SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2020 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 2

The hazardous impacts of multiple repeated cesarean deliveries on adhesion formation and obstetric outcomes

Özgür KAN
Ümit GÖRKEM
Ayşegül AYKILIÇ
Caner ÇAKIR
Özgür KOÇAK
Engin YILDIRIM
Pages
436–441
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The differences among the groups were found to be statisticallysignificant in terms of adhesion intensity and grade (1.13 vs 0.42, p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of this study was to determine whether the impact of repeat cesarean deliveries (CD) and abdominal adhesions onmaternal and fetal complications exists in patients with a history of one previous CD and ones with three or more prior CD.Material and Methods: A total of one hundred-one pregnant women with a history of at least one previous CD were included in thisprospective observational study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Participants were divided into two groups, patients with a single CD were added to the control group(n=56) and patients with a history of three or more CD were included in the study group (n=45).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The differences among the groups were found to be statisticallysignificant in terms of adhesion intensity and grade (1.13 vs 0.42, p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to determine whether the impact of repeat cesarean deliveries (CD) and abdominal adhesions onmaternal and fetal complications exists in patients with a history of one previous CD and ones with three or more prior CD.Material and Methods: A total of one hundred-one pregnant women with a history of at least one previous CD were included in thisprospective observational study. Participants were divided into two groups, patients with a single CD were added to the control group(n=56) and patients with a history of three or more CD were included in the study group (n=45). Preoperative scar characteristics andhemoglobin levels, intraoperative adhesion severity and grade were evaluated by using Linsky and Nair classifications for adhesion.In addition, duration of surgery, maternal complications and fetal status by using APGAR scoring system was analyzed, respectively.Results: Demographic features were comparable between the groups. The differences among the groups were found to be statisticallysignificant in terms of adhesion intensity and grade (1.13 vs 0.42, p

🔖

Cite This Article

KAN, Ö., GÖRKEM, Ü., AYKILIÇ, A., ÇAKIR, C., KOÇAK, Ö., YILDIRIM, E. (2022). The hazardous impacts of multiple repeated cesarean deliveries on adhesion formation and obstetric outcomes. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 2, 436–441. https://ajindex.com/articles/446083

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Bates GW Jr, Shomento S. Adhesion prevention in patients with multiple cesarean deliveries. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;205:19-24
  2. Gregory KD, Jackson S, Korst L, et al. Cesarean versus vaginal delivery: whose risks? Whose benefits? Am J Perinatol 2012;29:7-18
  3. Cook JR, Jarvis S, Knight M, et al. Multiple repeat caesarean section in the UK: incidence and consequences to mother and child. A national, prospective, cohort study. BJOG 2013;120:85-91
  4. Tulandi T, Agdi M, Zarei A, et al. Adhesion development and morbidity after repeat cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;201:1-6
  5. Diamond MP, Wexner SD, diZereg GS, et al. Adhesion prevention and reduction: current status and future recommendations of a multinational interdisciplinary consensus conference. Surg Innov 2010;17:183-8
  6. Lyell DJ. Adhesions and perioperative complications of repeat cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;205:11-8
  7. Stark M, Hoyme UB, Stubert B, et al. Post-cesarean adhesions-are they a unique entity? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2008;21:513-6
  8. Pschera H, Kjaeldgaard A, Larsson B. Fibrinolytic activity in amniotic fluid during late pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1986;65:417-20
  9. Uyanikoglu H, Karahan MA, Turp AB, et al. Are multiple repeated cesarean sections really as safe? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2017;30:482-5
  10. Alshehri KA, Ammar AA, Aldhubabian MA, et al. Outcomes and complications after repeat cesarean sections among King Abdulaziz University Hospital patients. Mater Sociomed 2019;31:119-24
  11. Kan O, Alkilic A. Relationship between scar characteristics and intraperitoneal adhesions in repeated cesarean deliveries. Bozok Med J 2019;9:97- 101
  12. Nair SK, Bhat IK, Aurora AL. Role of proteolytic enzyme in the prevention of postoperative intraperitoneal adhesions. Arch Surg 1974;108:849-53
  13. Linsky CB, Diamond MP, Cunningham T, et al. Adhesion reduction in the rabbit uterine horn model using an absorbable barrier, TC-7. J Reprod Med 1987;32:17- 20
  14. Tampakoudis P, Assimakopoulos E, Grimbizis G, et al. Caesarean section rates and indications in Greece: data from a 24-year period in a teaching hospital. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 2004;31:289-92
  15. O’Dwyer V, Hogan JL, Farah N, et al. Maternal mortality and the rising cesarean rate. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2012;116:162-4
  16. Kan O, Gorkem U, Alkilic A, et al. Efficacy of stirae gravidarum extension and localization of predicting intraperitoneal adhesion risk. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2019; 45