Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi / 2007 / Cilt: 62 - Sayı: 3

Process of indirect consumer boycott as a non-violence movement and evoluations for Turkey

Şiddet içermeyen bir eylem olarak dolaylı tüketici boykotlarının oluşum süreci ve Türkiye için değerlendirme

Pages
79–100
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Evaluations will also be made in terms of Turkey’s specific conditions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:As a new social movement, consumer boycott can be simply defined as not to make a purchase decision from a company because the consumers are negatively reactive due to company applications or the original country’s administrations.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As consumers are more reactive against to companies than before, number of studies about consumer boycotts is increased in business and marketing literature.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Evaluations will also be made in terms of Turkey’s specific conditions.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

As a new social movement, consumer boycott can be simply defined as not to make a purchase decision from a company because the consumers are negatively reactive due to company applications or the original country’s administrations. As consumers are more reactive against to companies than before, number of studies about consumer boycotts is increased in business and marketing literature. Ethnocentrism, nationalism occurred due to ethnocentric tendencies, patriotism and animosity will be considered as the factors affecting the consumer boycotts. In addition, evaluations of individuals about the success of the boycott, word of mouth communication, necessity of the product class to consumers, possibility to find the substitutes, country of origin and place of production may also be effective in boycott success. In this study, indirect consumer boycotts will be analyzed based on the negative administration of any country or problems occurred between countries. Evaluations will also be made in terms of Turkey’s specific conditions.

Özet

Yeni toplumsal hareketlerin bir türü olarak tüketicilerin bir işletmenin ve/veya bir ülkenin uygulamalarına karşı tepki amaçlı olarak, o işletmenin ve/veya ülkenin ürünlerini almama kararı olarak ifade edilebilecek tüketici boykotları son yıllarda işletme ve pazarlama literatüründe ağırlıklı olarak ele alınmaya başlayan konulardandır. Dolaylı tüketici boykotunun oluşumunda; tüketici etnosantrizmi, etnosatrik eğilimi oluşturan milliyetçilik, vatanseverlik ile düşmanlığın dolaylı boykotun oluşum sürecinde önemli etkilerinin oluğu düşünülmektedir. Bunun yanında bireyin boykotun başarısı konusundaki değerlendirmesi, ağızdan ağıza iletişim ile boykota konu olan ürünün günlük yaşamdaki gerekliliği ve/veya alternatiflerinin bulunabilirliği de boykot kararında etkili olmaktadır. Ayrıca marka ile üretim yeri kökenlerindeki farklılık da boykot kararına etki yapmaktadır. Bu çalışmada iki ülke arasındaki sorunlara veya bir ülkenin uygulamalarına tepki amaçlı olan dolaylı tüketici boykotunun oluşum süreci tartışılarak, Türkiye özelinde konunun değerlendirmesi yapılmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZER, A., BALIKÇIOĞLU, B., KOÇAK, A. (2022). Process of indirect consumer boycott as a non-violence movement and evoluations for Turkey. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, Cilt: 62 - Sayı: 3, 79–100. https://ajindex.com/articles/443169

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. AUSTIN, R. (1994), “A Nation of Thieves’: Securing Black People’s Right to Shop and to Sell in White America, Utah L.R.197. BALABANIS, G./ DIAMANTOPOULOS, A./ MUELLER,.R. D./ MELEWAR, T. C. (2001),
  2. The Impact of Nationalism, Patriotism and Internationalism on Consumer Ethnocentric Tendencies,” Journal of International Business Studies, 32/1: 157-175.
  3. BAUGHN, C.C./ YAPRAK, A. (1996), “Economic Nationalism: Conceptual and Empirical Development,” Political Psychology, 17/4: 759-778.
  4. DJERDJERIAN, T. (2003), “Local and Global Encounters: Politics, Consumption and the Fueling of Grassroots Boycott in Alexandria, Egypt,” A Thesis in The Department of Sociology and Anthropology, (Montreal, Canada: Concordia University). DRUCKMAN, Daniel (1994), “Nationalism, Patriotism and Group Loyalty: A Social Psychological Perspective,” International Studies Quarterly, 38/52: 43-68.
  5. ETTENSON, R./ SMITH, N.C./ KLEIN, J./ JOHN, A. (2006), “Rethinking Consumer Boycotts,” MIT Sloan Management Review (Summer), 47/4: 6-7.
  6. ETTENSON, Richard/ KLEIN, Jil. G. (2005), “The Fallout from French Nuclear Testing in the South Pacific: A Longitudinal Study of Consumer Boycotts,” International Marketing Review, 22/2: 199-224.
  7. FRIEDMAN, M. (1996), “Grassroots Groups Confront the Corporation: Contemporary Strategies in Historical Perspective,” Journal of Social Issues, 51/1: 153- 167. FETTER, F.A. (1911), The Principles of Economics, (New York: the Century Company). FRIEDMAN, M., (1999), Consumer Boycotts: Effecting Change through the Market Place and the Media, London: Routledge. FRITZ, S. (2007), “DaimlerChrysler ‘boşanıyor’,” http://www2.dw-world.de/turkish/wirtschaft/ 1.219226.1.html, 04.04.2007
  8. GARRETT, E.D. (1987), “The Effectiveness of Marketing Policy Boycotts: Environmental Opposition to Marketing,” Journal of Marketing, 51/ April: 46- 57. HAN, C. Min (1988), “The Role of Consumer Patriotism in the Choice of Domestic Versus Foreign Product,” Journal of Advertising Research, 28/3: 25-30. http://www.essentialaction.org/shell/issues.html, 04.04.2007. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahimsa 15.01.2007.
  9. HUDDLESTON, P./ GOOD, L. K./ STOEL, L., (2001), “Consumer Ethnocentrism, Product Necessity and Polish Consumers’ Perceptions Of Quality,” International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 29/5: 236-246.
  10. INNES, R. (2006), “A Theory of Consumer Boycotts under Symmetric Information and Imperfect Competition, The Economic Journal, 116/April: 355–38.
  11. JAVALGI, R. G./ KHARE, V. P./ GROSS, A.C./