Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi / 2005 / Cilt: 60 - Sayı: 3

"Yeni" Avrasya Joepolitiğinin Bir Parçası Olarak Dağlık Karabağ Sorunu

The Magorno Karabakh Conflict as a Part of the "New" Eurasian Geopolitics

Pages
1–32
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The article has included facts and figures until 2004.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The artiele investigates the Armenian-Azerbaijani Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The conflict has existed since 1988 and remains unresolved in spite of international efforts. it became the first major international conflict that the OSCE has dealt with.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The article has included facts and figures until 2004.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2004 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The artiele investigates the Armenian-Azerbaijani Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. The conflict has existed since 1988 and remains unresolved in spite of international efforts. it became the first major international conflict that the OSCE has dealt with. The conflict is certainly an important part of the geopolitics of the Eurasian region. The article first focuses on the background of the conflict, gi ving a clear pieture of the causes and consequences and proceeds to review the interests of the regional and world powers conceming the issue. The legal aspects are described as well. The central question is whether a solution to the conflict depends more on the internal factors or external factors? At this the interests of Russia is analysed in detai1. Tnrkey and EU are described as the only powers that have a direct interest in a settlement of the dispute. Currently, the peace initiative is not in Baku or Yerevan, but more in Moscow and Washington. The article has included facts and figures until 2004.

Özet

Dağlık Karabağ sorunu 15 yıldır çözümsüz olarak kalmaktadır ve uluslararası çabalara rağmen Azerbaycan'ın toprak bütünlügü hala sağlanamamıştır. İleri sürülen çözüm önerilerini ilgili devletler kabul etmemişlerdir. Sorun, bölgede yürütülen jeopolitik oyunlar ve rekabetten kaynaklanmaktadır. Bundan dolayı da Karabağ sorununu yeni "Büyük Oyun"un bir parçası olarak değerlendirrnek pek de yanlış sayılmaz. Karabağ sorunu, 90'lı yıllardan itibaren Rusya, Amerika, İran gibi devletler açısından bölgede nüfuz kurmanın bir aracı haline dönüştürülmüştür. Büyük oyunların geçtigi bu bölgede sınırlarını Errnenistan'a kapalı tutan Türkiye'nin yeri ne olmalıdır? Bu makale, 1988'de çıkan Dağlık Karabağ sorununu çok taraflı olarak incelemektedir. Sorunun tarihi kökeni ele alınmakta ve uluslararası hukuk bakımından değerlendirilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ABUSHEV, K. (2022). "Yeni" Avrasya Joepolitiğinin Bir Parçası Olarak Dağlık Karabağ Sorunu. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, Cilt: 60 - Sayı: 3, 1–32. https://ajindex.com/articles/443272

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. ABASOV, Ali/ HAROUTLUN, Khachatrian (2002), "Variants for a solution of the Karabakh conflict," Central Asia and Caucasus Journal. AKHUNDOV, Fuad (1998), "Democratic Republic of Azerbaijan: Chronology of major events," Azerbaijan InternationaL. ALIYEV, Igrar (1989), "Upper Karabagh - history, facts, events, Baku: Elm Treaty of Kurekchay 1805," www.karabakh.org ALIEVA, Leyla (19.06.2003), "Geopolitics and Nagomo-Karabakh," 525cLcom ASGEROV, i (16.11.1985), "Armenian Congress held in Athens," The Investia. ATKIN, Muriel (1980), Russia and Iran 1780-1828 (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press). BAILES, Alyson (2003), Armament and disarmament in the Caucasus and Central Asia (Stockholm: Stockholm Intemational Peace Research Institute). BARANOVSKY, Vladimir (2000), "Russia, a part of Europe or apart from Europe?," International Affairs, Vol. 76~3. BARSEGHYAN, Kristine/ KARAEV, Zainiddin (2004), "Playing Cat-and-Mouse: Conflict and Third- Party Mediation in Post-Soviet Space," The online journal of peace and conflict resolution, www.ojpcr.org BENNIGSEN, Alexandre/ WIMBUSH, Enders, S. (1985), Muslims of the Soviet Empire-A guide (Bloomington: Indiana University Press). BOURNOUTIAN, George A. (1996), "The ethnic composition and the socio-economic condition of Eastem Armenia in the first half of the nineteenth century," SUNY, Ronald Grigor (ed.), Transcaucasia; Nationalism and Social Change (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press). BURKE, Justin (2001), "Azerbaijan, Russia to sign an agreement of controversial radar facility," www.eurasianet.org CASTELLlNO, Joshua (2000), International lawand Self-determination. The Interplay of the Politics of Territorial Possession with Formulations of Post-Colonial 'National' Identity (Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers). "Concepts and Reality," Journal of Central Asia and Caucasus (Stockholm). CORNELL, Svante E. (1999), The Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict (Uppsala: Department of East European Studies). CROISSANT, Michael/ ARAS, Bulent (1999), Oil and Geopolitics in the Caspian Sea Region (Westport). DEHDASHTI, Rexane (2000), Internationale Organisationen als Vermittler in innenstaatlichen Konfiikten. Die OSZE und der Berg-Karabach Konflikt (Frankfurt/Main: Campus Verlag). DE PAUW, Freddy (1996), "Turkey' s Policies in Transcaucasia," COPPIETERS,Bruno (ed.), Contested Borders in the Caucasus (VUB University Press). DiKBAŞ, Kadir (1997), Orta Asya Türk Cumhuriyetleri: Olaylar Kronolojisi (istanbul: Doğu Türkistan Kültür ve Dayanı