Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 66 - Sayı: 4

From Old to New Neoclassical Synthesis: A Literature Review.

Eskiden Yeniye Neo-Klasik Sentez : Bir Literatür Taraması

Pages
153–184
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study is an attempt to understand the inability of old and the New Neoclassical Syntheses against crises, through main arguments of these two syntheses.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the major theoretical developments in macroeconomics in the last century are summarized.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The crises in the economy in every period have led to questioning of the dominant theory in economics.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study is an attempt to understand the inability of old and the New Neoclassical Syntheses against crises, through main arguments of these two syntheses.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, the major theoretical developments in macroeconomics in the last century are summarized. The crises in the economy in every period have led to questioning of the dominant theory in economics. Following the publication of The General Theory by Keynes, two consensuses which are called old and New Neoclassical Syntheses have been formed. Both syntheses become subject of criticism after structural crises of capitalism. This study is an attempt to understand the inability of old and the New Neoclassical Syntheses against crises, through main arguments of these two syntheses.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, makro iktisatta son yüzyılda oluşan belli başlı teorik gelişmeler özetlenmiştir. Ekonomide yaşanan krizler her dönemde iktisat teorisine hakim anlayışın sorgulanmasına yol açmıştır. Keynes’in Genel Teori’sinin yayımlanmasından günümüze kadar makro iktisatta eski ve yeni Neo-Klasik Sentez olarak adlandırılan iki oydaşma oluşmuştur. Her iki sentez de kapitalizmin yaşadığı yapısal krizler sonrasında eleştiri konusu olmaya başlamışlardır. Bu çalışmanın amacı eski ve yeni Neo-Klasik Sentez’in krizler karşısındaki yetersizliğini, bu iki sentezin ana argümanları üzerinden anlamaya çalışmaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇAKMAKLI, S., ÖZKAN, Ö., YILDIRIM, E. (2022). From Old to New Neoclassical Synthesis: A Literature Review.. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, Cilt: 66 - Sayı: 4, 153–184. https://ajindex.com/articles/443057

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Akyüz, Yılmaz (1980),
  2. Sermaye, Bölüşüm, Büyüme, (Ankara, Ankara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Yayınları, No.453). Allsopp, Christopher ve David Vines (2000), “The Assessment: Macroeconomic Policy”, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 16 (4): 1-32.
  3. Arestis, Philip (2009), “New Consensus Macroeconomics: A Critical Appraisal”, The Levy Economics Institute Working Paper, No: 564. Arestis, Philip ve Malcolm Sawyer (2003), "On The Effectiveness of Monetary Policy And Fiscal Policy," The Levy Economics Institute Working Paper, No. 369, http://www.levyinstitute.org/pubs/wp369.pdf.
  4. Arestis, Philip ve Malcolm Sawyer (2006), “Interest Rates and The Real Economy”, Gnos, Claude ve Louis-Philippe Rochon (eds.), Post Keynesian Principles of Economic Policy (Northampton:Edward-Elgar Publishing). Arestis, Philip ve Malcolm Sawyer (2008), “A Critical Reconsideration of the Foundations of Monetary Policy In The New Consensus Macroeconomics Framework”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 32 (5): 761-779.
  5. Arın, Tülay (1987), “Genel Teori‟nin Ellinci Yılında Keynescilik”, İktisat Dergisi, 268: 3-12.
  6. Backhouse, Roger E. (2008), “Keynesçi Devrim”, Backhouse,Roger E. Ve Bradley W. Bateman (eds), Keynes (Ankara:Dost kitapevi): 28-45.
  7. Beaud, Michel ve Gilles Dostaler (1995), Economic Thought Since Keynes: A History and Dictionary of Major Economists, (Northampton:Edward-Elgar Publishing). Blanchard, Oliver (2000), “What Do We Know About Macroeconomics that Fisher and Wicksell Did Not?”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115 (4): 1375-1409.
  8. Blanchard, Oliver (2008a), "Neoclassical Synthesis" The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, Second Edition,
  9. Durlauf, Steven N. ve Lawrence E. Blume (eds.), Palgrave Macmillan, The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics Online. Palgrave Macmillan. 16 january 2009.
  10. Blanchard, Oliver (2008b), “The State of Macro”, NBER Working Paper, No:14259. Calvo, Guillermo A. (1983), “Staggered Prices in a Utility-Maximizing Framework”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 12 (3): 383-398.
  11. Carlin, Wendy ve David Soskice (2006), Macroeconomics: Imperfections, Institutions, And Policies, (Oxford: Oxford University Press). Cho, Seonghoon ve Antonio Moreno (2006), “A Small-Sample Study of the New-Keynesian Macro Model”, Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 38 (6): 1461-1481.
  12. Clarida, Ricard, Jordi Gali ve Mark Gertler (2000), “Monetary Policy Rules and Macroeconomic Stability: Evidence and Some Theory”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115 (11): 147-180. Dixon