Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2021 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 11

Spinal Meningioma: Five-year experience of a single center

Pages
2039–2043
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Due to the slow course of SMs, care should be taken against the possibility of misdiagnosis.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: To discuss the natural history of spinal meningiomas (SMs) in our series, surgical approach options, and pathology results in light of the literature.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: Of the 151 meningioma cases operated on between June 2014 and August 2020 in our center, 11 with spinal localization were analyzed retrospectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Due to the slow course of SMs, care should be taken against the possibility of misdiagnosis.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: To discuss the natural history of spinal meningiomas (SMs) in our series, surgical approach options, and pathology results in light of the literature. Material and Methods: Of the 151 meningioma cases operated on between June 2014 and August 2020 in our center, 11 with spinal localization were analyzed retrospectively. Results: Three (27%) of our cases were male, eight (73%) were female, and 7.2% of all meningioma cases were located in the spine. The patients mostly presented with paraparesis, and 73% of the tumors had a thoracic localization and 64% had a lateral spinal localization. We were able to reach a 90% Simpson grade I resection limit after the opening procedure performed with mostly hemilaminectomy or laminoplasty. The histopathologies of all our cases were reported as meningothelial and transitionally weighted WHO grade I, and their postoperative clinical states showed a favorable progression according to the Karnofsky and McCormick scales. Conclusion: WHO grade I histopathology and thoracic spinal location are predominant in SMs. With low recurrence and mortality rates, favorable outcomes can be obtained with gross total resection in most cases. Due to the slow course of SMs, care should be taken against the possibility of misdiagnosis.

🔖

Cite This Article

Cetinkal, A. (2022). Spinal Meningioma: Five-year experience of a single center. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 11, 2039–2043. https://ajindex.com/articles/445677

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Raco A, Pesce A, Toccaceli G, et al. Factors Leading to a Poor Functional Outcome in Spinal Meningioma Surgery: Remarks on 173 Cases. Neurosurgery 2017;80:602-9
  2. Levy WJ. Bay J, Dohn D. Spinal cord meningioma. J Neurosurg 1982;57:804-12
  3. Parry DM, Eldridge R, Kaiser-Kupfer MI, et al. Neurofibromatosis 2 (NF2): Clinical characteristics of 63 affected individuals and clinical evidence for heterogeneity. Am J Med Genet 1994;52:450-61
  4. Schaller B. Spinal meningioma: relationship between histological subtypes and surgical outcome? Journal of Neuro-Oncology 2005;75:157-61
  5. Helseth A, Mork SJ. Primary intraspinal neoplasms in Norway, 1955 to 1986. A population-based survey of 467 patients. J Neurosurg 1989;71:842-5
  6. Kwee LE, Harhangi BS, Ponne GA, et al. Spinal meningiomas: Treatment outcome and long-term follow-up. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2020;198:106238
  7. Gottfried ON, Gluf W, Quinones-Hinojosa A, et al. Spinal meningiomas: surgical management and outcome. Neurosurg Focus 2003;14:e2
  8. Sung CW, Hsieh KLC, Kuo YJ. A primary meningioma of the lumbar spine with neck metastasis. J Spinal Cord Med 2020;43:888-91
  9. Hollis PH, Malis LI, Zappulla RA: Neurological deterioration after lumbar puncture below complete spinal subarachnoid block. J Neurosurg 1986;64:253– 6
  10. Solero CL, Fornari M, Giombini S, et al. Spinal Meningiomas: review of 174 operated cases. Neurosurg 1989;125:153-60
  11. McCormick PC, Post KD, Stein BM. Intradural extramedullary tumors in adults. Neurosurg Clin N Am 1990;1:591-608
  12. Saraceni C, Harrop JS. Spinal meningioma: chronicles of contemporary neurosurgical diagnosis and management. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2009;111:221-6
  13. Schroth G, Thron A, Guhl L, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of spinal meningiomas and neurinomas. Improvement of imaging by paramagnetic contrast enhancement. J Neurosurg 1987;66:695-700
  14. Ono K, Shimizu T, Fujibayashi S, et al. Predictive value of heterogeneously enhanced magnetic resonance imaging findings with computed tomography evidence of calcification for severe motor deficits in spinal meningioma. Neurospine 2020
  15. Ciapetta P, Domenicuci M, Raco A. Spinal meningiomas: prognosis and recovery factors in 22 cases with severe motor deficits. Acta Neurol Scand 1988;77:27-30
  16. Pansini A, LoRe F, Conti P, et al. Spinal Meningiomas. Springer, Berlin, 1996;1-242
  17. Pereira BJA, Almeida AN, Paiva WS, et al. Neurooncological features of spinal meningiomas: systematic review. Neurochirurgie