SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi / 2006 / Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 2

Perceptions of Preservice Teachers About the Use of Electronic Portfolios for Evaluation

Öğretmen Adaylarının Değerlendirme İçin Elektronik Portfolyo Kullanımına İlişkin Görüşleri

Yasemin GÜLBAHAR
Filiz KÖSE
Pages
75–93
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed that the evaluated method is favored by students and found to be suitable and helpful for a lesson, where students are engaged in project based teaching.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This research study investigates the effects of using electronic portfolios in prospective teacher education for evaluation purposes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:After that, perceptions of students (N=14) is elicited.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed that the evaluated method is favored by students and found to be suitable and helpful for a lesson, where students are engaged in project based teaching.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This research study investigates the effects of using electronic portfolios in prospective teacher education for evaluation purposes. E-portfolio evaluation method is used in an undergraduate lesson in which the project-based teaching is implemented. After that, perceptions of students (N=14) is elicited. The results showed that the evaluated method is favored by students and found to be suitable and helpful for a lesson, where students are engaged in project based teaching. Furthermore, thoughts on various beneficiaries of e-portfolio evaluation method from the point of students are also discussed.

Özet

Bu çalışma,öğretmen adaylarının eğitiminde değerlendirme amacıyla elektronik portfolyoların kullanılmasının etkilerini araştırmak amacıyla yapılmıştır. Lisans düzeyinde proje tabanlı olarak işlenen bir derste e-portfolyo değerlendirme yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Daha sonra öğrencilerin (N=14) bu yönteme ilişkin görüşleri alınmıştır. Veriler nitel yöntemlerle analiz edilmiştir. Sonuçlar bu değerlendirme yönteminin öğrenciler tarafından çok benimsendiğini ve proje tabanlı öğretim yöntemi ile işlenen bir dersin değerlendirilmesi için uygun ve yararlı olabileceğini göstermiştir. Ayrıca, e-portfolyo değerlendirme yönteminin öğrenciler açısından farklı yararlar sağladığına ilişkin görüşler de tartışılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜLBAHAR, Y., KÖSE, F. (2022). Perceptions of Preservice Teachers About the Use of Electronic Portfolios for Evaluation. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 2, 75–93. https://ajindex.com/articles/442703

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Ahn, J. (2004). Electronic Portfolies: Blending Technology, Accountability & Assessment. T.H.E. Journal, 31(9), 12, 16,18. Akpınar, Y., Bal, V. & Şimşek, H. (2005). E-Portfolyolarla Öğrenme Ortamı Geliştirme ve Destekleme Platformu. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology - TOJET. 4(4), Article 15. [Online]: http://www.tojet.net/articles/4415.doc adresinden 14.7.2006 tarihinde indirilmiştir. Barrett, H. C. (2001). “Electronic portfolios.” In educational technology an encyclopedia. [Online]: Retrieved on 31-July-2006, at URL: http://electronicportfolios.com/portfolios/encyclopediaentry.htm
  2. Barrett, H. C. (2005). “White Paper: Researching Electronic Portfolios and Learner Engagement.” [Online]: Retrieved on 7-August-2006, at URL: http://www.taskstream.com/reflect/whitepaper.pdf
  3. Carliner, S. (2005a). E-Portfolios. Training & Development, 59(5), 70-75.
  4. Carliner, S. (2005b). Commentary: Assessing the Current Status of Electronic Portfolios. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 31(3). [Online]: Retrieved on 12-August-2006, at URL: http://www.cjlt.ca/content/vol31.3/.
  5. Corcoran, C. A., Dershimer, E. L. & Tichenor, M. S. (2004). A teacher’s guide to alternative assessment taking the first steps. The Clearing House, 77(5), 213-216.
  6. Corwin, T. (2003). Electronic portfolios. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 20(1), 32-38.
  7. Frank, M. & Barzilai, A. (2004). Integrating alternative assessment in a project-based learning course for pre-service science and technology teachers. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29 (1), 41-61.
  8. Garthwait, A. & Verrill, J. (2003). E-portfolios: Documenting student progress. Science and Children, 40(8), 22-27.
  9. Gülbahar, Y. & Tinmaz, H. (2006). Implementing Project-Based Learning and E-Portfolio Assessment in an Undergraduate Course. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(3), 309-327.
  10. Hewett, S. M. (2004). Electronic Portfolios: Improving Instructional Practices. TechTrends, 48(5), 26-30.
  11. Irby, B. & Brown, G. (2000). The career advancement portfolio. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  12. Lynch, L. L. & Purnawarman, P. (2004). Electronic portfolio assessments in U.S. educational and instructional technology programs: Are they supporting teacher education?. TechTrends, 48(1), 50-56.
  13. Mason, R., Pegler, C. & Weller, M. (2004). E-portfolios: An assessment tool for online courses. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(6), 717-727.
  14. Milman, N. B. & Kilbane, C. R. (2005). Digital teaching portfolios: Catalysts