SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi / 2008 / Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 1

The Early Intervention Programs Based on Home Visits for Supporting the Child & Parent and the Effects of These Programs

Çocuk ve Aileyi Desteklemeye Yönelik Ev Ziyaretlerine Dayalı Erken Müdahale Programları ve Programların Etkileri

Hülya KARTAL
Pages
1–28
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study was intended to introduce the early prevention and intervention programs which are based on home visits and to investigate the assumed positive effects of them on children and parents.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Prevention and early intervention programs are thought to eliminate the negative effects of biological and environmental conditions and to provide more positive developmental circumstances.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the long term, these programs cause to higher education and income levels, and they lessen the rates of crime.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study was intended to introduce the early prevention and intervention programs which are based on home visits and to investigate the assumed positive effects of them on children and parents.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Prevention and early intervention programs are thought to eliminate the negative effects of biological and environmental conditions and to provide more positive developmental circumstances. The studies related to the effects of early prevention and early intervention programs revealed that this kind of support have positive influences on the school success of children on the short term. In the long term, these programs cause to higher education and income levels, and they lessen the rates of crime. In other words these programs advance the socio economic level of the individuals and as a result of this they contribute to the social development. This study was intended to introduce the early prevention and intervention programs which are based on home visits and to investigate the assumed positive effects of them on children and parents.

Özet

Önleme ve erken müdahale programları, biyolojik ve çevresel olumsuzlukların etkisinin ortadan kaldırılabileceğinin ve çocuklara daha iyi gelişme olanağının sunulabileceğinin ispatı olarak görülmektedir. Araştırmalar, yaşamın ilk yıllarında bireye verilen desteğin kısa vadede bireyin okul başarısı ve eğitimini daha üst basamaklara kadar sürdürmesinin yanı sıra uzun dönemde ise eğitim düzeyinin yükselmesi ve gelir düzeyinin artmasına, suç işleme oranlarının azalmasına, başka bir deyişle bireyin sosyoekonomik düzeyinin yükselmesine ve bunun sonucu olarak da toplumsal kalkınmaya katkıda bulunduğunu göstermektedir. Bu çalışmada fiziksel ve toplumsal çevrenin çocuk ve ebeveyn üzerindeki olumsuz etkilerini en aza indirerek koruyucu faktörlerin işler kılınmasının amaçlandığı önleme ve erken müdahale programlarından ev ziyaretine dayalı programlar ve bunların çocuk ve aileler üzerindeki etkileri değerlendirilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARTAL, H. (2022). The Early Intervention Programs Based on Home Visits for Supporting the Child & Parent and the Effects of These Programs. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 1, 1–28. https://ajindex.com/articles/442690

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Aksu-Koç, A., Bekman, S., & Erguvanlı-Taylan, E. (2004). Güneydoğu Anadolu Bölgesi’nde bir erken müdahale modeli: Yaz anaokulu pilot uygulaması, Boğaziçi Üniversitesi ve Anne-Çocuk Eğitim Vakfı. [Online]: http://www.acev.org/arastirma/arastirma adresinden 19 Nisan 2004 tarihinde indirilmiştir. Barnett, W.S. (1995). Long-term Effects of Early Childhood Programs on Cognitive and School Outcomes. The Future of Children, 5(3), 25-50. [Online]:Retrieved on 05-June-2003, at URL: http://www.futureofchildren.org/usr_doc/vol5 no3ART2.pdf. Barnett, W.S. & Hustedt, J.T. (2003).
  2. Preschool the most important grade, The first years of school, ASCD for the Success of Each Learner, Publications Educational Leadership, 60(7), 54-57. [Online]: Retrieved on 01 September 2004, at URL: http://www.ascd.org/publications/ed_lead/200304/barnett.html
  3. Bekman, S. (1998). Eşit Fırsat (Anne Çocuk Eğitim Programı'nın Değerlendirilmesi), Anne-Çocuk Eğitim Vakfı Yay., İstanbul.
  4. Bekman, S., Sucuka, N. & Özdemir, A. (2003). Güneydoğu Anadolu Bölgesi için Anne Destek Programı, AÇEV Yayınları,
  5. İstanbul.
  6. Benasich, A.A. & Brooks-Gunn, J. (1996). Maternal attitudes and knowledge of child-rearing: Associations with family and child outcomes. Child Development, 67(3), 1186-1205
  7. Brooks-Gunn, J., Liaw, F. & Klebanov, P.K. (1992). Effects of early intervention on cognitive function of low birth weight preterm infants. Journal of Pediatrics, 120, 350-359.
  8. Brookes-Gunn, J., Berlin, L.J. & Fuligni, A.S. (2000). Early childhood intervention programs: what about the family? In Shonkoff, J.P. & Meisels, S.J. (Eds.), Handbook of early childhood intervention (2nd ed., pp.549-588): New York: Camridge University Press.
  9. Campbell, F.A. & Ramey, C.T. (1994). Effects of Early Intervention on Intellectual and Academic Achievement: A follow-up study of children from low-income families, Child Development, 65(2), 684-698.
  10. Dawson, P., van Doorninck, W.J. & Robinson, J.L. (1989). Effects of home-based informal social support on child health. Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 10(2), 63-67.
  11. Gomby, D.S., Culross, P.L. & Behrman, R.E. (1999). Home Visiting: Recent Program Evaluations-Analysis and Recommendations, The Future of Children, 9(1), 4-26.
  12. Gray, S.W. & Ramsey, B.K. (1982). The Early Training Project: A life-span view. Human Development, 25(1), 48-57.
  13. Hawkins, J.D., Catalano, R.F., & Arthur, M. (2002). Promoting science-based prevention in communities. Addictive Behaviors, 90(5):1–26.
  14. Honig, A.S. & Lally, J.