Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2021 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 4

The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the"parental satisfaction with caregiving for children withdevelopmental disabilities" scale

Pages
772–777
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the analysis, KMO value was 0.795; Bartlett's valuewas also determined as 580.692, which was found statistically significant (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Parents of children with special needs face many difficulties.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Results: The coefficient of Cronbach Alpha was 0.848 and that had a high degree of reliability.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the analysis, KMO value was 0.795; Bartlett's valuewas also determined as 580.692, which was found statistically significant (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: Parents of children with special needs face many difficulties. Additional support may be required for parents who are notsatisfied with their disabled child's care. This study aimed to develop the Turkish validity and reliability study of "parental satisfactionwith caregiving for children with developmental disabilities", which is evaluated the satisfaction of the parent who gives the carechild with a special need.Materials and Methods: This study included one hundred forty-seven parents, who gave care of children with intellectual disabilityand autism spectrum disorder. Detailed information gave to participants and their informed consent was obtained. Student t, Mann Whitney U, Anova and Kruskal Wallis tests were used for statistical evaluation. Results: The coefficient of Cronbach Alpha was 0.848 and that had a high degree of reliability. The coefficient of Cronbach Alpha ofthe satisfaction with the child was 0.812 and personal satisfaction was 0.784. In the analysis, KMO value was 0.795; Bartlett's valuewas also determined as 580.692, which was found statistically significant (p

🔖

Cite This Article

DOĞRU, H., ÇAKIR, A. (2022). The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the"parental satisfaction with caregiving for children withdevelopmental disabilities" scale. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 4, 772–777. https://ajindex.com/articles/445807

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Gupta, A, Singhal N. Positive perceptions in parents of children with disabilities. Asia Pac Disabil Rehabil J 2004;15:22-35
  2. Hassall R, Rose J, McDonald J. Parenting stress in mothers of children with an intellectual disability: The effects of parental cognitions in relation to child characteristics and family support. J Intellect Disabil Res 200;49:405-18
  3. Cleary PD, McNeil BJ. Patient satisfaction as an indicator of quality care. Inquiry 1998;25:25-36
  4. Tehee E, Honan R, Hevey D. Factors contributing to stress in parents of individuals with autistic spectrumdisorders. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil 2009;22:34-42
  5. Carpenter B, Herbert E. The peripheral parent: Research issues and reflections on the role of fathers inearly intervention. PMLD Link 1994;19:16-25
  6. Davys D, Mitchell D, Martin R. Fathers of people with intellectual disability: A review of the literature. J Intellect Disabil 2017;21:175-196
  7. Uzun Cicek A, Sari SA, Mercan Isık C. Sociodemographic Characteristics, Risk Factors, and Prevalence of Comorbidity among Children and Adolescents with Intellectual Disability: A Cross-sectional Study. J Ment Health Res Intellect Disabil 2006;13:66-85
  8. Taunt HM, Hastings RP. Positive impact of children with developmental disabilities on their families: A preliminary study. Educ Train Ment Ret Dev Dis 2002;37:410-20
  9. Benson B, Dewey D. Parental stress and needs in families of children with autism spectrum disorder. Int. J Disabil Commun Rehabil 2008;7:1-9
  10. John A. Stress among mothers of children with intellectual disabilities in urban India: Role of gender andmaternal coping. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil 2012;25:372-82
  11. Ali A, Hassiotis A, Strydom A, et al. Self-stigma in people with intellectual disabilities and courtesystigma in family carers: A systematic review. Res Dev Disabil 2012;33:2122-40
  12. Edwardraj S, Mumtaj K, Prasad JH, et al.Perceptions about intellectual disability: A qualitative study from Vellore, South India. J Intell Disabil Res 2010;54:736- 48
  13. Shobana M, Saravanan C. Comparative study on attitudes and psychological problems of mothers towardstheir children with developmental disability. East Asian Arch. Psychiatry 2014;24:16
  14. Mourya RK, Singh RN, Rai A. Stigma in the Social Life among Mothers Having Children with Intellectual Disabilities: Challenges and Suggestions. Int J Indian Psychol 2016;3. DIP: 18.01.198/20160303
  15. Samadi SA, Abdollahi-Boghrabadi G, McConkey R. Parental satisfaction wi