Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 74 - Sayı: 4

International Political Sociology and Security: Global Terrorism, Border Security and Citizenship

ULUSLARARASI SİYASET SOSYOLOJİSİ VE GÜVENLİK: KÜRESEL TERÖRİZM, SINIR GÜVENLİĞİ VE VATANDAŞLIK ÖRNEKLERİ

Pages
1203–1231
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally the conclusion part analyzes the limits of the approach and its contributions to the literature.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:One of the critiques of the traditional ways of understanding International Relations (IR) is that they neglect the social nature of international politics.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Although there have been earlier attempts to analyze international relations from a sociological perspective, the idea that there is much to be gained by engaging with sociology and social theory is mobilized by International Political Sociology (IPS).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally the conclusion part analyzes the limits of the approach and its contributions to the literature.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

One of the critiques of the traditional ways of understanding International Relations (IR) is that they neglect the social nature of international politics. Although there have been earlier attempts to analyze international relations from a sociological perspective, the idea that there is much to be gained by engaging with sociology and social theory is mobilized by International Political Sociology (IPS). The aim of this study is to present a comprehensive account on the theoretical and empirical commitments of international political sociology, and its contributions to security studies. It provides a critical review of the existing literature by first introducing its roots, main methodological and theoretical commitments, and its relationship with security. In the second part, the article presents IPS’s empirical approach towards three main issue areas: global terrorism, border security, and citizenship. Finally the conclusion part analyzes the limits of the approach and its contributions to the literature.

Özet

Uluslararası İlişkiler literatüründeki geleneksel yaklaşımlara yöneltilen en önemli eleştirilerden birtanesi, bu yaklaşımların dünya siyasetinin sosyal doğasını ihmal ettiği üzerinedir. Uluslararası ilişkilerisosyolojik perspektiften incelemek üzere daha önceden önemli girişimlerde bulunulduysa da Uluslararasıİlişkiler disiplinine sosyoloji ve sosyal kuramı entegre etmenin kazançları üzerinde sistematik bir şekilde duranilk yaklaşım Uluslararası Siyaset Sosyolojisi olmuştur. Bu çalışma, Uluslararası Siyaset Sosyolojisiyaklaşımının disipline katkılarını ve bu yaklaşımın güvenlik literatürü ile olan ilişkisini ortaya koymayıhedeflemektedir. Bu amaçla, öncelikle literatürün kapsamlı ve eleştirel bir taramasını yapıp, dayandığıtemelleri, yöntemsel ve kuramsal iddialarını ve güvenlik ile olan ilişkisini ortaya koymaktadır. İkinci olarak,Uluslararası Siyaset Sosyolojisi’nin küresel terörizm, sınır güvenliği ve vatandaşlık konularına yaptığı ampirikkatkıları incelemektedir. Sonuç bölümünde ise, Uluslararası Siyaset Sosyolojisi’nin sınırlarının olup olmadığıve akademik dünyada nasıl bir yankı uyandırdığı ortaya koyulmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARAKAŞ, U., BAYSAL, B., SULA, Ç. L. (2022). International Political Sociology and Security: Global Terrorism, Border Security and Citizenship. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, Cilt: 74 - Sayı: 4, 1203–1231. https://ajindex.com/articles/442890

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Abrahamsen, Rita ve Michael C. Williams (2009), “Security Beyond the State: Global Security Assemblages in International Politics”, International Political Sociology, 3 (1): 1-17.
  2. Ackleson, Jason (2003), “Securing Through Technology? Smart Borders after September 11th. ”, Knowledge, Technology, & Policy, 16 (1): 56-74.
  3. Albert, Mathias ve Barry Buzan (2013), “International Relations Theory and the ‘Social Whole’: Encounters and Gaps Between IR and Sociology”, International Political Sociology, 7(2): 117-135.
  4. Albert, Mathias ve Yosef Lapid (2017), “IBO, IPS and SIP: Engaging the Sociologies of International Relations”, Basaran, Tugba, Didier Bigo, Emmaneul-Pierre Guittet ve R. B. J. Walker (Der.), International Political Sociology: Transversal Lines (Londra ve New York: Routledge): 68-80.
  5. Albert, Mathias, David Jacobsen ve Yosef Lapid (Der.) (2001),
  6. Identities, Borders, Orders: Rethinking International Relations Theory (Minneapolis ve Londra: University of Minnesota Press). Amoore, Louise (2006), “Biometric Borders: Governing Mobilities in the War on Terror”, Political Geography, 25 (3): 336-351.
  7. Andrijasevic, Rutvica ve William Walters (2010), “The International Organization for Migration and the International Government of Borders”, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 28 (6): 977-999.
  8. Aradau, Claudia, Jef Huysmans, Andrew Neal ve Nadine Voelker (2015), “Introducing Critical Security Methods”, Aradau, Claudia, Jef Huysmans, Andrew Neal ve Nadine Voelkner (Der.), Critical Security Methods: New Framework for Analysis (New York: Routledge): 1- 23. Aradau, Claudia ve Jef Huysmans (2013), “Critical methods in International Relations: The politics of techniques, devices and acts”, European Journal of International Relations, 20 (3): 1-24.
  9. Ashley, Richard ve R. B. J. Walker (1990), “Conclusion: Reading Dissidence/Writing the Discipline: Crisis and the Question of Sovereignty in International Studies”, International Studies Quarterly, 34 (3): 367-416.
  10. Ashley, Richard (1984), “The Poverty of Neorealism”, International Organization, 38 (2): 225-286.
  11. Balzacq, Thierry (2005), “The Three Faces of Securitization: Political Agency, Audience and Context”, European Journal of International Relations, 11 (2): 171–201.
  12. Balzacq, Thierry et al. (2010), “Security Practices”, Denemark, Robert A. (Der.), The International Studies Encyclopedia Online (Oxford: Blackwell Publishing): 1-30.
  13. Basaran, Tuğba, Didier Bigo, Emmanuel-Pierre Guittet ve R.B.J Walker (Der.), Interna