Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2021 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 5

Does intravitreal injection of aflibercept affect the corneal endothelium?

Pages
1068–1072
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, the decreasing number of endothelial cells with age may be susceptible to aflibercept injection.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: To evaluate the effect of intravitreal aflibercept injections on the corneal endothelium in patients with exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD), diabetic macular edema (DME), and central retinal vascular occlusion (CRVO).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: The study included 50 eyes of 44 patients who underwent three consecutive intravitreal aflibercept injections with the diagnosis of AMD, DME or CRVO.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, the decreasing number of endothelial cells with age may be susceptible to aflibercept injection.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the effect of intravitreal aflibercept injections on the corneal endothelium in patients with exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD), diabetic macular edema (DME), and central retinal vascular occlusion (CRVO). Materials and Methods: The study included 50 eyes of 44 patients who underwent three consecutive intravitreal aflibercept injections with the diagnosis of AMD, DME or CRVO. All patients underwent complete ophthalmological examination and specular microscopy at pre-injection and at one month after the third injection. The pre-injection and post-injection values of endothelial cell density (CD), coefficient of variation (CoV), hexagonality (Hex), central corneal thickness (CCT), and intraocular pressure (IOP) were compared statistically. Results: The mean age of the patients was 71.09 ± 5.6 (40–87) years. Thirty-six eyes had exudative AMD, 10 had DME and 4 had CRVO. There were no significant differences in CD, CoV, Hex, CCT, and IOP between the pre-injection and post-injection measurements. However, in patients with AMD, the mean pre-injection CD was 2439.71 ± 476.16 cells/mm2 and the mean post-injection CD was 2286.18 ± 427.24 cells/mm2. CD values were decreased in the AMD group, but this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.061). In patients with AMD, the mean pre-injection and post-injection CCT values were 536.1 ± 28.4 μm and 542.5 ± 32.9 μm, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (p = 0.04). Conclusion: Intravitreal aflibercept injection had no manifest devastating effects on the corneal endothelium. However, the decreasing number of endothelial cells with age may be susceptible to aflibercept injection.

🔖

Cite This Article

Ulutas, H. G., Gunduz, G. U. (2022). Does intravitreal injection of aflibercept affect the corneal endothelium?. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 5, 1068–1072. https://ajindex.com/articles/445897

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Marneros AG. Role of VEGF-A in aging disease of the eye. EMBO Mol Med 2016;8:208-31
  2. Yeh S, Kim SJ, Ho AC, et al. Therapies for macular edema associated with central vein occlusion: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 2015;122:769-78 3. Kucukerdonmez C, Gelisken F, Yoeruek E, et al. Switching intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment in neovasculer age-related macular degeneration. Eur J Ophthalmol 2015;25:51-6
  3. Avery LR, Castellarin AA, Steinle NC, et al. Systemic pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intravitreal aflibercept, bevacizumab and ranibizumab. Retina 2017;37:1847-58
  4. Kucumen RB, Yenerel NM. Diabetic macular edema and its treatment modal ities. Turk J Ophthalmol 2012;42:53-60
  5. Ricca A, Wirostko B. Ocular hypertension following intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor therapy: review of the literature and possible role of nitric oxide. J Glaucoma 2016;25:291-300
  6. Falavarjani KG, QD Nguyen. Adverse events and complications associated with intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF agents:a review of literature. Eye 2013;27:787-94
  7. Ozcaliskan S, Yilmazbas P, Ozturk F, et al. The short- term effect of intravitreal bevacizumab injection on intraocular pressure. Turk J Ophthalmol 2014;44:361- 4
  8. Campa C. Effect of VEGF and anti-VEGF compounds on retinal pigment epithelium permeability: an in vitro study. Eur J Ophthalmol 2013;23:690-6
  9. Miura Y, Klettner A, Roider J. VEGF antagonists decrease barrier function of retinal pigment epithelium in vitro: possible participation of intracellular glutathione. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010;51:4848- 55
  10. Forrester J, Dick A, McMenamin P, et al. General and ocular pharmacology. In: Forrester J, Dick A, McMenamin P, Roberts F, Pearlman E, eds. The Eye: Basic Science in Practice. 4th edition. London: WB Saunders; 2015 p. 338-69
  11. Philipp W, Speicher L, Humpel C. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptors in inflamed and vascularized human corneas. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000;41:2514-22
  12. Niwa Y, Kakinoki M, Sawada T, et al. Ranibizumab and aflibercept: intraocular pharmacokinetics and their effects on aqueous VEGF level in vitrectomized and nonvitrectomized macaques eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2015;56:6501-5
  13. Gan L, Fagerholm P, Palmblad J. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptor VEGFR-2 in the regulation of corneal neovascularization and wound healing. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2004;82:557-63