between the left maxillary sinuswidth and age (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The extension of the maxillary sinus is an important issue for fixed orthodontic treatments and maxillofacial surgery. The aimof this study is to investigate the dimensions and volume of the maxillary sinus in different skeletal classes and, also the effect onthe anteroposterior growth pattern of the maxilla. Materials and Methods: The cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of 48 patients were obtained from the archive of theDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. The CBCT images were taken prior to orthognathic surgery for the surgical planningof all patients. According to the sagittal skeletal position of the maxilla, the patients were divided into three groups: normal maxillagroup, retrognathic maxilla group and, prognathic maxilla group. Dimensional and volumetric measurements of the maxillary sinuswere performed by the same oral and maxillofacial radiologist. Results: Although no statistical difference was observed between different skeletal groups regarding the maxillary sinus dimensionsand volume, the results did show that there was an inverse and statistically significant correlation between the left maxillary sinuswidth and age (p

🔖

Cite This Article

CAN, F. E., ETÖZ, M., AŞANTOĞROL, F., TOPSAKAL, K. G. (2022). Evaluation of the maxillary sinus volume and dimensionsin different skeletal classes using cone beam computedtomography. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 4, 709–715. https://ajindex.com/articles/446282

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Saccucci M, Cipriani F, Carderi S, et al. Gender assessment through three-dimensional analysis of maxillary sinuses by means of Cone Beam Computed Tomography. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2015;19:185-93
  2. Lorkiewicz-Muszyńska D, Kociemba W, Rewekant A, et al. Development of the maxillary sinus from birth to age 18. postnatal growth pattern. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2015;79:1393-400
  3. Alberti PW. Applied surgical anatomy of the maxillary sinus. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1976;9:3-20
  4. Blanton PL, Biggs NL. Eighteen hundred years of controversy: the paranasal sinuses. Am J Anat 1969;124:135-47
  5. Nuñez-Castruita A, López-Serna N, Guzmán- López S. Prenatal development of the maxillary sinus: a perspective for paranasal sinüs surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012;146:997-1003
  6. Endo T, Abe R, Kuroki H, et al. Cephalometric evaluation of maxillary sinus sizes in different malocclusion classes. Odontology 2010;98:65-72
  7. Tikku T, Khanna R, Sachan K, et al. Dimensional changes in maxillary sinus of mouth breathers. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res 2013;3:9-14
  8. Oktay H. The study of the maxillary sinus areas in different orthodontic malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992;102:143-5
  9. Song SY, Hong JW, Roh TS, et al. Volume and distances of the maxillary sinus in craniofacial deformities with midfacial hypoplasia. OOtolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009;141, 614-20 10. Barghouth G, Prior JO, Lepori D, et al. Paranasal sinuses in children: size evaluation of maxillary, sphenoid, and frontal sinuses by magnetic resonance imaging and proposal of volume index percentile curves. Eur Radiol 2002;12:1451-8
  10. Paknahad M, Shahidi S, Zarei Z. Sexual Dimorphism of Maxillary Sinus Dimensions Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography. J Forensic Sci 2016;62:395- 8
  11. Oksayan R, Sokucu O, Yesildal S. Evaluation of maxillary sinus volume and dimensions in different vertical face growth patterns: a study of cone-beam computed tomography. Acta Odontol Scand 2017;5:345-9
  12. Erdur O, Ucar FI, Sekercı AE, et al. Maxillary sinus volumes of patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2015;79:1741-4
  13. Holdaway, Reed A. A soft-tissue cephalometric analysis and its use in orthodontic treatment planning. Part I. American journal of orthodontics 1983;84:1-28
  14. Nocini PF, D’Agostino A, Trevisiol L, et al. Is Le Fort I Osteotomy Associated With Maxillary Sinusitis? Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 2016;74:400. e1-400.e12. 1