SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 64 - Sayı: 3

Wage, pay for performance,and employee perspectives : The case of USA federal level

Ücret,performansa göre ücret ve çalışanların algısı : ABD 'de federal düzey örneği

Hakan DULKADİROĞLU
Selim COŞKUN
Pages
73–95
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the order to evaluate employee perspectives of pay for performance, the study utilizes the 2007 Result Report prepared by semi-legal and the semi-autonomous Merit System Protection Board, which has the responsibility of protecting merit system.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study consists of two parts.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The second part focuses on the study of pay for performance and the employee perception of pay for performance at the federal level in the USA.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the order to evaluate employee perspectives of pay for performance, the study utilizes the 2007 Result Report prepared by semi-legal and the semi-autonomous Merit System Protection Board, which has the responsibility of protecting merit system.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2007 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study consists of two parts. In the first part, the USA public personnel payment system at the Federal level is examined in general and compared with Turkish public personnel payment system. The second part focuses on the study of pay for performance and the employee perception of pay for performance at the federal level in the USA. In the order to evaluate employee perspectives of pay for performance, the study utilizes the 2007 Result Report prepared by semi-legal and the semi-autonomous Merit System Protection Board, which has the responsibility of protecting merit system.

Özet

Bu makale iki kısımdan oluşmaktadır. Birinci kısımda, Amerika Birleşik Devletleri federal ücret sistemi genel hatlarıyla anlatılmış ve ülkemiz kamu personel sistemi ile bazı karşılaştırmalar yapılmıştır. İkinci kısımda ise, ABD'de federal düzeyde, performansa göre ödeme ve performansa göre ödemede çalışan algısı ortaya konulmaya çalışılmıştır. Performansa göre ödemede çalışan algısını değerlendirebilmek için, ABD'de kariyer ve liyakat sistemini korumakla görevli yarı-yargısal, bağımsız bir otorite olan Kariyer ve Liyakat Sistemini Koruma Kurulu'nca (Merit System Protection Board) 2007 yılında hazırlanan sonuç raporu kullanılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

DULKADİROĞLU, H., COŞKUN, S. (2022). Wage, pay for performance,and employee perspectives : The case of USA federal level. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, Cilt: 64 - Sayı: 3, 73–95. https://ajindex.com/articles/443085

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. BAŞBAKANLIK, http://mevzuat.basbakanlik.gov.tr/, 13.07.2008._
  2. BERMAN, Evan M. /BOWMAN, James S./ WEST, Jonathan P./VanWart, Montgomory (2001), Human Resource Management in Public Service: Paradoxes, Processes, and Problems (Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, 1st Edition). BURGESS, Simon/PROPPER, Carol/RATTO Marisa/TOMINEY, Emma (2004), "Incentives in the Public Sector: Evidence from a Government Agency," CMPO Working Paper Series, 04/103. BURKE, T./HAYWARD, D. (2001), "Performance Indicators and Social Housing in Australia," http://www.sisr.net/publications/01burke.pdf (17.07.2008).
  3. COŞKUN, Selim (2005), "AB ve Reform Sürecinde Türk Bürokrasisi: Bir Olay Çalışması," NOHUTÇU, Ahmet/BALCİ, Asım (eds.), Bilgi Çağında Türk Kamu Yönetiminin Yeniden Yapılandırılması-1 (İstanbul: Beta): 299- 330. CPMS (Department of Defense, Civilian Personnel Management Service), http://www.cpms. osd.mil/wage, 01.09.2008.
  4. DALEY, Dennis (2003), "The Trials and Tribulations of Performance Appraisal: Problems and Prospects on Entering the Twenty-First Century," HAYS, Stephen W. /KEARNEY, Richard C. (eds.), Public Personnel Administration: Problems and Prospects (Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall): 154-166. EEOC (U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission), http://www.eeoc.gov/abouteeoc/ 35th/thelaw/civil_service_reform-1978.html, 21.06.2008.
  5. FEDERAL PERSONNEL GUIDE (2007), Your Employee Handbook (Horsham, PA: LRP Publications). KAUHANEN, Antti/PIEKKOLA, Hannu (2004), "What Makes Performance Pay Schemes Work," The - Research Institute of the Economy Discussion Papers, 929. KLINGNER, Donald E./NALBANDIAN, John (2003), Public Personnel Management: Contexts and Strategies (Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 5th Edition). KOHN, A. (1993), "Why Incentive Plans Cannot Work,"Harvard Business Review, 71/5: 54-63.
  6. MARSDEN, David/RICHARDSON, Ray (1992), "Motivation and Performance Related Pay in The Public Sector: A Case Study of the Inland Revenue," Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics, Discussion Paper, 75. MERIT SYSTEM PROTECTION BOARD (2007), "Accomplishing Our Mission: Results of the Merit System Principles Survey 2005," http://www.mspb.gov/netsearch/viewdocs. aspx?docnumber=251283ftversion=251556&application=ACROBAT, 15.03.2008.
  7. MILAKOVICH, Michael E./GORDON, George J. (2004), Public Administration in America (Belmont: Thomson Wadsworth, 8th Edition). O'DONNEL, Micheal/O'BRIEN, John (2000), "Performance- Based Pay in Australian Public Service: Employee Perspectiv