Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi / 2006 / Cilt: 61 - Sayı: 2

Trade Liberalization and Income Distribution: An Analysis on Developing Countries

Ticari Liberalizasyon ve Gelir Dağılımı: Gelişmekte Olan Ülkeler Üzerine Bir Analiz

Pages
63–87
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results of cross section regression analyses based on the averages of the data belong to the period of 1975-2002 support the Stolper-Samuelson's income distribution hypothesis.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study has examined the relationships between trade liberalization and income distribution in developing countries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:According to Stolper-Samuelson's income distribution theorem that is based on traditional Heckscher-Ohlin model, increasing foreign trade with trade liberalization leads to an increase in the income of the abundant factor, which creates positive effects on income distribution.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results of cross section regression analyses based on the averages of the data belong to the period of 1975-2002 support the Stolper-Samuelson's income distribution hypothesis.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2002 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study has examined the relationships between trade liberalization and income distribution in developing countries. According to Stolper-Samuelson's income distribution theorem that is based on traditional Heckscher-Ohlin model, increasing foreign trade with trade liberalization leads to an increase in the income of the abundant factor, which creates positive effects on income distribution. However, in many studies examining the effects of trade liberalization on income distribution have been also found different results contrary to theoretical expectations. The variation in findings is claimed to be emerged from, in general, the difference between the periods, and facilities of countries that are under question and the econometrical methods, and variables used. In this study, Gini coefficients of developing countries as a scale of income distribution and shares of export and import in GDP as a direct scale of trade liberalization have been used. The results of cross section regression analyses based on the averages of the data belong to the period of 1975-2002 support the Stolper-Samuelson's income distribution hypothesis.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, gelişmekte olan ülkelerde ticari liberalizasyon ile gelir dağılımı arasındaki ilişkiler inceleme konusu yapılmıştır. Geleneksel Heckscher-Ohlin modelinden hareketle geliştirilen Stolper-Samuelson gelir dağılımı teoremine göre, ticari liberalizasyon ile birlikte artan dış ticaret hacmi, ülkelerin bol olarak sahip olduğu faktörün geliri artırmakta, dolayısıyla gelir dağılımı üzerinde olumlu sonuçlar yaratmaktadır. Bununla birlikte, gelir dağılımı üzerine ticaret liberalizasyonunun etkilerini inceleyen birçok uygulamalı çalışmada, teorik temelle örtüşmeyen farklı sonuçlar da elde edilmiştir. Uygulamalı araştırma bulgularındaki bu çeşitliliğin temelinde, genelde ele alman dönem, ülke, ekonometrik yöntem ve değişkenlerdeki farklılıklarından kaynaklandığı ileri sürülebilir. Bu çalışmada da, gelir dağılımının ölçütü olarak gelişmekte olan ülkelere ait Gini katsayıları ile ticari liberalizasyonun doğrudan bir ölçütü olarak ithalat ve ihracat değerlerinin GSYİH içersindeki paylan kullanılmıştır. 1975-2002 dönemi verilerinin ortalamalarına dayanan yatay kesit regresyon analizi sonuçlarının Stolper-Samuelson gelir dağılımı hipotezini desteklediği gözlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEĞER, M. K. (2022). Trade Liberalization and Income Distribution: An Analysis on Developing Countries. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, Cilt: 61 - Sayı: 2, 63–87. https://ajindex.com/articles/443231

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. BALASSA, Bela (1978), "Exports and Economic Growth: Further Evidence," Journal of Development Economics, 5/2: 181 -89. BARRO, Robert (2000), "Inequality and Growth in a Panel of Countries," Journal of Economic Growth, 5 (1): 5-32.
  2. BENSIDOUN, Isabelle/JEAN, Sebastien/SZTULMAN, Aude (2005), "International Trade and Income Distribution: Reconsidering the Evidence," CEPII, Working Paper No. 2005-17. BERG Andrew/KRUGER, Anne (2003), "Trade, Growth, and Poverty: a Selective Survey," IMF Working Paper, Wp/O3/3O. BOURGUIGNON, Francois/MORRISSON, C. (1990), "Income Distribution, Development and Foreign Trade: a Cross-Sectional Analysis," European Economic Review, 34/6:1113-1132.
  3. CALDERON, Cesar/CHONG, Alberto (2001), "External Sector and Income Inequality in Interdependent Economies Using a Dynamic Panel Data Approach," Economics Letters, 71/2:225-231. De LONG J. Bradford /SUMMERS, Lawrence H. (1991), "Equipment Investment and Economic Growth," Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106/2: 445-502.
  4. DEININGER, Klaus/SQUIRE, Lyn (1996), "A New Dataset Measuring Income Inequality," World Bank Economic Review, 10/3: 565-591.
  5. DOLLAR, David/KRAAY, Aart (2002), "Growth is Good for the Poor," Journal of Economic Growth, 7/3: 195-225.
  6. DOLLAR, David (1992), "Outward-Oriented Developing Economies Really Do Grow More Rapidly: Evidence from 95 LDCs, 1976-1985," Economic Development and Cultural Change, 40/3: 523-544.
  7. EDWARD, Anderson (2005), "Openness and Inequality in Developing Countries: a Review of Theory and Recent Evidence," World Development, 33/7: 1045-1063.
  8. EDWARDS, Sebastian (1997), "Trade Policy, Growth and Income Distribution," American Economic Review, 87/2: 205-210.
  9. FEENSTRA, Robert/ HANSON, Gordon (1996), "Foreign Investment, Outsourcing and Relative Wages," in R.FEENSTRA, G. GROSSMAN and D. IRWIN (eds), Political Economy of Trade Policy: Essays in Honor ofJagdish Bhaswati, Cambridge: MIT Press.
  10. FISCHER, Ronald (2001), "The Evolution of Inequality after Trade Liberalisation," Journal of Development Economics, 66/2: 555-579.
  11. GREENAWAY, David/MORGAN, Wyn/WRIGHT, Peter (2002), "Trade Liberalisation and Growth in Developing Countries," Journal of Development Economics, 67/1: 229-44.
  12. HEITGER, Bemhard (1987), "Import Protection and Export Performance: Their Impact on Economic Growth," Weltwirschaftliches Archiv, 260: 1-17.
  13. HIGGINS, Matthew/WILLIAMSON, Jeffrey G. (1999), "Explaining Inequality the World Round:Cohort Size, Kuznets Curves, and Openness," National Bureau of Econo