Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2021 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 8

Assessing of the forensic reports documented by forensicmedicine polyclinic of Adiyaman education and researchhospital in 2017-2018

Pages
1483–1489
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was found that injuries occurred most commonly in the head - neck region (n = 355; 29.1%) and the extremity region is secondly (n = 298 ; 24.4%).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Blunt trauma, firearm/sharp object injuries, suicide, and accident are judicial events that can cause injury or death of individuals are considered.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, it was aimed to examine the characteristics of the reports prepared in the polyclinic and thus to determine the forensic case data in our region.Materials and Methods: In this study, 1,222 cases who lived in and around the province of Adıyaman and whose forensic reports were prepared due to physical injury were retrospectively in 2017 and 2018.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was found that injuries occurred most commonly in the head - neck region (n = 355; 29.1%) and the extremity region is secondly (n = 298 ; 24.4%).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: Blunt trauma, firearm/sharp object injuries, suicide, and accident are judicial events that can cause injury or death of individuals are considered. They are the duties of physicians to examine forensic cases in a timely and carefully manner and to prepare reports by recording the findings obtained. In this study, it was aimed to examine the characteristics of the reports prepared in the polyclinic and thus to determine the forensic case data in our region.Materials and Methods: In this study, 1,222 cases who lived in and around the province of Adıyaman and whose forensic reports were prepared due to physical injury were retrospectively in 2017 and 2018. We retrospectively examined in terms of sociodemographic characteristics, report date, referring judicial authority, cause of the event, injury site and the decisions.Results: 930 (76.1%) of all cases were male and 292 (23.9%) were female. It was observed that the reports were prepared most commonly because of battery (46.8%), followed by a traffic accident (29.5%). It was found that injuries occurred most commonly in the head - neck region (n = 355; 29.1%) and the extremity region is secondly (n = 298 ; 24.4%). Nasal bone was the most commonly broken bone (n = 87; 18.2%). Conclusion: It was thought that determining regional profiles and data in judicial events would contribute to taking preventive measures (education-psychosocial support etc.) and appropriate planning. In addition, preventive measures should be taken for accidental events that occur in childhood and old age.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAFADAR, H., ŞEHLİKOĞLU, K. (2022). Assessing of the forensic reports documented by forensicmedicine polyclinic of Adiyaman education and researchhospital in 2017-2018. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 8, 1483–1489. https://ajindex.com/articles/445910

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. The Constitution of The Republic of Turkey'', Official Gazette, dated 09.11.1982. Available from: https:// global.tbmm.gov.tr/docs/constitution_en.pdf 2. Ketenci HC, Kir MZ, Basbulut AZ, et al. Evaluation of cases referred to the council of forensic medicine Erzurum branch office. J For Med 2013
  2. Goceoglu UU, Balci Y, Erbas M, et al. Evaluation of young people of Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University training and research hospital outpatient clinic of forensic medicine. Medical J Mugla Sitki Kocman University 2019
  3. Guven FMK, Butun C, Beyaztas FY, et al. Evaluation of forensic cases admitted to Cumhuriyet University hospital. Meandros Med Dent J 2009
  4. Turkish Penalty Law. Law Number: 5237, acceptance date 26/9/2004, published at Official Gazette in 12/10/2004, The number of Official Gazette which published at: 25611. 6. https://www.atk.gov.tr/tckyaralama24-11-15.pdf access date 01.05.2020. 7. Koylu S, Karbeyaz K. The evaluation of the relationship between alcohol and forensic cases admitted to Eskişehir Osmangazi University faculty of medicine department of forensic medicine. Osmangazi J Med 2018
  5. Akbaba M, Isır AB, Karaarslan B, et al. Evaluation of the forensic reports documented at the department of forensic medicine of Gaziantep University (2005- 2011). The Bulletin of Legal Med 2012
  6. Ulucay T, Ziver A, Zeyfeoglu Y, et al. The evaluation of cases which applied to forensic medicine polyclinic of medical faculty of Celal Bayar University. Turkish J Forensic Med 2006
  7. Tirasci Y, Durmaz U, Altınal A, et al. A Retrospective evaluation of judicial reports ıssued by forensic medicine department of Dicle University. Dicle Med J 2016
  8. Guven FMK, Butun C, Beyaztas FY, et al. Evaluation of forensic cases admitted to Cumhuriyet University hospital. Official J Adnan Menderes Univer Fac Med, 2009
  9. Cakir G, Senol E. Assessing the forensic reports documented by forensic medicine polyclinic of Karsiyaka state hospital in 2015. Tepecik Education and Research Patient J 2017
  10. Karanfil R, Zeren C. The Retrospective evaluation of cases applied to forensic medicine department of medical faculty of Kahramanmaraş Sutcu Imam Unıversıty between 2009-2010. Turkish J Forensic Med 2011
  11. Koksal O, Ozdemir F, Bulut M, et al. Analysis of patients with stabbing ınjuries who applied to emergency department of Uludag University hospital. J Uludag University Faculty of M