Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2021 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 6

Clinical results of primary repair with silicone tubeintubation after traumatic injury of lacrimal canalicularsystem

Pages
1183–1188
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Annular intubation with the silicon tube can be used as an effective method for providing anatomical and functionalintegrity of the drainage system after blunt and / or penetrating traumatic injuries of the lacrimal canaliculi.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: To evaluate clinical results of primary repair with silicone tube intubation after traumatic injury of lacrimal canalicular system.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Fifteen patients applied to ophthalmology clinic at Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University betweenJanuary 2010 and May 2020 with traumatic injury of lacrimal canaliculi were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Annular intubation with the silicon tube can be used as an effective method for providing anatomical and functionalintegrity of the drainage system after blunt and / or penetrating traumatic injuries of the lacrimal canaliculi.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate clinical results of primary repair with silicone tube intubation after traumatic injury of lacrimal canalicular system. Materials and Methods: Fifteen patients applied to ophthalmology clinic at Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University betweenJanuary 2010 and May 2020 with traumatic injury of lacrimal canaliculi were included in the study. Data including the patients’demographic characteristics, causes of injury, time between trauma and surgery, surgical technique, post-operative time of siliconetube removal, post-operative follow-up period, and anatomical as well as functional outcomes were retrieved from the patients’clinical records. Results: Mean age of the patients was 26±22.5 (3 to 70 years) years (13 males, 2 females). Ten patients (66.6%) had blunt trauma,whereas penetrating injury was detected as causative factor of trauma in five patients (33.3%). Twelve patients (80%) had isolatedlower canalicular injury, two (13.3%) had upper canalicular injury, and the remaining one (6.7%) had both lower and upper canalicularinjury. The primary surgical repair with silicone tube intubation was performed in all patients. Twelve patients (80%) had successfulanatomical and functional outcomes. Post-operative ptosis was detected in one patient. Although two patients (13.3%) underwentre-operation at another center, status their functional success could not be acquired. Conclusion: Annular intubation with the silicon tube can be used as an effective method for providing anatomical and functionalintegrity of the drainage system after blunt and / or penetrating traumatic injuries of the lacrimal canaliculi.

🔖

Cite This Article

DOĞAN, M., EROĞUL, Ö., GOBEKA, H. H. (2022). Clinical results of primary repair with silicone tubeintubation after traumatic injury of lacrimal canalicularsystem. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 6, 1183–1188. https://ajindex.com/articles/446259

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Yazici B. Lacrimal system traumas. Oculoplasty, Turkish Society of Ophthalmology Education Publications No: 1, 2003; 275-84
  2. Murat O, Tekin Y, Saban S, et al. Epidemiological Evaluation of Our Eye Trauma Cases. Van Med J 2002;9
  3. Struck HG. Lacrimal system lacerations and their surgical repair. Ophthalmologe 2009;106:223-8
  4. Naik MN, Kelapure A, Rath S, Honavar SG. Management of canalicular lacerations: epidemiological aspects and experience with Mini-Monoka monocanalicular stent. Am J Ophthalmol 2008;145:375-80
  5. Herzum H, Holle P, Hintschich C. Eyelid injuries: epidemiological aspects. Ophthalmologe 2001;98: 1079-82
  6. Jordan DR, Ziai S, Gilberg SM, Mawn LA. Pathogenesis of canalicular lacerations. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2008;24:394-8
  7. Demir T, Gul FC. Repair results of canaliculi injuries with pigtail probe and silicone tube. Inonu University Med Faculty J 2011;18:87-90
  8. Leibovitch I, Kakizaki H, Prabhakaran V, Selva D. Canalicular lacerations: Repair with the Mini-MonokaR monocanalicular intubation stent. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 2010;41:472-7
  9. Ari S, Sahin A, Cingu AK, et al. Results of annular intubation with silicone tube in patients with canalicular damage after blunt and penetrating trauma. Dicle University Faculty of Med Department of Ophthalmology 2011;41:380-4
  10. Worst JG. Method for reconstructing torn lacrimal canaliculus. Am J Ophthalmol 1962;53:520-2
  11. Saunders DH, Shannor GM, Flanagan JC. The effectiveness of the pigtail probe method of repairing canalicular lacerations. Ophthalmic Surg 1978;9:33- 40 12. Jordan DR, Gilberg S, Mawn LA. The round-tipped, eyed pigtail probe for canalicular intubation: a review of 228 patients. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2008;24: 176-80
  12. Liang T, Zhao GQ, Li YL, et al. Efficiency and therapeutic effect of modified pigtail probe in anastomosing lacerated lacrimal canaliculus. Chin J Traumatol 2009;12:87-91
  13. Argin A, Demir MN, Duman S. Repair techniques in canalicular incisions. Turkish J Ophthalmology 2001;31:327-33
  14. Taskapili M, Kucuksahin H, Kocabora S, et al. Annular intubation of the silicone tube with the pigtail probe into both canaliculi only in the lower canaliculus incisions. Turkiye Klinikleri J Ophthalmol 2008;17:173-7
  15. Yilmaz A, Argin A, Lokmanoglu O. et al. Bicanalicular nasolacrimal intubation in canalicular incisions. Turkish J Ophthalmology 2006;36:373-6
  16. Wulc AE, Arterberry JF. The pathogenesis of canalicular laceration. Ophthalmology 1