Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2021 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 4

Histopathological evaluation of percutaneous renalbiopsies: A single center experience

Pages
674–679
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

With electron microscopic examination, it might be possible to decreasethe number of patients who cannot be definitively diagnosed histomorphologically.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of this study was to examine the indications, demographic features and histopathological diagnosis category of renalbiopsies evaluated at the Pathology Laboratory of the University of Health Sciences Diyarbakır Gazi Yasargil Training and ResearchHospital.Materials and Methods: The information of 190 patients who underwent percutaneous renal needle biopsy between July 2017 andFebruary 2020 was obtained from the approved final pathology reports.Results: 190 biopsies were performed. 60% (n=114) and 40% (n=76) of the biopsies were native and transplant, respectively. 59.5%of the patients were male.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Four of the patients were under 18 years.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:With electron microscopic examination, it might be possible to decreasethe number of patients who cannot be definitively diagnosed histomorphologically.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to examine the indications, demographic features and histopathological diagnosis category of renalbiopsies evaluated at the Pathology Laboratory of the University of Health Sciences Diyarbakır Gazi Yasargil Training and ResearchHospital.Materials and Methods: The information of 190 patients who underwent percutaneous renal needle biopsy between July 2017 andFebruary 2020 was obtained from the approved final pathology reports.Results: 190 biopsies were performed. 60% (n=114) and 40% (n=76) of the biopsies were native and transplant, respectively. 59.5%of the patients were male. Four of the patients were under 18 years. The mean ages of the native and transplant biopsy groupeswere 37±14, and 34±14, respectively. Proteinuria was the most common biopsy indication (79.5%).Nonspecific changes werethe most common diagnosis of the native biopsies. It was followed by focal segmental glomerulonephritis (FSGS), membranousglomerulonephritis (MGN), and IgA nephritis (IgAN). The most common secondary cause of glomerulonephritis was lupus nephritis.Acute cellular rejection was the most common diagnosis of the transplant renal biopsies.Conclusion: Proteinuria was identified as the most common indication for biopsy. In the present study, the primary glomerulardisease was FSGS while the secondary was lupus nephritis. With electron microscopic examination, it might be possible to decreasethe number of patients who cannot be definitively diagnosed histomorphologically.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜNAY, E., AY, N., KAYA, Ş., YÜKSEL, E., ŞENOL, A. (2022). Histopathological evaluation of percutaneous renalbiopsies: A single center experience. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 4, 674–679. https://ajindex.com/articles/445884

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Printza N, Bosdou J, Pantzaki A, et al. Percutaneous ultrasound-guided renal biopsy in children: A single centre experience. Hippokratia 2011;15:258-61
  2. Pirani CL: Evaluation of kidney biopsy specimens, In Tisher CG, Brenner BM (eds): Renal Pathology: With Clinical and Functional Correlations (2nd ed). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott 1994;85-115
  3. Fuiano G, Mazza G, Comi N, et al. Current indications for renal biopsy: A questionnaire-based survey. Am J Kidney Dis 2000;35:448-57
  4. Piskinpasa S, Dede F, Akoglu H, et al. Clinicopathological Evaluation of the Kidney Biopsies: Our Center’s Experience. Turk Neph Dial Transpl 2012;21:167-72
  5. Rivera F, López-Gómez JM, Pérez-García R. Spanish Registry of glomerulonephritis: Frequency of renal pathology in Spain. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2002;17: 1594-602
  6. Rychlík I, Jancová E, Tesar V, et al. The Czech registry of renal biopsies. Occurrence of renal diseases in the years 1994-2000. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2004;19: 3040-9
  7. Schena FP: Survey of the Italian registry of renal biopsies. Frequency of the renal diseases for 7 consecutive years. The Italian Group of Renal Immunopathology. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1997;12: 418-26
  8. Heaf J, Løkkegaard H, Larsen S. The epidemiology and prognosis of glomerulonephritis in Denmark 1985- 1997. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1999;14:1889-97
  9. Haas M, Loupy A, Lefaucheur C, et al. The Banff 2017 Kidney Meeting Report: Revised diagnostic criteria for chronic active T cell–mediated rejection, antibodymediated rejection, and prospects for integrative endpoints for next-generation clinical trials. Am J Transplant 2018;18:293-307
  10. Richards NT, Darby S, Howie AJ, et al. Knowledge of renal histology alters patient management in over 40% of cases. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1994;9:1255-9
  11. Korbet SM. Percutaneous renal biopsy. Semin Nephrol 2002;22:254-67
  12. Stratta P, Canavese C, Marengo M, et al. Risk management of renal biopsy: 1387 cases over 30 years in a single centre. Eur J Clin Invest 2007;37:954- 63
  13. Eiro M, Katoh T, Watanabe T. Risk factors for bleeding complications in percutaneous renal biopsy. Clin Exp Nephrol 2005;9:40-5
  14. Hergesell O, Felten H, Andrassy K, et al: Safety of ultrasound-guided percutaneous renal biopsyretrospective analysis of 1090 consecutive cases. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1998;13:975-7
  15. Manno C, Strippoli GF, Arnesano L, et al. Predictors of bleeding complications in percutaneous ultrasoundguided renal biopsy. Kidney Int 2004;66: