Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2022 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 3

Nomogram of corpus callosum length and thickness in Turkish population

Pages
240–243
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Objective measurements of CC may help to identify developmental anomalies of CNS and enable better prenatal counseling.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: Central nervous system (CNS) malformations constitute an important part of congenital anomalies and corpus callosum anomalies are highly associated with other CNS abnormalities.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Starting from this point of view we conducted a retrospective study providing reliable reference charts for accurate fetal corpus callosum measurements.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Objective measurements of CC may help to identify developmental anomalies of CNS and enable better prenatal counseling.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: Central nervous system (CNS) malformations constitute an important part of congenital anomalies and corpus callosum anomalies are highly associated with other CNS abnormalities. Starting from this point of view we conducted a retrospective study providing reliable reference charts for accurate fetal corpus callosum measurements. Materials and Methods: The corpus callosum length (CCL) and thickness (CCT) were measured in the midsagittal plane. The CCL was measured from the most anterior part of the genu to the most posterior part of the splenium (outer-outer), the thickness of the body was measured as well. Results: Study included 1152 patients. 95.6% of the detailed ultrasonographies were performed between 19-21 gestational weeks and 611(63.0%) were performed at 20th gestational week. The mean values of the CCL and CCT measurements were from 16.9 mm to 25.5 mm and from 1.3 mm to 2.0 mm, respectively with increasing gestational weeks. Third percentile for CCL was 14.6 mm, 16.2 mm and 17.9 mm for 19th, 20th and 21th gestational weeks, respectively and median CCL values were 17.7mm, 19.5 mm and 21.7 mm for 19th, 20th and 21th gestational weeks respectively. Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that defining and using corpus callosum length and thickness charts characteristic for our population may improve diagnostic accuracy of corpus callosum presence and structure. Objective measurements of CC may help to identify developmental anomalies of CNS and enable better prenatal counseling.

🔖

Cite This Article

GUNAKAN, E., AZAMİ, A., TOHMAA, Y. A., ESİNA, S. (2022). Nomogram of corpus callosum length and thickness in Turkish population. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 3, 240–243. https://ajindex.com/articles/445605

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Sotiriadis A, Hernandez-Andrade E, da Silva Costa F, Ghi T, Glanc P, Khalil A, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: role of ultrasound in screening for and follow-up of pre-eclampsia. Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology: the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2019;53(1):7-22
  2. Jeret JS, Serur D, Wisniewski K, Fisch C. Frequency of agenesis of the corpus callosum in the developmentally disabled population as determined by computerized tomography. Pediatr Neurosci. 1985;12(2):101-3
  3. Mangione R, Fries N, Godard P, Capron C, Mirlesse V, Lacombe D, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcome following prenatal diagnosis of an isolated anomaly of the corpus callosum. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;37(3):290-5
  4. Manganaro L, Bernardo S, De Vito C, Antonelli A, Marchionni E, Vinci V, et al. Role of fetal MRI in the evaluation of isolated and non-isolated corpus callosum dysgenesis: results of a crosssectional study. Prenat Diagn. 2017;37(3):244-52
  5. Jarre A, Llorens Salvador R, Montoliu Fornas G, Montoya Filardi A. Value of brain MRI when sonography raises suspicion of agenesis of the corpus callosum in fetuses. Radiologia. 2017;59(3):226-31
  6. Volpe P, Paladini D, Resta M, Stanziano A, Salvatore M, Quarantelli M, et al. Characteristics, associations and outcome of partial agenesis of the corpus callosum in the fetus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006;27(5):509-16
  7. Margariti PN, Blekas K, Katzioti FG, Zikou AK, Tzoufi M, Argyropoulou MI. Magnetization transfer ratio and volumetric analysis of the brain in macrocephalic patients with neurofibromatosis type 1. Eur Radiol. 2007;17(2):433-8
  8. Wegiel J, Kuchna I, Nowicki K, Imaki H, Wegiel J, Marchi E, et al. The neuropathology of autism: defects of neurogenesis and neuronal migration, and dysplastic changes. Acta Neuropathol. 2010;119(6):755-70
  9. Achiron R, Achiron A. Development of the human fetal corpus callosum: a high-resolution, cross-sectional sonographic study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001;18(4):343-7
  10. Pilu G, Sandri F, Perolo A, Pittalis MC, Grisolia G, Cocchi G, et al. Sonography of fetal agenesis of the corpus callosum: a survey of 35 cases. Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology: the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1993;3(5):318-29
  11. Malinger G, Zakut H. The corpus callosum: normal fetal development as shown by transvaginal sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993;161(5):1041-3. 1