Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2021 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 5

Strategies for ERCP complications: A new performer’sexperience and strategies for beginners to avoid complications

Pages
932–936
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

No surgery needed complications or mortality has been reported.Conclusion: We believe a new performer can reduce the rate and risk of complications for the first year of his/her to high volume andexperienced centers’ rate by using a predefined protocol.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: This study aims to share our experience of our first field experience after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP) training and share our “The starting strategy for new ERCP performer” protocol which we created to prevent severecomplications in our first year on field experienceMaterials and Methods: 190 ERCP cases performed at Health Sciences University - Kartal Dr.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Lütfi Kirdar Research and EducationHospital ERCP unit between June 2018 to November 2019 are documented retrospectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:No surgery needed complications or mortality has been reported.Conclusion: We believe a new performer can reduce the rate and risk of complications for the first year of his/her to high volume andexperienced centers’ rate by using a predefined protocol.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: This study aims to share our experience of our first field experience after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP) training and share our “The starting strategy for new ERCP performer” protocol which we created to prevent severecomplications in our first year on field experienceMaterials and Methods: 190 ERCP cases performed at Health Sciences University - Kartal Dr. Lütfi Kirdar Research and EducationHospital ERCP unit between June 2018 to November 2019 are documented retrospectively. All the cases were taken to procedure through our protocol rules. The protocol is described fully with details in the text.Results: A total of 190 (89 female-101 male) patients had undergone ERCP, of which 39 were diagnostic, 151 was therapeutic. 16 (8.4%) cases were aborted during the protocol described points during the ERCP procedure to avoid complications. Five of these cases were referred to another hospital, 7 cases were performed in another session, and 3 cases underwent surgery without performing another session of ERCP due to a given diagnosis of malignancy during ERCP. All other cases are performed regularly with a cannulation success rate of 88%. Complications occurred in 7 (3.6%) cases; 2 cholangitis due to persisting bile stone, 4 pancreatitis (highest hospitalization for 4 days), and one hemorrhage. No surgery needed complications or mortality has been reported.Conclusion: We believe a new performer can reduce the rate and risk of complications for the first year of his/her to high volume andexperienced centers’ rate by using a predefined protocol.

🔖

Cite This Article

Goret, N. E., Gokceimam, M. (2022). Strategies for ERCP complications: A new performer’sexperience and strategies for beginners to avoid complications. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 5, 932–936. https://ajindex.com/articles/445857

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Blumgart LH, Cotton PB, Burwood R, et al. Endoscopy and retrograde choledochopancreatography in the diagnosis of the jaundiced patient. The Lancet 1972; 300:1269-73
  2. Dickinson PB, Belsito AA, and Cramer GG. Diagnostic value of endoscopic cholangiopancreatography. JAMA 1973;225:944-8
  3. Anderson MA, Fisher L, Jain R, et al. Complications of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 2012;75:467-73
  4. Vandervoort J, Soetikno RM, Tham TCK, et al. Risk factors for complications after performance of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56:652-6
  5. Salminen P, Laine S, and Gullichsen R. Severe and fatal complications after ERCP: Analysis of 2555 procedures in a single experienced center. Surg Endosc 2008; 22:1965-70
  6. Freeman ML. Understanding risk factors and avoiding complications with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2003;5:145-53
  7. Masci E, Mariani A, Curioni S, et al. Risk Factors for Pancreatitis Following Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: A Meta-Analysis. Endoscopy 2003; 35:830-4
  8. Doppl WE, Weber HP, Temme H, et al. Evaluation of ERCP- and endoscopic sphincterotomy-induced pancreatic damage: a prospective study on the time course and the significance of serum levels of pancreatic secretory enzymes. Eur J Med Res 1996; 1:303-11
  9. Rabenstein T and Hahn EG. Post-ERCP pancreatitis: is the endoscopist’s experience the major risk factor. JoP 2002;3:177-87
  10. Murray WR. Reducing the Incidence and Severity of Post Ercp Pancreatitis. Scand J Surg 2005;94:112-6
  11. Cotton PB, Garrow DA, Gallagher J, et al. Risk factors for complications after ERCP: a multivariate analysis of 11,497 procedures over 12 years. Gastrointest Endosc 2009;70:80-8
  12. Cheng C-L, Sherman S, Watkins JL, et al. Risk Factors for Post-ERCP Pancreatitis: A Prospective Multicenter Study. Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101:139-47
  13. Verma D, Gostout CJ, Petersen BT, et al. Establishing a true assessment of endoscopic competence in ERCP during training and beyond: a single-operator learning curve for deep biliary cannulation in patients with native papillary anatomy. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 65:394-400
  14. Ekkelenkamp V, Koch A, Rauws E, et al. Competence development in ERCP: the learning curve of novice trainees. Endoscopy 2014;46:949-55
  15. Wani S, Hall M, Wang AY, et al. Variation in learning curves and competence for ERCP among advanced endoscopy trainees by using cumulative sum analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2016;83:711-9
  16. Testoni PA, Marian