Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2022 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 3

Is there any role of reduction mammoplasty in decreasing breast cancer risk in gigantomastia?

Pages
249–254
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This is also supported by our findings.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Large breasts create psychological and physical problems in women, all of whom must also keep in mind the common problem of breast cancer.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Our retrospective study is based on the records (between June 1, 2014, and June 30, 2019) of patients who underwent breast reduction surgery in the Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetical Surgery clinic of a training and research hospital.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This is also supported by our findings.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: Large breasts create psychological and physical problems in women, all of whom must also keep in mind the common problem of breast cancer. In the present study we examine the effect of breast reduction surgery on breast cancer risk. Materials and Methods: Our retrospective study is based on the records (between June 1, 2014, and June 30, 2019) of patients who underwent breast reduction surgery in the Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetical Surgery clinic of a training and research hospital. Statistical analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics (Version 25.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.). Normal distribution of the data was analyzed with Kolmogorov-Smirnov. The data assessment included descriptive statistical methods and Kruskal-Wallis test. The results were evaluated at a 95% confidence interval and a significance level of p < 0.05. Results: Of the 134 patients included in the study, 47% were aged 36–50 years and 60.4% had a body mass index of 40. The shortest follow-up was 4 years, the longest follow-up was 9 years and the mean follow-up was 5.5 years. The mean amount of tissue removed from the right breast was 1050.54±484.90, the mean amount of tissue removed from the left breast was 1059.54±522.28, and the mean length of hospital stay was 1.15±0.74 days. The pedicle of choice was superomedial in 55.2% and the inverted-T scar technique was used in 66.4%. Definitive findings of neither in-situ nor invasive cancer were identified in any of the cases. Conclusion: Despite major sequelae such as external permanent scarring and decrease in breastfeeding and nipple sensation, breast reduction surgery is the operation that records the highest patient satisfaction in plastic, reconstructive and aesthetica surgery, as it provides physical and psychological relief by eliminating the heavy weight that affects the shoulders, back and neck. It is also known that the risk of breast cancer is decreased due to the removal of a considerable amount of breast tissue with cancer potential from the body, as well as the early diagnosis and treatment of incidentally detected cancer cases, albeit at a low rate. This is also supported by our findings.

🔖

Cite This Article

TUTAK, F. N., DOĞAN, F. (2022). Is there any role of reduction mammoplasty in decreasing breast cancer risk in gigantomastia?. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 3, 249–254. https://ajindex.com/articles/445650

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Ngaage LM, Bai J, Gebran S, Elegbede A, Ihenatu C, Nam AJ et al. A 12-year review of patient-reported outcomes after reduction mammoplasty in patients with high body mass index. Medicine, 2019; 98(25)
  2. Kerrigan CL, Collins ED, Striplin D, et al. The health burden of breast hypertrophy. PlastReconstr Surg, 2001;108:1591-9
  3. Chadbourne EB, Zhang S, Gordon MJ, et al. Clinical outcomes in reduction mammaplasty: a systematic review and metaanalysis of published studies. Mayo Clin Proc, 2001; 76:503–10
  4. Boschert MT, Barone CM, Puckett CL. Outcome analysis of reduction mammaplasty. PlastReconstr Surg, 1996; 98:451–4
  5. Raispis T, Zehring RD, Downey DL. Long term functional results after reduction mammoplasty. Ann Plast Surg, 1995; 34:113–6
  6. Ngaage LM, Ngaage KC, Ngaage DL. The challenges of the postoperative care of obese patients. AnalgResusc: Curr Res, 2015; 4:2
  7. Wirthmann AE, Welsch L, Wellenbrock SV, et al. Reduction mammoplasty in adolescents and elderly: a ten year case series analyzing age related outcome with focus on safety and complications. J PlastReconstrAesthet Surg, 2018; 71:377–83
  8. Rowland JH, Desmond KA, Meyerowitz BE, Belin TR, Wyatt GE, Ganz PA. Role of breast reconstructive surgery in physical and emotional outcomes among breast cancer survivors. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2000;92:1422–9
  9. Dean C, Chetty U, Forrest AP. Effects of immediate breast reconstruction on psychosocial morbidity after mastectomy. Lancet, 1983;1:459–62
  10. Veiga DF, Sabino Neto M, Ferreira LM, et al. Quality-of-life outcomes after pedicled TRAM flap delayed breast reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg, 2004;57:252–7
  11. Stein MJ, Karir A, Arnaout A, Roberts A, Cordeiro E, Zhang T, Zhang J. Quality-of-life and surgical outcomes for breast cancer patients treated with therapeutic reduction mammoplasty versus mastectomy with immediate reconstruction. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2020; 27: 4502-4512
  12. Ferna´ndez-Delgado J, Lo´pez-Pedraza MJ, Blasco JA, et al. Satisfaction with and psychological impact of immediate and deferred breast reconstruction. Ann Oncol, 2008;19:1430-4
  13. Wilkins EG, Cederna PS, Lowery JC, et al. Prospective analysis of psychosocial outcomes in breast reconstruction: one-year postoperative results from the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study. PlastReconstr Surg, 2000;106:1014-25; discussion 1026–1017
  14. Corsten LA, Suduikis SV, Donegan WL. Patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction. Wis Med J, 1992;91:125–26, 129