SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2021 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 9

Comparison of the effects of intravenous fluids and vasoconstrictive agents on the hemodynamic response developing in spinal anaesthesia

Belkis Tanriverdi
Yildirim Gultekin
Kemal Kaplan
Pages
1746–1753
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: As a result, it has been shown that norepinephrine, ephedrine, and 0.9% NaCl solution are similarly effective in preventing hypotension from developing after spinal anaesthesia.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The study’s aim was to compare the effects of norepinephrine, ephedrine, and 0.9% sodium chloride (NaCl) solution against the hemodynamic response that develops after spinal anaesthesia.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: The study was conducted on 80 patients who were scheduled for surgery onlower extremity varicose veins, and they were divided into four groups.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: As a result, it has been shown that norepinephrine, ephedrine, and 0.9% NaCl solution are similarly effective in preventing hypotension from developing after spinal anaesthesia.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The study’s aim was to compare the effects of norepinephrine, ephedrine, and 0.9% sodium chloride (NaCl) solution against the hemodynamic response that develops after spinal anaesthesia. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted on 80 patients who were scheduled for surgery onlower extremity varicose veins, and they were divided into four groups. Group F was started with a 0.9% NaCl solution of 15ml/kg 20 minutes before spinal anaesthesia. For 20 minutes after spinal anaesthesia, Group E received 2mg/min of ephedrine and Group N received 5mic/min norepinephrine as an infusion. Meanwhile, Group C was not given any medication or fluid. Spinal anaesthesia was performed with 0.5% bupivacaine. The systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), heart rate (HR), and peripheral oxygen saturation (SPO2) values of the patients were recorded before and after the procedure. Sensorial block levels and degrees of motor block were also recorded after the operation. In addition, side effects other than hypotension that may develop after the surgery were also recorded. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of SBP, DBP, SPO2, HR, sensory block level, and degree of motor block (p>0.05). In Group C, the decrease in SBP and DBP values that occurred at the fifteenth, twentieth, and thirtieth minutes of spinal anaesthesia was statistically significant when compared with the control values (SBP: p=0.0274, 0.0028, 0.0036, and DBP: p=0.0132, 0.0210, 0.0041). Hypotension developed in 10 (50%) of the 20 patients in Group C, and a 10mg intravenous (IV) bolus intervened with ephedrine. This result was statistically significant when compared with Group F, Group E, and Group N (p=0.005). Conclusion: As a result, it has been shown that norepinephrine, ephedrine, and 0.9% NaCl solution are similarly effective in preventing hypotension from developing after spinal anaesthesia.

🔖

Cite This Article

Tanriverdi, B., Gultekin, Y., Kaplan, K. (2022). Comparison of the effects of intravenous fluids and vasoconstrictive agents on the hemodynamic response developing in spinal anaesthesia. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 9, 1746–1753. https://ajindex.com/articles/445718

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Erdine S. Spinal Anesthesia. In: Nerve Blocks. 1st ed. Emre Printing, Istanbul,1993;49-80
  2. Kayhan Z. Central Blocks (Spinal ve epidural anestezi). In: Clinical Anesthesia. Extended 3rd ed. Logos Printing, Istanbul, 2004;552-89
  3. Albright G, Forster R. Spinal analgesia-physiolgic effects. In: Collins VJ Ed. Principles of anesthesiology. 3rd ed. Philedelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1993. p. 1445-570
  4. Esener Z. Epidural Anesthesia. In: Clinical Anesthesia, 1st ed. Logos Printing, Istanbul, 1995;363-74
  5. Goktuna S. Comparison of Intrathecal 0.5% Hyperbaric Bupivacaine and 0.5% Hyperbaric BupivacaineMorphine Combination Applications in unilateral inguinal hernia operations in terms of Hemodynamic Stability, Sensory and Motor Block and Postoperative Analgesia. Master thesis. Haydarpasa Numune Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, 2006
  6. Erdine S. Epidural Anesthesia. In: Rejyonal Anesthesia. 1st ed. Nobel Medical Bookstores, Istanbul. 2005;7-43
  7. Kayhan Z. Interventional Methods. In: Clinical Anesthesia. 2th ed. Logos Printing Istanbul, 1997;482- 9
  8. Morgan GE, Mikhail MS, Murray MJ, Larson CP. Regional Anesthesia. İn: Clinical Anesthesiology (LANGE). 3rd ed. Gunes Bookstore Ankara, 2004;260-9
  9. Morgan P. The role of vasopressors in the management of hypotension induced by spinal and epidural anaesthesia. Can j anaesth 1994;41:404-13 10. Noor MG, Raymond AV, Nicholas AP, et al. Comparison of an Ephedrine Infusion with Crystalloid Administration for Prevention of Hypotension During Spinal Anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1993;76:1023-6 11. Hemmingsen C, Poulsen JA, Risbo A. Prophylactic ephedrine during spinal anaesthesia: Double- blind study in patients in ASA groups. Mil. Br J Anaesth 1989;63:340-2
  10. Hall PA, Bennett A, Wilkes MP, et al. Spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: comparison of infusions of phenylephrine and ephedrine. Br J Anaesth 1994;73:471-4
  11. Somboonviboon W, Kyokong O, Charuluxananan S, et al. Incidence and risk factors of hypotension and bradycardia after spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. J Med Assoc Thai 2008;91:181-7
  12. Bhagwanjee S, Rocke DA, Rout CC, et al. Prevention of hypotension following spinal anaesthesia for elective caesarean section by wrapping of the legs. Br J Anaesth. 1990;65:819-22
  13. Wollman SB, Marx GF. Acute hydration for prevention of hypotension of spinal anesthesia in parturients. Anesthesiology 1968;29:374-80
  14. Mishler JM. Synthetic plasma volume expanders - their pharmacology, safety and