SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi / 2005 / Cilt: 60 - Sayı: 2

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and Economic Growth: The Probable Impacts of the Climate Change Policy on the Manifacturing Industry in Turkey

Birleşmiş Milletler İklim Değişikliği Çerçeve Sözleşmesi ve Ekonomik Büyüme: İklim Değişikliği Politikasını Türkiye İmalat Sanayii Üzerindeki Olası Etkileri

Özcan BAĞDEMİR
Pages
49–70
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The investments for adopting clean technologies and pollution abatement operating expenditures will bring about additional costs to the Turkish economy

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:As of May 2004, Turkey has taken part in the international cooperation process regarding the global environmental problems by becoming a party to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The industrialized countries agreed at the Conference of the Parties to the Framework Convention on Climate Change in 1997 at Kyoto, to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions in aggregate to about 5% below of the 1990 level, for the budget years 2008-2012.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The investments for adopting clean technologies and pollution abatement operating expenditures will bring about additional costs to the Turkish economy
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2004 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

As of May 2004, Turkey has taken part in the international cooperation process regarding the global environmental problems by becoming a party to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. The industrialized countries agreed at the Conference of the Parties to the Framework Convention on Climate Change in 1997 at Kyoto, to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions in aggregate to about 5% below of the 1990 level, for the budget years 2008-2012. If Turkey would undertake to realize the target of the Kyoto Protocol, she has to take the necessary actions in the production sectors that are the main sources of these greenhouse gas emissions. The investments for adopting clean technologies and pollution abatement operating expenditures will bring about additional costs to the Turkish economy

Özet

Türkiye, Birleşmiş Milletler İklim Değişikliği Çerçeve Sözleşmesi'ne Mayıs 2004 tarihinde taraf olarak küresel çevre sorunları karşısında uluslararası işbirliği içinde yerini almıştır. 1997 yılında Kyoto kentinde toplanan İklim Değişikliği Çerçeve Sözleşmesi Taraflar Konferansı'nda gelişmiş ülkeler, 2008-2012 bütçe yıllarında sera gazı emisyonlarını 1990 yılı düzeylerinin en az yüzde 5 altına azaltma taahhüdünde bulunmuşlardır. Türkiye'nin Kyoto Protokolü hedefini gerçekleştirme taahhüdünde bulunması durumunda emisyonların kaynağı olan üretim alanlarında gerekli önlemlerin alınması gerekecektir. Bu amaçla temiz teknolojilere yapılacak yatırımlar ve arıtma tesislerinin işletimi için yapılacak harcamalar Türkiye ekonomisine ek maliyetler getirecektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAĞDEMİR, Ö. (2022). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and Economic Growth: The Probable Impacts of the Climate Change Policy on the Manifacturing Industry in Turkey. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, Cilt: 60 - Sayı: 2, 49–70. https://ajindex.com/articles/443237

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. AKÇASOY, Kısmet (2003), Çevresel Hesaplan Kapsayan Ulusal Hesaplar Matrisi (NAMEA: National Accounting Matrix Including Environmental Accounts) Çerçevesinin Aydınlatılması; Türkiye'de Hava Emisyonları İçin Örnek Bir Uygulama (Ankara: Devlet İstatistik Enstitüsü Uzmanlık Tezi). BERGMAN, Lars (1995), "Environment-Economy Interactions in a Computable General Equilibrium Model: A Case Study of Sweden," JOHANSSON, P. 0. / KRISTOM, B. / MALER, K. G. (eds.), Current Issues in Environmental Economics (Manchester: Manchester University Press): 153-170.
  2. BRANDT, Willy (1980), North - South: A Programme for Survival (London: Penguin Books Ltd). BURN1AUX, Jean Marc / MARTIN, John P. / NICOLETTI, Giuseppe / MARTINS, Joaquim Oliveira (1992), "The Costs of Reducing CO2 Emissions: Evidence from Gren," OECD Economic Department Working Papers (Paris: No: 115). CARRARO, Carlo / GALEOTTI, Marzio (1997), "Economic Growth, International Competitiveness and Environmental Protection: R&D and Innovation Strategies with the WARM Model," Energy Economics, Vol.: 19: 2-28.
  3. CHRISTIANSEN, G. B. / TIETENBERG, T. H. (1985), "Distributional and Macroeconomic Aspects of Environmental Policy," KNEESE, Allen V. / SWEENEY James L. (eds.), Handbook of Natural Resource and Energy Economics, Volume: 1 (The Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishers): 345-393.
  4. COE, David J.I HELPMAN, Elhanan (1995) "International R&D Spillovers," European Economic Review, Vol.: 39: 859-887.
  5. DEAN, Andrew / HOELLER Peter (1992), "Costs of Reducing CO2 Emissions: Evidence from Six Global Models," OECD Economic Studies (Paris: No. 19): 15-48.
  6. DPT (2000), İklim Değişikliği Özel İhtisas Komisyonu Raporu (Ankara: Sekizinci Beş Yıllık Kalkınma Planı (2001-2005), DPT Yayın No: 2532, ÖİK Yayın No: 548). GÜVEN, Selma (1999), 1970-2010 Yıllan Arasındaki Türkiye Sera Gazı Emisyonlarının İstatistiksel Değerlendirilmesi (Ankara: DİE). HEADY, C. J. / MARKADYA, A. / BLYTH, W. / COLLINGWOOD, J. / TAYLOR, P. G. (April 2000), Study on the Relationship Between Environmental/Energy Taxation and Employment Creation (University of Bath: Revised Final Report, Prepared for the European Commission: Directorate General XI Contract: B4 - 3040/98/00016/Mar/B1). IERLAND, Ecco C. Van (1993), Macroeconomic Analysis of Environmental Policy, Developments in Environmental Economics: 2 (Amsterdam: Elsevier). JAFFE, Adam B. / PETERSON, Steven R. / PETERSON, Paul R. / STAVINS, Robert N. (March 1995), "Environmental Regulation and the Competitiveness of U.