Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2021 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 2

Evaluation of long-term mortality in patients with stable angina pectoris whose SYNTAX score was found to be zero in coronary angiography

Pages
369–375
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, appropriate risk classification, life style changes and appropriate medical follow-up may be important in these patients.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The number of diagnostic coronary angiography is increasing.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Although previously thought that non-obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) does not cause an increase in mortality risk, there is recently evidence that it increases mortality.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, appropriate risk classification, life style changes and appropriate medical follow-up may be important in these patients.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The number of diagnostic coronary angiography is increasing. Although previously thought that non-obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) does not cause an increase in mortality risk, there is recently evidence that it increases mortality. In this study, we aimed to determine the mortality rates and possible predictors of all-cause death in long-term follow-up of patients who underwent coronary angiography (CAG) due to stable angina and whose SYNTAX score was zero including normal coronary arteries, minimal CAD or non-obstructive CAD, coronary slow flow, coronary artery aneurysms and ectasia. Materials and Methods: This study included 1489 patients who underwent CAG due to stable angina pectoris. In-hospital and post-discharge follow-up data were obtained. Patients' CAG images were evaluated and SYNTAX scores were calculated using the website calculator. Results: Among the 1489 patients, 64 (4.3%) all-cause deaths were observed during the 19 ± 1.1 months of follow up period. Although, no significant difference was observed between the 2 groups in terms of the presence of plaque in coronary arteries with a vessel diameter of ≤ 1.5 mm, the rate of patients with plaque in coronary arteries with a diameter of > 1.5 mm was significantly higher in the group of patients who died compared to the patients living (48 (75%) vs 842 (% 59.1), p = 0.011). The cumulative survival curve of the patients was obtained and in patients with coronary plaque in any of the coronary arteries with a vessel diameter of > 1.5 mm was significantly associated with worse survival. Conclusion: There was increase in all-cause mortality in patients who underwent CAG due to stable angina and who have at least one non-obstructive lesion in the coronary arteries > 1.5 mm. Therefore, appropriate risk classification, life style changes and appropriate medical follow-up may be important in these patients.

🔖

Cite This Article

BURAK, C., İLİŞ, D., KARAKURT, A. (2022). Evaluation of long-term mortality in patients with stable angina pectoris whose SYNTAX score was found to be zero in coronary angiography. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 2, 369–375. https://ajindex.com/articles/445689

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Patel MR, Peterson ED, Dai D, et al. Low diagnostic yield of elective coronary angiography. N Engl J Med 2010;362:886-95
  2. Johnston N, Schenck-Gustafsson K, Lagerqvist. Are we using cardiovascular medications and coronary angiography appropriately in men and women with chest pain? Eur Heart J 2011;32:1331-6
  3. Lee BK, Lim HS, Fearon WF, et al. Invasive evaluation of patients with angina in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease. Circulation 2015;131:1054- 60
  4. Jespersen L, Hvelplund A, Abildstrom SZ, et al. Stable angina pectoris with no obstructive coronary artery disease is associated with increased risks of major adverse cardiovascular events. Eur Heart J 2012;33:734-44
  5. Sianos G, Morel MA, Kappetein AP,et al. The SYNTAX Score: an angiographic tool grading the complexity of coronary artery disease. EuroIntervention 2005;1:219- 27
  6. Head SJ, Milojevic M, Daemen J, et al. Mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting for coronary artery disease: a pooled analysis of individual patient data. Lancet 2018;391:939-48
  7. Beltrame JF, Limaye SB, Horowitz JD. The coronary slow flow phenomenon--a new coronary microvascular disorder. Cardiology 2002;97:197-202
  8. Gibson CM, Cannon CP, Daley WL, et al. TIMI frame count: a quantitative method of assessing coronary artery flow. Circulation 1996;93:879-88
  9. Swaye PS, Fisher LD, Litwin P, et al. Aneurysmal coronary artery disease. Circulation 1983;67:134-8
  10. Angelini P, Velasco JA, Flamm S. Coronary anomalies: incidence, pathophysiology, and clinical relevance. Circulation 2002;105:2449-54
  11. Chiu CZ, Shyu KG, Cheng JJ, et al. Angiographic and clinical manifestations of coronary fistulas in Chinese people: 15-year experience. Circ J 2008;72:1242-8
  12. Ridker P, Libby P. Risk markers for atherothrombotic disease. Saunders 2012:914-31
  13. Qin R, Chen T, Lou Q, et al. Excess risk of mortality and cardiovascular events associated with smoking among patients with diabetes: Meta-analysis of observational prospective studies. Meta-Analysis 2013;167:342-50
  14. Kannel WB. Blood pressure as a cardiovascular risk factor: prevention and treatment. JAMA 1996;275:1571-6
  15. William BK. Rational for Treatment of Hypertension in the Elderly. Am J Geriatr Cardiol 1994;3:33-45
  16. Wilson PWF KW. Hypertension, other risk factors and the risk of cardiovascular disease.: Raven Press: New York; 1995
  17. Lemieux I, Pascot A, Prud’homme D, et al