SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi / 2003 / Cilt: 58 - Sayı: 4

Yeni Zelanda Kamu Yönetimi Reformu: Toplumsal Dönüşüm

Public Sector Reform in New Zealand: Transformation of the Society

Naim KAPUCU
Pages
123–143
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Lessons learned from New Zealand reforms in other countries are briefly described.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Reform of public administration is now a worldwide phenomenon, as governments grapple with rapid social, economic and technological change, including the effects of globalization.
📊
Key Findings & Data:New Zealand has implemented radical and comprehensive public sector reforms since the mid-1980s.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Lessons learned from New Zealand reforms in other countries are briefly described.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Reform of public administration is now a worldwide phenomenon, as governments grapple with rapid social, economic and technological change, including the effects of globalization. New Zealand has implemented radical and comprehensive public sector reforms since the mid-1980s. These refonns have established objectives and set incentives for productive peıformance and involve greater transparency. The opening of government agencies to competition, greater privatization and accountability standards contributed to improved government performance. These reforms have reduced the New Zealand Goyernment's market involvement relative to the total economy. Other countries have taken similar measures, but New Zealand's public-sector reforms have been more radical and comprehensive. This article examines comprehensive and fundamental administrative reform adopted in New Zealand. The role of politics and political leadership is linked to the various mbdels of reform. Lessons learned from New Zealand reforms in other countries are briefly described.

Özet

Önceleri sadece özel sektörle ilgili olduğu düşünülen rekabet kavramı, artık günümüzde kamu yönetimi ile ilişkili olarak da kullanılmaya başlanmıştır. Rekabet özel sektörde, etkinliğin, verimliliğin, kalitenin, çabukluğun bir teminatı ya da tetikleyicisi olarak algılanmaktadır. Bir yanda uygulamada rekabetin bu yöndeki olumlu etkileri, diğer yandan da kamu sektöründeki verimsizliğin, etkinsizliğin, hantallığın, aşın bürokrasinin sebebi olarak görülen tekel niteliğine karşı duyulan tepki, rekabetin kamu yönetiminde de gündeme gelmesine neden olmuştur. Bu çalışmada, kamu yönetiminde rekabetin olabilirliği, işlevleri, rekabet biçimleri ve mekanizmaları, ortaya çıkabilecek muhtemel sorunlar tartışılmıştır. Çalışmada özellikle kamu sektöründe rekabet yerine geçebilecek yöntemler üzerinde durularak, kamu yönetimini modernleştirme çabalarına, yeni kamu yönetimi anlayışı (NPM) çerçevesinde ışık tutulmaya çalışılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAPUCU, N. (2022). Yeni Zelanda Kamu Yönetimi Reformu: Toplumsal Dönüşüm. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, Cilt: 58 - Sayı: 4, 123–143. https://ajindex.com/articles/443317

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. AUCOIN, P. (1990), "Administrative Reform in Public Management: Paradigms, Principles, Paradoxes and Pendulums," Governance, 3 II: 115-137.
  2. BOSTON, J. (1996), "Origins and Destinations: New Zealand's Model of Public Management and the International Transfer of Ideas," WELLER, P. / DAVIS, G. (eds.), New Ideas Betler Government (St. Leonards, Australia: Ailen &Unwin). BOSTON, J. (1993), "Financial Management Reform: Principles and Practice in New Zealand," Public Policy and Administration (Summer). BOSTON, J. (1994), "Purchasing Policy Advice: The Limits of Contracting Out," Governance (January). BOSTON, J. (1992), "The Problems of Policy Coordination: The New Zealand Experience," Governance (January). BOSTON, J. (1992), "Assessing the Performance of Departmental Chief Executives: Perspectives from New Zealand," Public Administration (Autumn). BOSTON, J. (1987), "Transforming New Zealand's Public Sector," Public Administration (winter). BOSTON, J./PALLOT, P. (1997), "linking Strategy and Performance Developments in the New Zealand Public Sector," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, Vol. 3. BOSTON J./MARTIN, J./PALLOT, J./VVALSH, P. (eds.) (1991), Reshapins the State (New Zealand's Bureaucratic Revolution). BOSTON, J./MARTIN, J./PALLOT, J./VVALSH, P. (1996), Public Management: The New Zealand Model (Auckland, New Zealand: Oxford University Press). DOUGLAS, R. (1990), "The Politics of Successful Structural Reform," Policy, Vol. 2: 2-6.
  3. GAWTHROP, L. C. (1984), Public Sector Management: Systems and Ethics (Bloomington: University of Indiana Press). HALLIGAN, J. (1995), "Policy Advice and the Public Service," PETERS, B. Gay / SAVOIE, Donald J. (eds.), Governance in a Changing Environment (Montreal, Canada: McGill-Queens University Press):138-172.
  4. HOLMES, M. (1992), "Public Sector Management Reform:Convergence or Divergence?," Governance (October). HOOD. C. (1991), "Public Management for Ali Seasons," Public Administration, Vol. 69/3. HOOD, c. (1990), "De- Sir Humphreyfying the VVestminster Model of Bureaucracy: A New Style of Governance?," Governance, Vol.68/ 3: 205-14.
  5. HORN, M. J. (1995), The Political Economy of Public Administration: Institutional Change in the Public Sector (New York: Cambridge University Press). INGRAHAM, P. (1997), "Play it again, Sam; it's stili not right: Searching for the right notes in administrative reform," Public Administration Review, Volume 57/4 (July-August 1997):325. IGRAHAM, P./THOMPSON, J./SANDERS, R. (1998), Transformin