SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2002 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 2

The effectiveness of two dimensional Edgewise technique for maintaining of lower incisor anchorage

Alt kesici ankrajını korumada "İki boyutlu Edgewise tekniği" nin etkinliği

Aynur ARAS
Hakan BULUT
Pages
121–126
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study demonstrated that two dimensional edgewise technique provides sufficient intraoral anchorage with minimal lower incisor retraction.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of the present study was to investigate cephalometrically the effectiveness of two dimensional edgewise technique in order to maintain the lower incisor anchorage in minimal anchorage cases where lower first premolars are extracted.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study was undertaken on 15 individuals having normal or slightly increased overjet, requiring moderate or maximum anchorage on maxilla and minimum anchorage on mandibula.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study demonstrated that two dimensional edgewise technique provides sufficient intraoral anchorage with minimal lower incisor retraction.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate cephalometrically the effectiveness of two dimensional edgewise technique in order to maintain the lower incisor anchorage in minimal anchorage cases where lower first premolars are extracted. This study was undertaken on 15 individuals having normal or slightly increased overjet, requiring moderate or maximum anchorage on maxilla and minimum anchorage on mandibula. The data obtained from cephalometric radiographs immediately before closure and after closure of first premolar extraction space was evaluated statistically. This study demonstrated that two dimensional edgewise technique provides sufficient intraoral anchorage with minimal lower incisor retraction.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, birinci premolar dişlerin çekildiği mandibular minimum ankraj vakalarında, iki boyutlu edgewise tekniği ile alt kesici ankrajının ne derece korunabildiğinin sefalometrik olarak araştırılmasıdır. Araştırma; tedavileri alt çenede minimum, üst çenede moderate ile maksimum ankraj olarak planlanan, normal veya hafifçe artmış overjete sahip 15 birey üzerinde yürütülmüştür. Birinci premolar çekim boşluğunun kapatılma öncesi ve hemen sonrası alınan lateral sefalometrik radyografiler istatistiksel olarak değerlendirilmiştir. Bu çalışma iki boyutlu edgewise tekniğinin alt kesicilerde minimal retraksiyon ile yeterli intraoral ankrajı sağlayabileceğini ortaya koymuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

ARAS, A., BULUT, H. (2022). The effectiveness of two dimensional Edgewise technique for maintaining of lower incisor anchorage. Ankara Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 2, 121–126. https://ajindex.com/articles/442302

References (16)

  1. Graber TM. Orthodontics principles and practice. WB Saunders Company, Philadelphia, 1968, pp.521-6 2. Hixon EH, Atikian H, Callow GE, McDonald HW, Tacy RJ. Optimal force, differential force, and anchor- age. Am J Orthod 1969
  2. 56 3. Higley LB. Anchorage in orthodontics. Am J Orthod 1969
  3. 4 4. B aker RW, Guay AH, Peterson HW. Current concepts of anchorage management. Angle Orthod 1972
  4. 38 5. Ülgen M. Ortodontik tedavi prensipleri. Ankara Üniversitesi, Ankara, pp. 400-16,464-70,1990. 6. Proffit WR, Fields HW. Contemporary orthodontics. C.V. Mosby Company, St. Louis, 1986
  5. p.260 7. Marcotte MR. Biomechanics in orthodontics. B.C. Decker, Inc., Toronto, 1990
  6. pp.35-37, 144 8. Burstone CJ, van Stienbergen E, Hanley KJ. Modern edgewise mechanics and the segmented arch tech- nique. Glendora (CA), Ormco Corp., 1995
  7. pp. 50-63 9. Mulligan TF. Common sense mechanics. Phoenix: CSM, 1982 10. Nasiopoulos AT, Taft L, Greenberg SN. A cephalo- metric study of Class II, Division 1 treatment using differential torque mechanics. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1992
  8. 80 11. Mulligan TF. Clinical considerations in extraction therapy. In: Nanda R (ed). Biomechanics in clinical orthodontics. WB Saunders Company, Philadelphia, 1997
  9. pp.218-228 12. Hart A, Taft L, Greenberg SN. The effectiveness of differential moments in establishing and maintaining anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1992
  10. 42 13. Nanda R, Kuhlberg A. Biomechanics basis of extrac- tion space closure. In: Nanda R (ed). Biomechanics in clinical orthodontics. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp.156-87,1997 14. Braun S, Sjursen RC, Legan HL. On the management of extraction sites. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1997
  11. 55 15. Tosun Y. Sabit ortodontik apareylerin biyomekanik prensipleri. Ege Üniversitesi Basımevi, İzmir, pp. 221-30, 1999 16. Hocevar RA. Orthodontic force systems: Individualized treatment with open-minded "Begg" technique. Am J Orthod 1982
  12. 91 17. Gianelly AA, Bednar JR, Dietz VS. A bidimensional edgewise technique. J Clin Orthod 1985
  13. 21 18. Thompson WJ. Combination anchorage technique: An update of current mechanics. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1988
  14. 79 19. Kesling CK. The tip-edge concept: Eliminating unnecessary anchorage strain. J Clin Orthod 1992
  15. 76 20. Gianelly AA, Smith JB, Bednar JR, Dietz VS. Asymmetric space closure. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1986
  16. 41 21. Schudy FF, Schudy GF. The bimetric system. Am J Orthod 19