Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2020 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 1

E-health literacy level in adolescents in terms of some descriptive characteristics

Pages
340–347
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Should be given particularly to the individuals withlow health literacy for child and they should be informed

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The study was planned to determine the e-health literacy attitudes of adolescents with different socio-economic levels studyingat secondary schools.Material and Methods: The study was a cross-sectional study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Descriptive Characteristics Form and e-Health Literacy Scale wereused.Results: The average age of the participants is 15.98±1.10 and score average of this scale’s is 26.61±7.43.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Should be given particularly to the individuals withlow health literacy for child and they should be informed
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The study was planned to determine the e-health literacy attitudes of adolescents with different socio-economic levels studyingat secondary schools.Material and Methods: The study was a cross-sectional study. Descriptive Characteristics Form and e-Health Literacy Scale wereused.Results: The average age of the participants is 15.98±1.10 and score average of this scale’s is 26.61±7.43. The independent variableaffecting e-Health Literacy Scale were age, sex, grade and type of access internet. The children at the school with low socioeconomic level have lower e-Health Literacy Scale scores than the others, younger students have lower scores than the others, girlshave lower scores than boys, those with internet access from a single source have lower scores than those with access from severalsources while the difference was found to be significant.Conclusion: The study found that the e-health literacy of the adolescents was at a medium level and their scale score averages withrespect to sex, age, grade and socio-economic level were significantly different. Should be given particularly to the individuals withlow health literacy for child and they should be informed

🔖

Cite This Article

TOP, F. Ü., YİĞİTBAŞ, Ç. (2022). E-health literacy level in adolescents in terms of some descriptive characteristics. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 1, 340–347. https://ajindex.com/articles/446190

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Free C, Phillips G, Felix L, Galli, L, Patel V, Edwards P. The effectiveness of M-health technologies for improving health and health services: A systematic review protocol. BMC Research Notes 2010;3:250
  2. Mackert M, Champlin SE, Holton A, et al. E-Health and health literacy: A research methodology review. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 2014;19:516-28
  3. Chesser A, Burke A, Reyes J, et al. Navigating the digital divide: A systematic review of e-Health literacy in underserved populations in the United States. Informatics for Health and Social Care 2016;41:1-19
  4. World Health Organization (WHO). Retrieved from
  5. Monkman H, Kushniruk AW. E-Health literacy issues, constructs, models, and methods for health information technology design and evaluation. Knowledge Management & E-Learning 2015;7:541-9
  6. Norman CD, Skinner HA. E-HEALS: The health literacy scale. J Medical Internet Research 2006;8:1-7
  7. Kwankam SY. What e-Health can offer? Bull World Health Organ 2004;82:800–2
  8. Richter SS, Hyun K, Neubeck L, Coorey G, et al. E-Health literacy: Predictors in a population with moderate-to-high cardiovascular risk. JMIR Human Factors 2017;4:1-9
  9. Ghaddar SF, Valerio MA, Garcia CM, Hansen L. (2011). Adolescent health literacy: The importance of credible sources for online health information. Journal of School Health 2011;82:28-36
  10. Paek HJ, Hove T. Social cognitive factors and perceived social ınfluences that ımprove adolescent health literacy. Health Communication 2012;27:727- 37
  11. Skopelja EN, Whipple EC, Richwine P. Reaching and teaching teens: Adolescent health literacy and the internet. J Consumer Health on the Internet 2008;12:105-18
  12. Gray NJ, Klein JD, Noyce PR, et al. The internet: A window on adolescent health literacy. J Adolesc Health 2005;37:243
  13. Skinner H, Biscope S, Poland B. Quality of internet access: barrier behind internet use statistics. Soc Sci Med 2003;57:875-80. net for Health Information. A Kaiser Family Foundation Survey. California, USA. 2001
  14. Hayran O. Universe, sample and sampling. Hayran O. Research and Statistical Methods in Health Sciences. Ankara. Nobel Medical Bookstores, 65- 75. 2012. Retrieved from https://books.google. com.tr/books?id=VRl0DwAAQBAJ&printsec= frontcover&dq=Sa%C4%9Fl%C4%B1k+Bilimlerinde+ Ara%C5%9Ft%C4%B1rma+ve+%C4%B0statistiksel+ Y%C3%B6ntemler+hayran+nobel&hl=tr&sa=X&ved= 0ahUKEwig_NqcvLLnAhXlpYsKHcTADlYQ6AEIK TAA#v=onepage&q=Sa%C4%9