Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2021 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 4

A single center surgical experience in total laparoscopichysterectomy and the effect of variables on operationtime: Do the uterine volume and the suture type influencethe operation time?

Pages
716–721
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The type of suture material provided an importantdifference in the operation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Total laparoscopic hysterectomy has several advantages compared to laparotomy including shorter hospitalization, fasterrecovery time, less pain, and less hemorrhage.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Our aim was to determine the relationship between patient-specific/surgery-relatedvariables and operation times in this study.Materials and Methods: We recruited 191 patients who underwent total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The type of suture material provided an importantdifference in the operation.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: Total laparoscopic hysterectomy has several advantages compared to laparotomy including shorter hospitalization, fasterrecovery time, less pain, and less hemorrhage. Our aim was to determine the relationship between patient-specific/surgery-relatedvariables and operation times in this study.Materials and Methods: We recruited 191 patients who underwent total laparoscopic hysterectomy. We compared variables includinguterine volume, surgical suture materials, and body mass index with operation time. The study was performed with the permissionof the Training Plan and Coordination Board Committee of our institution (18/06/2019- No: 10). Results: The uterine volume and body mass index of the patient did not influence the operation time whereas the suturing techniqueby the laparoscopic approach substantially affected the operating time (p=0.902, p=0.117 and p=0.012, respectively). There was astatistically significant difference between suture type and operation time. The cases that used barbed sutures required a shorteroperation time.Conclusion: We investigated the relationship between interesting entities such as uterine volume, type of suture material, andoperation times. Laparoscopy should be performed widely in suitable cases. The type of suture material provided an importantdifference in the operation.

🔖

Cite This Article

DURMUŞ, Y., BORAN, N., KAYIKÇIOĞLU, F., BOSTANCI, E. İ., GÜNEŞ, S. (2022). A single center surgical experience in total laparoscopichysterectomy and the effect of variables on operationtime: Do the uterine volume and the suture type influencethe operation time?. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 4, 716–721. https://ajindex.com/articles/445705

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Garry R. The future of hysterectomy. BJOG 2005;112: 133-9
  2. Whiteman MK, Hillis SD, Jamieson DJ, et al. Inpatient hysterectomy surveillance in the United States. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol 2008;198:1-7
  3. Reich H, De Caprio J, Mac Glynn F. Laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Gynecol Coll 1989;5:213
  4. Mage G, Wattiez A, Chapron C, et al. Laparoscopic hysterectomy. Results in 44 cases. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 1992;21:436-44
  5. Terzi H, Biber A, Demirtas O, et al. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy: Analysis of the surgical learning curve in benign conditions. Int J Surg 2016;35:51-7
  6. Kim SM, Park EK, Jeung IC, et al. Abdominal, multi-port and single-port total laparoscopic hysterectomy:eleven-year trends comparison of surgical outcomes complications of 936 cases. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2015;291:1313-9
  7. Matteson A, Butts SF. ACOG Committee Opinion No.701: Choosing the Route of Hysterectomy for Benign Disease. Obstet Gynecol 2017;129:155-9
  8. Donnez O, Jadoul P, Squifflet J, et al. A series of 3190 laparoscopic hysterectomies for benign disease from 1990 to 2006: evaluation of complications compared with vaginal and abdominal procedures. BJOG 2009;116:492-500
  9. Bojahr B, Raatz D, Schonleber G, et al. Perioperative complication rate in 1706 patients after a standardized laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy technique. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2006;13:183-9
  10. Karaman Y, Bingol M, Gunenc Z. Prevention of complications in laparoscopic hysterectomy: experience with 1120 cases performed by a single surgeon. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2007;14:78-84
  11. Naveiro-Fuentes M, Rodrıguez-Oliver A, FernandezParra J, et al. Effect of surgeon’s experience on complications from laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2017;11:63-67
  12. Mavrova R, Radosa JC, Wagenpfeil G, et al. Learning curves for laparoscopic hysterectomy after implementation of minimally invasive surgery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2016;134:225–30
  13. Goldstein SR, Horii SC, Snyder JR, et al. Estimation of nongravid uterine volume based on a nomogram of gravid uterine volume: its value in gynecologic uterine abnormalities. Obstet Gynecol 1988;72:86-90
  14. Desimone CP, Ueland FR. Gynecologic laparoscopy. Surg Clin North Am 2008;88:319-41
  15. He H, Zeng D, Ou H, et al. Laparoscopic treatment of endometrial cancer: systematic review. J Minimal Invasive Gynecol 2013;20:413-23
  16. Lopez CC, De Los Rios JF, Gonzalez Y, et al. Barbed Suture Versus Conventional Suture for Vaginal Cuff Closur