Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2021 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 7

Comparison of colposcopic biopsy results of cervicalcytology-negative and HPV 16/18 or other high-risk HPVsubtypes

Pages
1366–1370
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Colposcopic biopsy is unnecessary in the presence of NILM and other high-risk HPV types.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: This study aimed to compare the colposcopic biopsy results of patients with negative cervical cytology and positive human papillomavirus (HPV) tests and to investigate the necessity of colposcopy in patients with cytology-negative/other high-risk HPV (non-HPV 16/18) positive results.Materials and Methods: The study included 126 patients aged 30–65 years who underwent HPV DNA testing between 2016 and 2019 and who underwent colposcopic biopsy at our hospital because of their positive results.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The patients were divided into three groups: HPV16/18 positivity, other high-risk HPV positivity, and unclassified HPV positivity.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Colposcopic biopsy is unnecessary in the presence of NILM and other high-risk HPV types.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to compare the colposcopic biopsy results of patients with negative cervical cytology and positive human papillomavirus (HPV) tests and to investigate the necessity of colposcopy in patients with cytology-negative/other high-risk HPV (non-HPV 16/18) positive results.Materials and Methods: The study included 126 patients aged 30–65 years who underwent HPV DNA testing between 2016 and 2019 and who underwent colposcopic biopsy at our hospital because of their positive results. The patients were divided into three groups: HPV16/18 positivity, other high-risk HPV positivity, and unclassified HPV positivity. Cytology and colposcopy-guided cervical biopsy results were compared with the HPV types.Results: Approximately 44.4% of the patients had HPV 16/18 positivity, 23% had other high-risk HPV positivity, and 32.5% had unclassified HPV positivity. The cytology results revealed that 57.1% of patients were negative for intraepithelial lesions or malignancy (NILM), 22.2% had atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance, 17.5% had low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LGSIL), and 2.4% had high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions. Colposcopic biopsy results were normal in 15.1% of the patients, showed LGSIL in 15.9%, high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HGSIL) in 10.3%, and cervical cancer in 0.8% of the patients. Evaluation of the biopsy results based on HPV type in the patients with NILM cytology revealed that 12.8% of those with HPV 16/18 positivity had LGSIL and 17.9% had HGSIL, whereas 7.1% of those with other high-risk HPV positivity had HGSIL and 7.1% had LGSIL.Conclusions: The possibility of detecting dysplasia in the colposcopic biopsies of patients who are NILM and HPV 16/18-positive is higher than in the colposcopic biopsies of patients with other high-risk HPV types; therefore, these patients should be evaluated using colposcopic biopsy. Colposcopic biopsy is unnecessary in the presence of NILM and other high-risk HPV types.

🔖

Cite This Article

SERT, Z. S. (2022). Comparison of colposcopic biopsy results of cervicalcytology-negative and HPV 16/18 or other high-risk HPVsubtypes. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 7, 1366–1370. https://ajindex.com/articles/445780

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Zandberg DP, Bhargava R, Badin S, et al. The role of human papillomavirus in nongenital cancers. CA Cancer J Clin 2013;63:57-81
  2. Munoz N, Bosch FX, de Sanjose S, et al. Epidemiologic classification of human papillomavirus types associated with cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 2003;348:518-27
  3. Clifford GM, Smith JS, Plummer M, et al. Human papillomavirus types in invasive cervical cancer worldwide: a meta-analysis. Br J Cancer 2003;88:63- 73
  4. De Sanjose S, Quint WG, Alemany L, et al. Retrospective International Survey and HPV Time Trends Study Group. Human papillomavirus genotype attribution in invasive cervical cancer: a retrospective cross-sectional worldwide study. Lancet Oncol 2010;11:1048-56
  5. Poomtavorn Y, Suwannarurk K. Accuracy of visual inspection with acetic acid in detecting highgrade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in pre- and post-menopausal Thai women with minor cervical cytological abnormalities. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2015;16:2327-31
  6. Kingnate C, Supoken A, Kleebkaow P, et al. Is Age an Independent Predictor of High-Grade Histopathology in Women Referred for Colposcopy after Abnormal Cervical Cytology? Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2015;16:7231-5
  7. Massad LS, Einstein MH, Huh WK, et al. 2012 updated consensus guidelines for the management of abnormal cervical cancer screening tests and cancer precursors. Obstet Gynecol 2013;121:829-46
  8. Solomon D, Davey D, Kurman R, et al. The 2001 Bethesda System: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology. JAMA 2002;287:2114-9
  9. Massad LS, Einstein MH, Huh WK, et al. 2012 ASCCP Consensus Guidelines Conference. 2012 updated consensus guidelines for the management of abnormal cervical cancer screening tests and cancer precursors. Obstet Gynecol 2013;121:829-46
  10. Schiffman M, Burk RD, Boyle S, et al. A study of genotyping for management of human papillomaviruspositive, cytology-negative cervical screening results. J Clin Microbiol 2015;53:52-9
  11. Carozzi F, Ronco G, Confortini M, et al. Prediction of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in cytologically normal women by human papillomavirus testing. Br J Cancer 2000;83:1462-7
  12. Kinney W, Fetterman B, Cox JT, et al. Characteristics of 44 cervical cancers diagnosed following Papnegative, high risk HPV-positive screening in routine clinical practice. Gynecol Oncol 2011;121:309-13
  13. Schiffman M, Castle PE, Jeronimo J, et al. Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer. Lancet 2007;370:890-907
  14. Saslow D, Solomon