SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2020 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 9

Effect of catheter selection in hypospadias repair

Turan YILDIZ
Mehmet ARPACIK
Pages
2377–2381
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The incidence of catheter-related complications was significantly higher in Group A compared to Group B (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The effects of catheter use on postoperative complications in patients undergoing hypospadias repair remains controversial.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectivity of silicone and feeding catheters on surgical outcomes in patients undergoing hypospadias repair.Material and Methods: The retrospective study included 169 patients with distal and midpenile hypospadias who were operatively treated with tubularized incised plate urethroplasty between July 2014 and July 2018.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The incidence of catheter-related complications was significantly higher in Group A compared to Group B (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The effects of catheter use on postoperative complications in patients undergoing hypospadias repair remains controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectivity of silicone and feeding catheters on surgical outcomes in patients undergoing hypospadias repair.Material and Methods: The retrospective study included 169 patients with distal and midpenile hypospadias who were operatively treated with tubularized incised plate urethroplasty between July 2014 and July 2018. A feeding catheter was used in 79 patients (Group A) and a silicone catheter was in 90 patients (Group B). Postoperative complications including catheter-related complications(catheter occlusion, urine leak around the catheter, and spontaneous withdrawal) and hypospadias-related complications (urethrocutaneous fistula, meatal stenosis, urethral stenosis, and glans dehiscence) were recorded for each patient.Results: The age of the patients ranged between 6 months and 15 years. The incidence of catheter-related complications was significantly higher in Group A compared to Group B (p

🔖

Cite This Article

YILDIZ, T., ARPACIK, M. (2022). Effect of catheter selection in hypospadias repair. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 9, 2377–2381. https://ajindex.com/articles/446052

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Baskin LS. Hypospadias In: Coran AG, eds. Pediatric Surgery. 7th edition. Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 2014;1531-55
  2. Sweet R, Schrott H, Kurland R, et al. Study of the incidence of hypospadias in Rochester, Minnesota, 1940-1970, and a case-control comparison of possible etiologic factors. Mayo Clin Proc 1974;49:52-8
  3. Bertozzi M, Yıldız A, Kamal B, et al. Multicentric experience on double dartos flap protection in tubularized incised plate urethroplasty for distal and midpenile hypospadias. Pediatr Surg Int 2011;27:1331-6
  4. Yildiz T, Tahtali IN, Ates DC, et al. Age of patient is a risk factor for urethrocutaneous fistula in hypospadias surgery. J Pediatr Urol 2013;9:900-3
  5. Al-Ghorairy BA, Elashry OM, Al-Housain AE, et al. Analysis of five-year experience with tubularized incised plate urethroplasty for anterior and mid penile hypospadias. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2009;19:90-5
  6. Rompré MPD, Nadeau G, Moore K, et al. Learning curve for TIP urethroplasty: A single-surgeon experience. Can Urol Assoc J 2013;7:789-94
  7. Snodgrass W. Tubularized, incised plate urethroplasty for distal hypospadias. J Urol 1994;151:464-5
  8. Oswald J, Korner I, Riccabona M. Comparison of the perimeatal-based flap (Mathieu) and the tubularized incised-plateurethroplasty (Snodgrass) in primary distal hypospadias. BJU Int 2000;85:725-7
  9. Snodgrass W. Changing concepts in hypospadias repair. Current opinion in urology 1999;9:513-6
  10. Lee LC, Schröder A, Bägli DJ, et al. Stent-related complications after hypospadias repair: a prospective trial comparing Silastic tubing and Koyle urethral stents. J Pediatr Urol 2018;14:423
  11. Hosseinpour M, Noori S, Amir-Beigi M, et al. Safety of latex urinary catheters for the short time drainage. Urol Ann 2014;6:198-201
  12. Yesildag E, Tekant G, Sarimurat N, et al. Do patch procedures prevent complications of the Mathieu technique? J Urol 2004;171:2623-5
  13. Xie QG, Su C, Li ZQ, et al. Foley catheter versus urethral stent plus gastric tube for urine drainage following urethroplasty. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue 2014;20:439-41
  14. Snodgrass W, Bush N, Cost N. Tubularized incised plat hypospadias repair for dista hypospadias. J Pediatr Urol 2010;6:408-13
  15. Sarhan OM, El-Hefnawy AS, Hafez AT, et al. Factors affecting outcome of tubularized incised plate (TIP) urethroplasty: Single-center experience with 500 cases. J Pediatr Urol 2009;5:378-82
  16. Tavakkoli TK, Mohammadi RT. Tubularized incised plate urethroplasty using buccal mucosa graft for