Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2020 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 12

Evaluation of factors related to postoperative mortality in patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy due to periampullary region tumors

Pages
3065–3070
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We think thatpostoperative mortality may decrease by revealing the factors in the preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative periods.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: In this study, we aimed to investigate the factors related to postoperative mortality after pancreatoduodenectomy in our clinic.Materials and Methods: Patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy due to a periampullary region tumor between 2010 and2019 were included in the study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Mortality that occurred within 30 days after PD was defined as postoperative mortality and groupswere formed according to this definition Group 1(Postoperative Mortality) and Group 2(No mortality).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We think thatpostoperative mortality may decrease by revealing the factors in the preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative periods.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: In this study, we aimed to investigate the factors related to postoperative mortality after pancreatoduodenectomy in our clinic.Materials and Methods: Patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy due to a periampullary region tumor between 2010 and2019 were included in the study. Mortality that occurred within 30 days after PD was defined as postoperative mortality and groupswere formed according to this definition Group 1(Postoperative Mortality) and Group 2(No mortality). The demographic and clinicalfeatures, laboratory parameters, and tumor features of the patients were compared between the groups. Risk factors for mortalitywere analyzed by univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis.Results: 155 patients participated in our study. We found our postoperative mortality rate as 11.6%. Accordingly, Group 1 consistedof 18 and Group 2 consisted of 137 patients. The sex was similar (p: 0.235). The average age was higher in Group 1 than 2 (71.2 vs63.7, p:0.013). Tumor localizations were similar in groups (p:0.275). Lymph node positivity was similar in the groups (50% vs 41.6%,p:0.333). The pancreatic fistula was higher in Group 1, but not statistically significant (33% vs 18.2%, p:0.119). Preoperative whiteblood cell count (9490 mm3 vs 8050 mm3) and neutrophil count (6898 mm3 vs5442 mm3) were higher in Group 1. In multivariateanalysis, no parameters were single-handedly risk factors.Conclusion: No factor was found to be effective alone in the development of mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy. We think thatpostoperative mortality may decrease by revealing the factors in the preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative periods.

🔖

Cite This Article

TOPAL, U., ARIKAN, T. B., SÖZÜER, E. M., DAL, F., BOZKURT, G. K. (2022). Evaluation of factors related to postoperative mortality in patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy due to periampullary region tumors. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 12, 3065–3070. https://ajindex.com/articles/446281

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervik M, et al. GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC Cancer Base No. 11 [Internet].Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2013. Available from: http://globocan.iarc.fr, Accessed 2016
  2. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer 2015;136:359-86
  3. Macedo FIB, Jayanthi P, Mowzoon M, et al. The impact of surgeon volume on outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 2017;21:1723-31
  4. Kimura W, Miyata H, Gotoh M, et al. A pancreaticoduodenectomy risk model derived from 8575 cases from a national single-race population (Japanese) using a web-based data entry system: the 30-day and in-hospital mortality rates for pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 2014;259:773- 80
  5. Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Sohn TA, et al. Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990s: pathology, complications, and outcomes. Ann Surg 1997;226:248-57
  6. Simons JP, Shah SA, Ng SC, et al National complication rates after pancreatectomy: beyond mere mortality. J Gastrointest Surg 2009;13:1798-805
  7. Balzano G, Zerbi A, Capretti G, et al. Effect of hospital volume on outcome of pancreaticoduodenectomy in Italy. Br J Surg 2008;95:357-62
  8. Yoshioka R, Yasunaga H, Hasegawa, et al. Impact of hospital volume on hospital mortality, length of stay and total costs after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 2014;101:523-9
  9. Nimptsch U, Krautz C, Weber GF, et al.Nationwide in-hospital mortality following pancreatic surgery in Germany is higher than anticipated. Ann Surg 2016;264:1082-90
  10. Greenblatt DY, Kelly KJ, Rajamanickam V, et al. Preoperative factors predict perioperative morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2011;18:2126-35
  11. Hill JS, Zhou Z, Simons JP, et al. A simple risk score to predict in-hospital mortality after pancreatic resection for cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2010;17:1802-7
  12. Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, et al. International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula Definition: Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 2005;138:8- 13
  13. Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C, et al Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH)–an international study group of pancreatic surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery 2007;142:20-5
  14. Kim CG, Jo S, Kim JS. Impact of surgical volume on nation