Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi / 2003 / Cilt: 58 - Sayı: 1

Kamusal Kaynak Planlaması Yazılımı Seçiminde Bilgiye Dayalı Karar Destek Aracı Geliştirilmesi

Developing Knowledge Based Decision Support Tool for Enterprise Resources Planning (ERP) Software Selection

Pages
71–96
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The methodology is applied to an electronic component manufacturer's ERP selection process and the results are presented.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purchasing a large software system like Enterprise Resources Planning (ERP) is a project with significant financial impact and involves making a decision based on both qualitative and quantitative information.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The methodology involves three elements: (1) data acquisition and assessment, (2) calculation of total user preferences, and (2) multiobjective optimization.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The methodology is applied to an electronic component manufacturer's ERP selection process and the results are presented.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purchasing a large software system like Enterprise Resources Planning (ERP) is a project with significant financial impact and involves making a decision based on both qualitative and quantitative information. In these types of situations, analytical tools are invaluable; however, combining fundamentally different data into a single model is quite a challenge. This paper proposes a methodology to select the best ERP product when it is desirable to consider multiple objectives with both qualitative and quantitative factors. The methodology involves three elements: (1) data acquisition and assessment, (2) calculation of total user preferences, and (2) multiobjective optimization. The first two elements translate qualitative information into quantitative parameters that are then input to the final element, multiobjective optimization. The methodology is applied to an electronic component manufacturer's ERP selection process and the results are presented.

Özet

Kurumsal kaynak planlaması (ERP) gibi kapsamlı bir yazılım sistemini satın almak, yoğun bir fınansal etkiye sahip olan ve buna ek olarak sayısal ve sayısal olmayan bilgiye dayalı bir projedir. Bu tip durumlarda, analitik araçları kullanmak büyük bir yarar sağlar. Bununla birlikte, temel olarak farklı olan bilgileri bir modelde bir araya getirmek büyük bir zorluk meydana getirir. Bu makale, sayısal ve sayısal olmayan faktörler ve birden fazla amacı göz önüne almak arzu edilen bir durum olduğunda en iyi ERP paketini seçebilecek bir metod öneriyor. Bu metod, üç bölümden oluşmaktadır: (1) Bilgi toplanması ve ölçümlemesi, (2) toplam kullanıcı tercihlerinin hesaplanması, ve (3) birden fazla amaçlı optimizasyon. İlk iki bölüm, sonradan birden fazla amaçlı optımizasyon modeline girdi olacak sayısal olmayan bilgileri sayısal parametrelere dönüştürüyor. Metod, A.B.D'deki bir elektronik parça üreticisinin ERP seçim sürecine uygulanıyor ve sonuçlar sunuluyor.

🔖

Cite This Article

BARUT, M., EROL, İ. (2022). Kamusal Kaynak Planlaması Yazılımı Seçiminde Bilgiye Dayalı Karar Destek Aracı Geliştirilmesi. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, Cilt: 58 - Sayı: 1, 71–96. https://ajindex.com/articles/443310

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. ANTHONY, T.F. and F.P. BUFFA, (1977), "Strategic purchase scheduling", Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, spring, 27-31.
  2. AKAO, Y., (1990), Quality Function Deployment: Integrating customer requirements into Product Design, Productivity Press,
  3. Cambridge, Massachusetts BERNROIDER, E., and KORCH, S., (2001) "ERP selection process in midsize and large organizations", Business Process Management Journal, vol: 7, no: 3 p: 251-257
  4. BUFFA, F.P., (1983), "Strategic purchase scheduling" Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, Fall, 31-40.
  5. CHEN, S. J., and HWANG, C. L., (1992), Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Method and Applications, Springer-Verlag, New York FIORE, J, (1999),
  6. APICS Performance Advantage, September, p:12-15
  7. GHODSYPOUR, S.H. and C.O. O'BRIEN, (1998), "a decision support system for supplier selection using an integrated AHP and LP", International Journal of Production Economics, 56-57, 199-212.
  8. HANDFIELD, R., WALTON, S.V., SROUFE, R., and MELNYK, S.A, (2002), "Applying environmental criteria to supplier assessment: A study in the application of the Analytical Hierarchy Process", European Journal of Operational Research 141, 70-87.
  9. JUANG, C. H., HUANG, X. H., ELTON, D.J, (1991), "Fuzzy Information Processing by Mote Carlo Simulation technique" Journal of Civil Engineering Systems, vol: 8, no:1 p: 19-25
  10. KASILINGAM, R.G. and C.H. LEE, (1996), "Selection of vendors-A mixed-integer programming approach", Computer and Industrial Engineering 31, p: 347-350.
  11. KHOO, L.P and HO, N.C., (1996), "Framework of a Fuzzy Quality Function Deployment System", International Journal of Production Research, 34, 299-311
  12. KIM, K., MOSKOWITZ, H., DHINGRA, A., EVANS, G., (2000), "Fuzzy Multi-Criteria models for quality function deployment", European Journal of Operational Research, 121 504-518 KORPELA J. and A. LEHMUSVAARA, (1999), "A customer oriented approach to warehouse network evaluation and design", International Journal of Production Economics 59, 135-146.
  13. LAI, V.S., WONG, B.K., and CHEUNG, W., (2002) "Group Decision Making in a Multiple Criteria environment: A case using the AHP in software selection", European Journal of Operational Research 137, 134-144
  14. LU, M., MADU, C.N., C., WINOKUR, D., (1994), "Integrating QFD, AHP and Benchmarking in strategic marketing", Journal of Business Industrial Marketing 9 (1), 41-50
  15. MASUD, M. Abu, (1993), "Using Fuzzy Sets in Quality Function Deployment", 2nd Industrial Engineering Research Conference Proceedi