SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2021 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 7

Contrast nephropathy ıncidence after coronaryangiography among patients with acute renal dysfunction

İhsan ATEŞ
Bilal KATİPOĞLU
Fatih ACEHAN
Fatih DEDE
Pages
1273–1276
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This difference was statistically significant (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Contrast-induced acute kidney injury (AKI) may be seen after contrast agent exposure which is known as nephrotoxic.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It is fact that, patients with AKI have an increased risk after contrast exposure compared to patients with normal renal function values.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This difference was statistically significant (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: Contrast-induced acute kidney injury (AKI) may be seen after contrast agent exposure which is known as nephrotoxic. It is fact that, patients with AKI have an increased risk after contrast exposure compared to patients with normal renal function values. However, the incidence of contrast nephropathy after contrast exposure with AKI is not clear. In this study, we planned to investigate the incidence of contrast nephropathy in patients undergoing coronary angiography with AKI and whether there is an increased risk compared to the control group.Materials and Methods: The study was planned as a retrospective study and we investigated the clinical outcome of patients who underwent isoosmolar contrast angiography in the arterial phase with acute kidney injury between January 2014 and December 2017. Results: The number of AKI patients included in the study was 280 and the control group consisted of 478 participants. There was no statistically significant difference between two groups. (3.2% (n: 9) of patients with AKI contrast nephropathy vs 6.5% (n: 31) of patients with normal kidney function and contrast nephropathy) (p> 0.05). On the other hand, there was statistically significant difference between two groups according to diabetes mellitus (patients with contrast nephropathy 26 (65%) had diabetes vs 14 (35%) participants had no diabetes). This difference was statistically significant (p

🔖

Cite This Article

ATEŞ, İ., KATİPOĞLU, B., ACEHAN, F., DEDE, F. (2022). Contrast nephropathy ıncidence after coronaryangiography among patients with acute renal dysfunction. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 7, 1273–1276. https://ajindex.com/articles/445998

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Babuin L, Scarpa D, Jaffe AS. Renal Dysfunction: How to Think About That in Acute Coronary Syndromes. Curr Cardiol Rep 2017;19:91
  2. Simone DB, Ansaloni L, Sartelli M, et al. Is the risk of contrast-induced nephropathy a real contraindication to perform intravenous contrast enhanced Computed Tomography for non-traumatic acute abdomen in Emergency Surgery Department? Acta Biomed 2018; 89:158-72
  3. Sedhai YR, Golamari R, Timalsina S, et al. ContrastInduced Nephropathy After Cardiac Catheterization: Culprits, Consequences and Predictors.Am J Med Sci 2017;354:462-6
  4. Bruce RJ, Djamali A, Shinki K, et al. Background fluctuation of kidney function versus contrast-induced nephrotoxicity. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;192:711- 8
  5. Guitterez NV, Diaz A, Timmis GC, et al. Determinants of serum creatinine trajectory in acute contrast nephropathy. J Interv Cardiol 2002;15:349-54
  6. Kellum JA, Lameire N, Aspelin P, et al. Kidney disease: improving global outcomes (KDIGO) acute kidney injury work group. KDIGO clinical practice guideline for acute kidney injury. Kidney Int 2012;2:1-138
  7. Association AD
  8. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes. Diabetes Care 2017;40:11-24
  9. Rudnick M, Feldman H. Contrast-induced nephropathy: what are the true clinical consequences? Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2008;3:263-72
  10. Maioli M, Toso A, Leoncini M, et al. Persistent renal damage after contrast-induced acute kidney injury: incidence, evolution, risk factors, and prognosis. Circulation 2012;125:3099-107
  11. Scharnweber T, Alhilali L, Fakhran S. Contrast-induced acute kidney injury: pathophysiology, manifestations, prevention, and management. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2017;25:743-53
  12. Heyman SN, Brezis M, Epstein FH, et al. Early renal medullary hypoxic injury from radiocontrast and indomethacin. Kidney Int 1991;40:632-42
  13. Naziroglu M, Yoldas N, Uzgur EN, Kayan M. Role of contrast media on oxidative stress, Ca 2+ signaling and apoptosis in kidney. J Membr Biol 2013;246:91- 100
  14. Liu ZZ, Schmerbach K, Lu Y, et al. Iodinated contrast media cause direct tubular cell damage, leading to oxidative stress, low nitric oxide, and impairment of tubuloglomerular feedback. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2014;306:864-72
  15. Zhang Y, Wang J, Yang X, et al. The serial effect of iodinated contrast media on renal hemodynamics and oxygenation as evaluated by ASL and BOLD MRI. Contrast Media Mol Imaging 2012;7:418-25
  16. Ozkok S, Ozkok A. Contrast-induced acute kidney injury: A rev