Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2022 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 5

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty: Short to mid-term clinical and radiological results

Pages
478–482
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Also, with appropriate rehabilitation protocol, significant improvement in pain and function can be achieved.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: This paper aimed to review the early and midterm radiological and clinical findings of our patients who were treated surgically with reverse shoulder prosthesis via to rotator cuff arthropathy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: A total of 22 patients (female: 14, male 8), with shoulder arthrosis due to cuff tears were treated with reverse shoulder prosthesis between 2015 and 2018 in our clinic.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Also, with appropriate rehabilitation protocol, significant improvement in pain and function can be achieved.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: This paper aimed to review the early and midterm radiological and clinical findings of our patients who were treated surgically with reverse shoulder prosthesis via to rotator cuff arthropathy. Materials and Methods: A total of 22 patients (female: 14, male 8), with shoulder arthrosis due to cuff tears were treated with reverse shoulder prosthesis between 2015 and 2018 in our clinic. The mean age of the patients was detected as 69.4 years (65-93 years). The mean clinical follow-up was detected as 11 months (3-36 month). The patients were evaluated with Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Shoulder Constant Score, American Shoulder/Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score (ASES) scores, preoperatively. In last outpatient visits, patients were evaluated with radiological views and range of motion, Shoulder Constant, VAS and ASES scores. Results: The mean shoulder flexion, extension, and abduction was measured as 101°, 24°, and 97.9° respectively in the last polyclinic controls. The mean shoulder Constant scores were 30.8 preoperatively and 62.1 at follow-up (p=0.001). Preoperatively, the mean score of ASES was 31.6. And it was increased to 65.9 with the last follow-up (p = 0.001). The mean preoperative VAS scores were 7.42, and the mean postoperative mean were 2.8 (p = 0.001). Periprosthetic fracture developed intraoperatively in one patient who also had a dislocation occurred in the 2nd month postoperatively. In another patient, superficial infection occurred at the postoperative 3rd week. One patient died because of cardiac problems postoperatively and another one had a traumatic periprosthetic fracture at 5th month postoperatively. Conclusion: While clinical presentation of patient is an advanced rotator cuff tear arthropathy, the application of reverse shoulder prosthesis is major surgical procedure. Also, with appropriate rehabilitation protocol, significant improvement in pain and function can be achieved.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERGEN, E., ŞAKÇI, M. Ş., ÖZDEŞ, H. U., TÜRKMEN, E., ERTEM, K., CANBAY, A. (2022). Reverse shoulder arthroplasty: Short to mid-term clinical and radiological results. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 5, 478–482. https://ajindex.com/articles/445576

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Clement ND, Nie YX, McBirnie JM. Management of degenerative rotator cuff tears: a review and treatment strategy. Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol. 2012; 4(1): 48
  2. Werner CM, Steinmann PA, Gilbart M, at al. Treatment of painful pseudoparesis due to irreparable rotator cuff dysfunction with the Delta III reverse-ball-and socket total shoulder prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87:1476-86
  3. Ecklund KJ, Lee TQ, Tibone J, Gupta R. Rotator cuff tear arthropaty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2007; 15: 340-349 4. França FO, Freitas JMA, Godinho PC, at al. Clinical and functional evaluation of patients submitted to reverse arthroplasty with minimum one year of follow-up. Rev Bras Ortop. 2018; 53(6): 714-720
  4. Eajazi A, Kussman S, LeBedis C, et al. Rotator Cuff Tear Arthropathy: Pathophysiology, Imaging Characteristics, and Treatment Options. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015; 205(5): W502- W511
  5. Sevimli R, Karakaplan M, Korkmaz MF, Gormeli G. Resection Arthroplasty in Shoulder Joint Tuberculosis: A Case Presentation. Gavin J Case Rep 2016; 1: 7-9
  6. Leung B, Horodyski M, Struk AM, at al. Functional outcome of hemiarthroplasty compared with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of rotator cuff tear arthropathy. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2012; 21:319-23
  7. Hecker A, Aguirre J, Eichenberger U, et al. Deltoid muscle contribution to shoulder flexion and abduction strength: an experimental approach. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021; 30(2): e60-e68
  8. Matsen FA 3rd, Boileau P, Walch G, at al. The reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89:660-7
  9. Brolin TJ, Updegrove GF, Horneff JG. Classifications in Brief: Hamada Classification of Massive Rotator Cuff Tears. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017; 475(11): 2819-2823
  10. Boileau P, Watkinson D, Hatzidakis AM, at al: The Grammont reverse shoulder prosthesis: results in cuff tear arthritis, fracture sequelae, and revision arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2006; 15:527-40
  11. Boileau P, Gonzalez JF, Chuinard C, at al. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty after failed rotator cuff surgery. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2009; 18(4):600-6
  12. Sirveaux F, Favard L, Oudet D, at al. Grammont inverted total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis with massive rupture of the cuff. Results of a multicentre study of 80 shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004; 86(3): 388-95 14. Walch G, Bacle G, Lädermann A, at al. Do the indications, results, and complications o