Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2022 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 1

Early functional outcomes of laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy in obstructed defecation syndrome: Case series

Pages
11–16
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: LVMR is a safe procedure if performed with a selective approach after a thorough preoperative evaluation in ODS patients and a remarkable level of functional recovery can be achieved in these patients, particularly in the postoperative early period.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy (LVMR) has gained popularity in the treatment of obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS)- related morphological disorders of the pelvic floor.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Data of patients who underwent LVMR between May 2019 and December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: LVMR is a safe procedure if performed with a selective approach after a thorough preoperative evaluation in ODS patients and a remarkable level of functional recovery can be achieved in these patients, particularly in the postoperative early period.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy (LVMR) has gained popularity in the treatment of obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS)- related morphological disorders of the pelvic floor. The aim of this study is to investigate the effectiveness, safety and early functional results of the LVMR, especially in ODS-related disorders. Materials and Methods: Data of patients who underwent LVMR between May 2019 and December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic characteristics, comorbid diseases, presence of previous abdominal surgery, proctological examination findings, dynamic magnetic resonance defecography results, anal manometer results, early and late complications, postoperative length of hospital stay of patients were recorded. Wexner Incontinence Score (WIS) and Wexner Constipation Score (WCS) were used in the preoperative and postoperative third month to evaluate the functional recoveries of patients. Results: Of 14 patients, one was man (7.1%) and 13 were women (92.9%). The mean age of the patients was 43.71 ± 11.72 years (range 24-61). Mean length of follow-up was 11.14 ± 4.52 months (range 4-19). Three (21.43%) of the patients had external rectal prolapse and 11 (78.57%) had ODS-related rectocele. In these 11 patients with ODS, the mean preoperative and postoperative WCS were 15.81 ± 3.68 (range 11-24) and 7.45 ± 3.24 (range 4-14), respectively, indicating a statistically significant difference (p< 0.001). Conclusion: LVMR is a safe procedure if performed with a selective approach after a thorough preoperative evaluation in ODS patients and a remarkable level of functional recovery can be achieved in these patients, particularly in the postoperative early period.

🔖

Cite This Article

KOZAN, R. (2022). Early functional outcomes of laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy in obstructed defecation syndrome: Case series. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 1, 11–16. https://ajindex.com/articles/445629

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Sákra L, Šiller J. Obstructed defecation syndrome - review article. Rozhl Chir 2017;96:247-51
  2. Podzemny V, Pescatori LC, Pescatori M. Management of obstructed defecation. World J Gastroenterol 2015;21:1053-60
  3. D'Hoore A, Cadoni R, Penninckx F. Long-term outcome of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for total rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 2004;91:1500-5
  4. Gultekin FA. Short term outcome of laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy for rectal and complex pelvic organ prolapse: case series. Turk J Surg 2019;35:91- 7
  5. Portier G, Kirzin S, Cabarrot P, et al. The effect of abdominal ventral rectopexy on faecal incontinence and constipation in patients with internal intra-anal rectal intussusception. Colorectal Dis 2011;13:914-7
  6. Rickert A, Kienle P. Laparoscopic surgery for rectal prolapse and pelvic floor disorders. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2015;7:1045-54
  7. Riss S, Winstanley J, Collie M. Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy for obstructive defecation syndrome: still the way to go? Int Urogynecol J 2017;28:979-81
  8. Mandovra P, Kalikar V, Patankar RV. Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy for obstructive defecation syndrome: Follow-up in the Indian population. J Minim Access Surg 2021;17:305-10
  9. Lundby L, Laurberg S. Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy for obstructed defaecation syndrome: time for a critical appraisal. Colorectal Dis 2015;17:102-3
  10. Jorge JM, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1993;36:77-97
  11. Agachan F, Chen T, Pfeifer J, Reissman P, Wexner SD. A constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipated patients. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:681-5
  12. D’Hoore A, Penninckx F. Laparoscopic ventral recto(colpo)pexy for rectal prolapse: surgical technique and outcome for 109 patients. Surg Endosc 2006;20:1919-23
  13. Consten EC, van Iersel JJ, Verheijen PM, et al. Longterm outcome after laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy: an observational study of 919 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 2015;262:742-7
  14. Evans C, Stevenson AR, Sileri P, et al. A multicenter collaboration to assess the safety of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy. Dis Colon Rectum 2015;58:799- 807
  15. Tranchart H, Valverde A, Goasguen N, et al. Conservative treatment of intrarectal mesh migration after ventral laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Int J Colorectal Dis 2013;28:1563-6
  16. Abed H, Rahn DD, Lowenstein L, et al. Systematic Review Group of the Society of Gynecologic Surgeons. Incidence and mana