Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi / 2005 / Cilt: 60 - Sayı: 2

The Early Premises of Modern Turkish Citizenship: the Construction of National Citizenship During the National Struggle Period

Modern Türk Vatandaşlığı Kavramının Erken Öncüleri: Milli Mücadele Dönemi'nde Ulusal Vatandaşlığın Kuruluşu

Pages
195–217
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The article mainly argues that it was before the establishment of the republic that the territorial, cultural and political boundaries of the "new community inside" and the modern Turkish citizenship were drawn mainly in and through the foreign policy acts and decisions of the founders of the new state.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study is an analysis of the construction of modern Turkish citizenship with a novel historical account about the politics of inclusion and exclusion that is the politics of citizenship between 1919-1923, which was a period of transition from an imperial rule to a republican regime.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It focuses on the historical dynamics of inclusion and exclusion by using the general foreign policy orientation and practices of the nationalist Ankara government as the analytical tool to follow up the emergence of the early premises of modern citizenship conception.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The article mainly argues that it was before the establishment of the republic that the territorial, cultural and political boundaries of the "new community inside" and the modern Turkish citizenship were drawn mainly in and through the foreign policy acts and decisions of the founders of the new state.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study is an analysis of the construction of modern Turkish citizenship with a novel historical account about the politics of inclusion and exclusion that is the politics of citizenship between 1919-1923, which was a period of transition from an imperial rule to a republican regime. It focuses on the historical dynamics of inclusion and exclusion by using the general foreign policy orientation and practices of the nationalist Ankara government as the analytical tool to follow up the emergence of the early premises of modern citizenship conception. The article mainly argues that it was before the establishment of the republic that the territorial, cultural and political boundaries of the "new community inside" and the modern Turkish citizenship were drawn mainly in and through the foreign policy acts and decisions of the founders of the new state.

Özet

Bu çalışma, Türkiye tarihinde imparatorluk yönetiminden cumhuriye rejimine geçiş dönemi olan 1919-1923 arası dönemde, modern, ulusal vatandaşlık kimliğinin kuruluşunun, yeni bir kapsama/dışlama siyaseti yani vatandaşlık siyaseti anlayışının temel alınarak irdelenmesidir. Çalışma, Türkiye'deki kapsama/dışlama siyasetinin tarihsel dinamikleri üzerine odaklanırken, milliyetçi Ankara Hükümeti'nin genel dış politika yönelimi, karar ve uygulamalarını, modern vatandaşlık kavramının erken öncüllerinin kuruluşunu irdelemede analitik araç olarak kullanmıştır. Bu çerçevede, çalışmanın ana argümanı, Türkiye'de modern vatandaşlığın fiziksel, kültürel ve siyasal sınırlarının, temel olarak yeni devletin kurucularının dış politika karar ve uygulamaları yoluyla çizildiğidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYGUSUZ, Ö. (2022). The Early Premises of Modern Turkish Citizenship: the Construction of National Citizenship During the National Struggle Period. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, Cilt: 60 - Sayı: 2, 195–217. https://ajindex.com/articles/443267

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. AKÇAM, Taner (1994), Türk Ulusal Kimliği ve Ermeni Sorunu (İstanbul: İletişim). ARGUN, Betigül Ercan (1999), "Universal Citizenship Rights and Turkey's Kurdish Question," Journal of Muslim Minority Studies, 19/1: 85-103.
  2. BRUBAKER, William Rogers (1992), Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany (Cambridge: Harvard University Press). CAMPBELL, David (1996), Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press). CİZRE, Ümit (2002), "Turkey's Kurdish Problem: Borders, Identity, and Hegemony," LUSTICK, Ian/ O'LEARY, Brendan/ CALLAGHY, T. (eds.), Right-Sizing the State: The Politics of Moving Borders (Oxford: Oxford University Press): 222-252.
  3. GOLOGLU, Mahmut (1971), Türkiye Cumhuriyeti 1923 (Ankara: Başnur Matbaası). GOLOĞLU, Mahmut (1971), Cumhuriyete Doğru (Ankara: Bateş). HABERMAS, Jürgen (1995), "Citizenship and National Identity: Some Reflections on the Future of Europe," BEINER, R (der.), Theorizing Citizenship (Albany: State University of New York Press): 255-281.
  4. HAMMAR, Tomas (1986), "Citizenship: Membership of a Nation or of a State," International Migration, 24/4:743-744.
  5. HEPER, Metin (1985), The State Tradition in Turkey (Northgate, Walkington: Eothen Press). İÇDUYGU, Ahmet/ ÇOLAK, Yılmaz/SOYARIK, Nalan (1999),"What is the Matter with Citizenship? A Turkish Debate," Middle Eastern Studies, 35/4:187-208.
  6. İÇDUYGU, Ahmet/ KEYMAN, Fuat (1999) "Globalleşme, Anayasallık ve Türkiye'de Vatandaşlık Tartışması," Doğu Batı, 5:143-155.
  7. KİRİŞÇİ, Kemal (2000), "Disaggregating Turkish Citizenship and Immigration Practices," Middle Eastern Studies, 36/3: 1-22.
  8. KÜLTÜR BAKANLIĞI (1994), Atatürk'ün Milli Dış Politikasi: Milli Mücadele Dönemine Ait 100 Belge (Ankara). LECA, Jean (1992), "Questions on Citizenship," MOUFFE, C. (der.), Dimensions of Radical Democracy (London: Verso):21-22.
  9. MERAY, Seha L. (1971), Lozan Bans Konferansı: Tutanaklar, Belgeler (Ankara: Siyasal Bilgiler Yayını). OLDFIELD, Adrian (1998), Citizenship and Community: Civil Republicanism and the Modern World (London: Routledge). ORAN, Baskın (1997), Atatürk Milliyetçiliği (Ankara: Bilgi). PAREKH, Bhikhu (1994), "Discourses on National Identity," Political Studies, XLII: 492-504.
  10. PERİNÇEK, Doğu (der.) (1999),
  11. Mustafa Kemal, Eskisehir-lzmit Konuşmalar I (İstanbul: Kaynak Yayınları). PRIZEL, Uya (1998), National Identity and Foreign Policy: Nationalism and Leadership in Poland, Russia and Ukraine (Cambridge: Cambridge Universit