Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2021 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 10

Comparison of the renal response of bortezomib-based induction and conventional regimen in multiple myeloma patients with renal failure

Pages
1824–1829
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Overall renal response rate (at least minor response) in the VCD group at the end of the 1st month were higher than in the VAD group (p=0.002).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Vincristine-doxorubicin-dexamethasone (VAD) was the commonly used first-line treatment for multiple myeloma (MM) patients with renal failure before bortezomib entered clinical practice.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: The records of MM patients in our center between January 2010 and February 2020 were retrospectively analyzed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Overall renal response rate (at least minor response) in the VCD group at the end of the 1st month were higher than in the VAD group (p=0.002).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: Vincristine-doxorubicin-dexamethasone (VAD) was the commonly used first-line treatment for multiple myeloma (MM) patients with renal failure before bortezomib entered clinical practice. In this trial, we aimed to compare the effect of VAD and bortezomibcyclophosphamide-dexamethasone (VCD) chemotherapy regimens on improving kidney function in MM patients with renal failure. Materials and Methods: The records of MM patients in our center between January 2010 and February 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients who received VAD or VCD as a first treatment chemotherapy protocol and whose initially estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 50 mL/min/1.73 m2and below were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups according to the chemotherapy regimens they received. Results: Sixty one MM patients (VAD: 26, VCD: 35) were included in the study. No significant difference was found between the VAD and VCD groups when the baseline, 1st and 2nd month eGFRs were compared (p>0.05). Overall renal response rate (at least minor response) in the VCD group at the end of the 1st month were higher than in the VAD group (p=0.002). Also, renal response rate in the VCD group at the end of the 2nd month were higher than in the VAD group (p=0.033). Conclusion: In MM patients with renal insufficiency, overall renal response rates have increased with the use of VCD instead of VAD as a standard induction regimen.

🔖

Cite This Article

Tanriverdi, L. H., Kaya, E., Erkurt, M. A., Sarici, A., Berber, I., Bahcecioglu, O. F., Gok, S., Kuku, I. (2022). Comparison of the renal response of bortezomib-based induction and conventional regimen in multiple myeloma patients with renal failure. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 10, 1824–1829. https://ajindex.com/articles/445738

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Blade J. Multiple Myeloma. In: Carreras E, Dufour C, Mohty M (eds) The EBMT Handbook. Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapies. Cham: Springer, 2019.p.603-7 2. Eleutherakis-Papaiakovou V, Bamias A, Gika D, et al. Renal failure in multiple myeloma: incidence, correlations, and prognostic significance. Leukemıa Lymphoma 2007;48:337-41. 3. Bladé J, Fernández-Llama P, Bosch F, et al. Renal failure in multiple myeloma: presenting features and predictors of outcome in 94 patients from a single institution. Arch Intern Med 1998;158:1889-93. 4. Yadav P, Cook M, Cockwell P. Current trends of renal impairment in multiple myeloma. Kidney Dis (Basel) 2015;1:241-57. 5. Batuman V. The pathogenesis of acute kidney impairment in patients with multiple myeloma. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis 2012;19:282-6. 6. Gonsalves WI, Leung N, Rajkumar SV, et al. Improvement in renal function and its impact on survival in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Blood Cancer J 2015; 5:e296. 7. Dimopoulos MA, Delimpasi S, Katodritou E, et al. Significant improvement in the survival of patients with multiple myeloma presenting with severe renal impairment after the introduction of novel agents. Ann Oncol 2014;25:195-200. 8. Uttervall K, Duru AD, Lund J, et al. The use of novel drugs can effectively improve response, delay relapse and enhance overall survival in multiple myeloma patients with renal impairment. PLoS One 2014;9:e101819. 9. Ludwig H, Miguel JS, Dimopoulos MA, et al. International Myeloma Working Group recommendations for global myeloma care. Leukemia 2014;28:981-92. 10. Dimopoulos MA, Kastritis E, Rosinol L, et al. Pathogenesis and treatment of renal failure in multiple myeloma. Leukemia 2008;22:1485-93. 11. Dimopoulos MA, Sonneveld P, Leung N, et al. International Myeloma Working Group Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Management of Myeloma-Related Renal Impairment. J Clin Oncol 2016;34:1544-57. 12. MacLennan ICM, Coope EH, Chapman CE, et al. Renal failure in myelomatosis. Eur J Haematol 1989;43:60-5 13. Augustson BM, Begum G, Dunn JA, et al. Early mortality after diagnosis of multiple myeloma: analysis of patients entered onto the United Kingdom Medical Research Council trials between 1980 and 2002-Medical Research Council Adult Leukaemia Working Party. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:9219-26. 14. Knudsen LM, Hjorth M and Hippe E. Renal failure in multiple myeloma: reversibility and impact on the prognosis Nordic Myeloma Study Group. Eur J Haematol 2000;6