Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2021 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 2

Risk factors for anastomotic leakage and stricturefollowing rectal cancer surgery: A retrospective cohortstudy

Pages
352–360
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Male sex, intersphincteric resection with coloanal anastomosis, and diameter of tumor can be significant risk factors for the development of any anastomotic complication including anastomotic leakage following rectal cancer surgery.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Anastomotic problems including anastomotic leakage and stricture following rectal cancer surgery are complications with indefinite risk factors.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Patients who underwent surgical treatment after neoadjuvant treatment for middle and distal rectal tumors were retrospectively analyzed between January 2016 and September 2019.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Male sex, intersphincteric resection with coloanal anastomosis, and diameter of tumor can be significant risk factors for the development of any anastomotic complication including anastomotic leakage following rectal cancer surgery.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: Anastomotic problems including anastomotic leakage and stricture following rectal cancer surgery are complications with indefinite risk factors. It was aimed to evaluate preoperative and postoperative risk factors for anastomotic leakage and stricture in patients who underwent rectal cancer surgery. Materials and Methods: Patients who underwent surgical treatment after neoadjuvant treatment for middle and distal rectal tumors were retrospectively analyzed between January 2016 and September 2019. All consecutive patients who were older than 18 years and treated via low anterior resection with colorectal anastomosis or intersphincteric resection with coloanal anastomosis with diverting ileostomy were included. Patients with and without any anastomotic complications were grouped as Group 1 and 2, respectively. Subgroup analysis based on anastomotic leakage and stricture was also performed. Results: There were 62 patients with a mean age of 60.5±12.2 years. Anastomotic complications occurred in 11 patients (17.7%). There were seven (11.3%) anastomotic leakage and six (9.7%) anastomotic stricture. Male patients were significantly higher in Group 1 (p=0.018). Anastomotic leakage was seen more commonly in male patients (p=0.035). Intersphincteric resection with hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis and the diameter of the tumor was significantly associated with anastomotic leakage (p=0.002 and p=0.004, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that male sex for the development of any anastomotic complication, and handsewn coloanal anastomosis, and tumor diameter for anastomotic leakage were independent risk factors. Conclusion: Male sex, intersphincteric resection with coloanal anastomosis, and diameter of tumor can be significant risk factors for the development of any anastomotic complication including anastomotic leakage following rectal cancer surgery.

🔖

Cite This Article

USTA, M. A., ÇEKİÇ, A. B. (2022). Risk factors for anastomotic leakage and stricturefollowing rectal cancer surgery: A retrospective cohortstudy. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 2, 352–360. https://ajindex.com/articles/445756

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Kim JC, Lee JL, Kim CW, et al. Mechanotechnical faults and particular issues of anastomotic complications following robot-assisted anterior resection in 968 rectal cancer patients. J Surg Oncol 2019;120:1436- 45
  2. Lee S, Ahn B, Lee S. The relationship between the number of intersections of staple lines and anastomotic leakage after the use of a double stapling technique in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2017;27:273-81
  3. Qin Q, Ma T, Deng Y, et al. Impact of preoperative radiotherapy on anastomotic leakage and stenosis after rectal cancer resection: post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2016;59:934-42
  4. Lee SY, Kim CH, Kim YJ, et al. Anastomotic stricture after ultralow anterior resection or intersphincteric resection for very low-lying rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 2018;32:660-6
  5. Hiraki M, Tanaka T, Ikeda O, et al. Retrospective risk analysis for anastomotic leakage following laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery in a single institute. J Gastrointest Cancer 2020;51:908-13
  6. Zhu H, Bai B, Shan L, et al. Preoperative radiotherapy for patients with rectal cancer: a risk factor for nonreversal of ileostomy caused by stenosis or stiffness proximal to colorectal anastomosis. Oncotarget 2017;8:100746-53
  7. Wang XT, Li L, Kong FB, et al. Surgical-related risk factors associated with anastomotic leakage after resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2020;50:20-8
  8. Olsen BC, Sakkestad ST, Pfeffer F, et al. Rate of Anastomotic Leakage After Rectal Anastomosis Depends on the Definition: Pelvic Abscesses are Significant. Scand J Surg 2019;108:241-9
  9. Zhang B, Zhuo GZ, Tian L, et al. Risk factors of coloanal anastomotic stricture after laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. Chinese J Gastrointestinal Surg 2019;22:755-61
  10. Park EJ, Kang J, Hur H, et al. Different clinical features according to the anastomotic leakage subtypes after rectal cancer surgeries: contained vs. free leakages PLoS One 2018;13:e0208572
  11. Rahbari NN, Weitz J, Hohenberger W, et al. Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a proposal by the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer. Surgery 2010;147:339- 51
  12. Sciuto A, Merola G, De Palma GD, et al. Predictive factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. World J Gastroenterol 2018;24:2247-60
  13. Reif de Paula T, Simon H, Shah M, et al. Analys