Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2021 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 4

Comparison of the effect of two different intravenousmethylprednisolone doses on the occurrence time ofbiphasic reaction

Pages
646–651
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Theadministration of two different doses of methylprednisolone has no effect on biphasic reaction development time.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of this study is to determine the effect of two different doses of methylprednisolone administered in our emergencydepartment (ED) on the elapsed time in biphasic or recurrent anaphylaxis cases.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 82 patientswho received methylprednisolone in combination with epinephrine in the ED due to anaphylaxis and who developed biphasicreaction within 48 h after discharge were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Theadministration of two different doses of methylprednisolone has no effect on biphasic reaction development time.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study is to determine the effect of two different doses of methylprednisolone administered in our emergencydepartment (ED) on the elapsed time in biphasic or recurrent anaphylaxis cases. Materials and Methods: The patients with anaphylaxis admitted to the ED were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 82 patientswho received methylprednisolone in combination with epinephrine in the ED due to anaphylaxis and who developed biphasicreaction within 48 h after discharge were included in the study. The patients were classified into two groups according to the doseof methylprednisolone administered: 80 mg (Group 1, low-dose) and 120 mg (Group 2, high-dose). The effect of different doses ofmethylprednisolone on the development time of biphasic reaction was evaluated. Results: Two different doses of IV methylprednisolone administered in the ED did not affect the development time of biphasicreaction (p = 0.24). The biphasic reaction development times were 335 (IQR, 212–950) min in the low-dose group and 520 (IQR, 265– 1150) min in the high-dose group. The earliest development time of biphasic reaction was 125 min (low-dose group) and the latestdevelopment time was 2270 min (high-dose group). The relationship between dose and biphasic reaction development times wasevaluated using Kaplan–Meier curve. No significant difference was observed between the two groups (p = 0.28). Upon comparingthe symptoms in patients’ second admission to the ED due to biphasic reaction, no statistically significant difference was observedin patient symptoms with respect to the dose administered (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Corticosteroids are often used in ED, although there is no definitive evidence that they prevent biphasic reactions. Theadministration of two different doses of methylprednisolone has no effect on biphasic reaction development time.

🔖

Cite This Article

MUTLU, H., KOKULU, K., SERT, E. T., PARLAK, İ. (2022). Comparison of the effect of two different intravenousmethylprednisolone doses on the occurrence time ofbiphasic reaction. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 4, 646–651. https://ajindex.com/articles/445743

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Simons FE, Ardusso LR, Bilo MB, et al. International consensus on (ICON) anaphylaxis. World Allergy Organ J 2014;7:9
  2. Lee S, Hess EP, Lohse C, et al. Trends, characteristics, andincidence of anaphylaxis in 2001-2010: A population-basedstudy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2017;139:182-8
  3. Simons FE. Anaphylaxis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2010;125:161-81
  4. Simons FE. Anaphylaxis: Recent advances in assessment and treatment. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2009;124:625-36
  5. Lee S, Sadosty AT, Campbell RL. Update on biphasic anaphylaxis. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2016;16:346-51
  6. Grunau BE, Li J, Yi TW, et al. Incidence of clinically important biphasic reactions in emergency department patients with allergic reactions or anaphylaxis. Ann Emerg Med 2014;63:736-44
  7. Lee JM, Greenes DS. Biphasic Anaphylactic Reaction In Pediatrics. Pediatrics 2000;106:762-6
  8. Lee S, Bellolio MF, Hess EP, et al. Predictors of biphasic reactions in the emergency department for patients with anaphylaxis. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2014;2:281-7
  9. Umland SP, Schleimer RP, Johnston SL. Review of the molecular and cellular mechanisms of action of glucocorticoids foruse in asthma. Pulm Pharmacol Ther 2002;15:35-50
  10. Sampson HA, Muñoz-Furlong A, Campbell RL, et al. Second Symposium on the Definition and Management of Anaphylaxis: Summary Report – Second National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease/Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Network Symposium. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2006;117:391-7
  11. Croxtall JD, Choudhury Q, Flower RJ. Glucocorticoids act within minutes to inhibit recruitment of signalling factors to activated EGF receptors through a receptordependent, transcription-independent mechanism. Br J Pharmacol 2000;130:289-98
  12. Inagaki N, Miura T, Nagai H, et al. Inhibitory effects of glucocorticoids on increased vascular permeability caused by passive cutaneous anaphylaxis and some chemical mediators in rats. Jpn J Pharmacol 1988;46:189-92
  13. Mertes, PM, Malinovsky JM, Jouffroy L, et al. Reducing the risk of anaphylaxis during anesthesia: 2011 updated guidelines for clinical practice. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 2011;21:442-53
  14. Lieberman P, Nicklas RA, Randolph C, et al. Anaphylaxis--a practice parameter update 2015. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2015;115:341-84
  15. A Cheng. Emergency treatment of anaphylaxis in infants and children. Paediatr Child Health 2011;16:35- 40
  16. Campbell RL, Li JT, Nicklas RA, et al. Members of the Joint Task Force; Practice Para