Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2022 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 3

Knotted all-suture anchors and knotted titanium suture anchors are not clinically superior to each other in isolated type II slap tear repair: A minimum 2-year follow-up

Pages
300–304
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Overall, 61.4% of the patients were male and the mean age was 34.95 ± 10.67 years.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: This study aimed to compare the mid-term clinical outcomes of using knotted titanium suture anchors (TSA) and knotted all-suture anchors (ASA) in the surgical repair of type II superior labral anterior to posterior (SLAP) lesions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, data of patients who underwent isolated SLAP repair in a single center between 2014 and 2019 were examined.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Overall, 61.4% of the patients were male and the mean age was 34.95 ± 10.67 years.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to compare the mid-term clinical outcomes of using knotted titanium suture anchors (TSA) and knotted all-suture anchors (ASA) in the surgical repair of type II superior labral anterior to posterior (SLAP) lesions. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, data of patients who underwent isolated SLAP repair in a single center between 2014 and 2019 were examined. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgery (ASES) score, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder score, and visual analog scale (VAS) were used for functional assessment preoperatively and at the final follow-up. Results: SLAP repair was performed with ASA in 24 of 44 patients, while 20 received treatment with TSA. Overall, 61.4% of the patients were male and the mean age was 34.95 ± 10.67 years. No significant difference was found between the groups in terms of gender, age, affected side, sports activity, and follow-up time (p = 0.865, p = 0.865, p = 1.0, p = 0.967, and p = 0.846, respectively). ASES, UCLA, and VAS scores at the last follow-up were significantly better than the preoperative scores in both groups (p 0.05). Re-rupture was detected in one patient in each group, and tenotomy was performed as revision surgery. Conclusions: The mid-term clinical results of using knotted TSAs or knotted ASAs in arthroscopic surgery for isolated type II SLAP lesions were comparable. No significant difference was found between the groups in terms of functionality, satisfaction, and pain.

🔖

Cite This Article

CENGİZ, B. (2022). Knotted all-suture anchors and knotted titanium suture anchors are not clinically superior to each other in isolated type II slap tear repair: A minimum 2-year follow-up. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 3, 300–304. https://ajindex.com/articles/445656

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Kibler WB, Sciascia A. Current practice for the surgical treatment of SLAP lesions: A systematic review. Arthroscopy 2016;32(4):669-83
  2. Sullivan S, Hutchinson ID, Curry EJ, et al. Surgical management of type II superior labrum anterior posterior (SLAP) lesions: a review of outcomes and prognostic indicators. Phys sportsmed 2019;47(4):375-86
  3. Snyder SJ, Karzel RP, Del Pizzo W, et al. SLAP lesions of the shoulder. Arthroscopy 1990;6(4):274-9
  4. Kibler WB, Sciascia A. Current practice for the diagnosis of a SLAP lesion: systematic review and physician survey. Arthroscopy 2015;31(12):2456-69
  5. Schrøder CP, Skare Ø, Reikerås O, et al. Sham surgery versus labral repair or biceps tenodesis for type II SLAP lesions of the shoulder: a three-armed randomised clinical trial. Br J Sports Med 2017;51(24):1759-66
  6. Knapik DM, Kolaczko JG, Gillespie RJ, et al. Complications and Return to Activity After Arthroscopic Repair of Isolated Type II SLAP Lesions: A Systematic Review Comparing Knotted Versus Knotless Suture Anchors. Orthop J Sports Med 2020;8(4):2325967120911361
  7. Nolte P-C, Midtgaard KS, Ciccotti M, et al. Biomechanical comparison of Knotless all-suture anchors and knotted all-suture anchors in type II SLAP lesions: a cadaveric study. Arthroscopy 2020;36(8):2094-102
  8. Uluyardımcı E, Öçgüder DA, Bozkurt I, et al. All-suture anchors versus metal suture anchors in the arthroscopic treatment of traumatic anterior shoulder instability: A comparison of midterm outcomes. Jt Dis Relat Surg 2021;32(1):101-7
  9. Sevimli R, Aslantürk O, Ergen E, et al. Mid-Term Outcomes of Arthroscopic Treatment in Patients with a Stiff Elbow. Cureus. 2018 May 15;10(5):e2630
  10. Otto A, Mehl J, Obopilwe E, et al. Biomechanical comparison of onlay distal biceps tendon repair: all-suture anchors versus titanium suture anchors. Am J Sports Med 2019;47(10):2478- 83
  11. Otto A, Dicosmo AM, Baldino JB, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of proximal hamstring repair: all-suture anchor versus titanium suture anchor. Orthop J Sports Med 2019;8(1):2325967119892925
  12. Midtgaard KS, Nolte P-C, Miles JW, et al. Pullout Strength of All-Suture and Metallic Anchors in Repair of Lateral Collateral Ligament Injuries of the Elbow. Arthroscopy 2021 37(9):2800-06 13. Wylie JD, Beckmann JT, Granger E, et al. Functional outcomes assessment in shoulder surgery. World J Orthop 2014;5(5):623- 33
  13. Park HB, Keyurapan E, Gill HS,et al. Suture Anchors and Tacks for Shoulder Surgery, Part II: The