Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2021 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 12

Three-dimensional stereophotogrammetric analysis of facial soft tissues following bone-borne rapid maxillary expansion

Pages
2154–2159
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These changes remained stable for 3 months. 3D stereophotogrammetric facial imaging method is an easy and non-invasive method that can be used to analyze the changes of facial soft tissues after RME treatment.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Bone-borne rapid maxillary expander (RME) is one of the latest expander designs being used for skeletal expansion by applying forces through palatal mini-screws.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate soft tissue facial changes following RME using 3D stereophotogrammetry.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These changes remained stable for 3 months. 3D stereophotogrammetric facial imaging method is an easy and non-invasive method that can be used to analyze the changes of facial soft tissues after RME treatment.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: Bone-borne rapid maxillary expander (RME) is one of the latest expander designs being used for skeletal expansion by applying forces through palatal mini-screws. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate soft tissue facial changes following RME using 3D stereophotogrammetry. Materials and Methods: A total of 15 subjects (6 males and 9 females) with a mean age of 12.1±1.4 years who underwent upper arch expansion using bone-borne RME as a component of their orthodontic therapy were recruited in this retrospective study. 3D facial images (3dMD Ltd, Atlanta, Ga) generating 3D soft tissue meshes before expansion (T0), immediately after expansion (T1), and after a 3-month retention phase (T2) were used to capture facial scans of 15 subjects. Based on twenty-three landmarks, 10 linear measurements were made from each of 3D images. Comparisons of measurements at 3 different times were evaluated with one-way Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (p < 0.05). Results: Statistically significant changes were observed in the mouth (chr-chl) and nasal (alr-all) width in T0-T1 and T0-T2. No significant differences were found in the upper and lower face heights, total face height, upper and lower lip heights, upper and lower vermillion heights and intercanthal width. Conclusion: Significant increases in mouth and nose width were obtained by bone-borne RME. These changes remained stable for 3 months. 3D stereophotogrammetric facial imaging method is an easy and non-invasive method that can be used to analyze the changes of facial soft tissues after RME treatment.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖKÇE, G. (2022). Three-dimensional stereophotogrammetric analysis of facial soft tissues following bone-borne rapid maxillary expansion. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 12, 2154–2159. https://ajindex.com/articles/445989

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Biederman W. Rapid correction of Class III malocclusion by midpalatal expansion. Am J Orthod 1973;63:47-55
  2. Abedini S, Elkenawy I, Kim E, Moon W. Threedimensional soft tissue analysis of the face following micro-implant-supported maxillary skeletal expansion. Prog Orthod 2018;19:1-10
  3. Kanomi R, Deguchi T, Kakuno E, et al. CBCT of skeletal changes following rapid maxillary expansion to increase arch-length with a developmentdependent bonded or banded appliance. Angle Orthod 2013;83:851-7
  4. Braun S, Bottrel A, Lee KG, et al. The biomechanics of rapid maxillary sutural expansion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;118:257-61
  5. Chung CH, Font B. Skeletal and dental changes in the sagittal, vertical, and transverse dimensions after rapid palatal expansion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;126:569-75
  6. Wertz RA. Skeletal and dental changes accompanying rapid midpalatal suture opening. Am J Orthod 1970;58:41-66
  7. Silva Filho OG, Villas Boas MC, Capelozza Filho L. Rapid maxillary expansion in the primary and mixed dentitions: a cephalometric evaluation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991;100:171-81
  8. Lagravère MO, Carey J, Heo G, et al. Transverse, vertical, and anteroposterior changes from boneanchored maxillary expansion vs traditional rapid maxillary expansion: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137:304-447
  9. Baysal A, Ozturk MA, Sahan AO, Uysal T. Facial softtissue changes after rapid maxillary expansion analyzed with 3-dimensional stereophotogrammetry: A randomized, controlled clinical trial. Angle Orthod 2016; 86:934-42
  10. Borekci C, Ozkalayci N. Orthodontics and Smile Aesthetics. International Journal of Dental Sciences. 2016;1:5-12
  11. Proffit W, Fields HW, Sarver DM. Orthodontic Diagnosis. In: Proffit W, Fields HW, Sarver DM, authors. Contemporary orthodontics 4th ed. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2006. 189
  12. Johnson BM, McNamara JA, Bandeen RL, Baccetti T. Changes in soft tissue nasal widths associated with rapid maxillary expansion in prepubertal and postpubertal subjects. Angle Orthod 2010;80:995- 1001
  13. Weinberg SM, Scott NM, Neiswanger K, et al. Digital three-dimensional photogrammetry: evaluation of anthropometric precision and accuracy using a Genex 3D camera system. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2004;41:507-18
  14. Lane C, Harrell W Jr. Completing the 3-dimensional picture. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;133:612- 20. 15
  15. Karatas OH, Toy E. Three-dimensional imaging techniques: a lite