Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 75 - Sayı: 3

Probability of Agonistic Democracy for Syria

AGONİSTİK DEMOKRASİNİN SURİYE İÇİN OLASILIKLARI

Pages
1055–1079
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Analyzing the relation between hegemony and agonistic democracy apart from familiar definition of democracy which is used by external powers as means of intervention into States, this study examines the weak and strong aspects of agonistic democracy in the context of a unitary Syria

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Dealing with the resolution of the Syrian crisis, thisstudy examinesthe concept of agonistic democracy which is proposed for Syrian governance and Syrian future.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Taking into account the Syrian social structure and the situation of governance this study analyzes whether the model of agonistic democracy is possible in the context of Syria, as agonistic democracy is proposed for countries including different and decomposed ethnic, religious and sectarian groups.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Analyzing the relation between hegemony and agonistic democracy apart from familiar definition of democracy which is used by external powers as means of intervention into States, this study examines the weak and strong aspects of agonistic democracy in the context of a unitary Syria
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Dealing with the resolution of the Syrian crisis, thisstudy examinesthe concept of agonistic democracy which is proposed for Syrian governance and Syrian future. Taking into account the Syrian social structure and the situation of governance this study analyzes whether the model of agonistic democracy is possible in the context of Syria, as agonistic democracy is proposed for countries including different and decomposed ethnic, religious and sectarian groups. Analyzing the relation between hegemony and agonistic democracy apart from familiar definition of democracy which is used by external powers as means of intervention into States, this study examines the weak and strong aspects of agonistic democracy in the context of a unitary Syria

Özet

Bu çalışmada Suriye krizinin çözülmesi ve Suriye’nin geleceğiyle ilgili önerilen yönetimmodellerinden agonistik demokrasi anlayışı üzerinde durulmuştur. Suriye’nin toplumsal yapısını ve yönetimdurumu ele alan bu çalışma, özellikle farklı dinsel, mezhepsel ve etnik gruplardan oluşan ülkelerde ortak yaşambiçimi olarak önerilen agonistik demokrasi modelinin Suriye bağlamında mümkün olup olmayacağını analizetmektedir. Dış güçler tarafından bir devlete müdahale aracı olarak kullanılan ve bilinen demokrasinin tanımıdışında agonistik demokrasi ile hegemonya ilişkisine değinen bu çalışma, üniter Suriye bağlamında agonsitikdemokrasinin zayıf ve güçlü yönlerini incelemektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

CANYURT, D., DALAR, M. (2022). Probability of Agonistic Democracy for Syria. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, Cilt: 75 - Sayı: 3, 1055–1079. https://ajindex.com/articles/442862

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Asseburg, Muriel ve Wimmen, Heiko (2013), "The Civil War in Syria and The İmpotence of”, https://www.swp-berlin.org/en/publication/the-civil-war-in-syria-and-the-impotence-ofinternational-politics/, (20.12.2016').
  2. Bar, Shmuel (2006), "Bashar’s Syria: The Regime and its Strategic", Comparative Strategy, 25: 353– 445. BBC(2013),http://www.bbc.com/turkce/haberler/2013/03/130315_suriye_aleviler_2, (16.12.2016).
  3. BBC (2016), http://www.bbc.com/ news/world-middle-east-14703856, (16.03.2016).
  4. Bodansky, Yossef (2012), "Syria's Multi-Layered Wars", Defense and Foreign Affairs Strategic Polic, 40(2): 6-8.
  5. Cleveland, L. William (2008), Modern Ortadoğu Tarihi ( İstanbul: Agora Kitaplığı). (Çev. Mehmet Harmancı). Cumhuriyet Gazetesi,(2006).http://www.cumhuriyetarsivi.com/katalog/4926/sayfa/2006/2/27/7.xhtml (9.11.2016).
  6. Dam, Nikolaos Van (1980), "Middle Eastern Political Clichés: Takriti and Sunni Rule in Iraq; Alawi Rule in Syria: A Critical Appraisal",Orient, 21(1): 42-57.
  7. Dam, Nikolaos Van (2000), Suriye’de İktidar Mücadelesi (İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları). DiSalvo, Carl (2010).
  8. Design, Democracy and Agonistic Pluralism. Proceedings of the Design Research Society Conference. Montreal. Esad, Beşar (2011). Interview With Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. (W. Journal, Röportaj Yapan). Gürson, Poyraz (2010), Suriye (Ankara: Atılım Üniversitesi Yayınları). Haddam, Abdülhalim (2011). Abdülhalim Haddam Hürriyet’e konuştu. (M. Elveren, Röportaj Yapan). Hasan, Ziyad (2012). 2012 Suriye Söyleşileri. (O. Orhan, Röportaj Yapan) Ortadoğu Stratejik Araştırmalar Merkezi. Ankara.
  9. Hinnebusch, Raymond (2011), "The Ba'th Party in Post-Ba'thist Syria: President, Party and the Struggle for Reform",Middle East Critique, 20(2): 109-125.
  10. Hitti, K. Philip (1959),Syria: A Short History (New York: The Macmillan Company). Hopwood, Derek (1988), Syria 1945-1986: Politics and Society (London: Taylor & Francis Group). Hussein, Louay (2015). Syria Pulse. (S. M. Drwish, Röportaj Yapan) Al Monitor. İshakoğlu, Ömer (2012), Suriye Tarihi: Osmanlı Dönemi Suriyesi'nde Edebi ve Kültürel Hayat (1800- 1918) (İstanbul: Kabalcı Yayıncılık). Kanatlı, Mehmet (2014),“Chantal Mouffe’un Radikal Demokrasi Projesi Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme”, Tesam Akademi Dergisi, 1(2), s. 115-135.
  11. Karal, E. Ziya (2007),Osmanlı Tarihi. V. Cilt 5(Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Yayınları). Keyman, Fuat (1999),Türkiye ve Radikal Demokrasi (İstanbul: Bağlam Yayınları). Kılınçkaya, M. Derviş (2004),Osmanlı Yönetimindeki Topraklarda Arap Mil