Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2002 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 3

Evaluation of bonding between the teeth and microwave versus conventional denture base resin with different surface treatments

Mikrodalga akrili ve konvansiyonel akriliklerin kaide-diş bağlantısının farklı yüzey uygulamaları ile değerlendirilmesi

Pages
299–304
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results indicated that microwave acrylics displayed better tooth-denture base bonding than conventional acrylics.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of different surface treatments on the ridge lap surface of the teeth by grinding or applying monomer, on two kinds of acrylic base materials (microwaveable and conventional acrylics).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Group 1: Grinding and applying monomer Group 2: Monomer application only Group 3: Grinding only Group 4: Control A total of 40 premolar teeth were placed in cylindric wax and divided into groups of 5.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results indicated that microwave acrylics displayed better tooth-denture base bonding than conventional acrylics.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of different surface treatments on the ridge lap surface of the teeth by grinding or applying monomer, on two kinds of acrylic base materials (microwaveable and conventional acrylics). There is no consensus about the different surface treatments on the shear bond strength of the teeth and denture base materials. In order to evaluate this contraversy, different surface treatments were used in this study. Group 1: Grinding and applying monomer Group 2: Monomer application only Group 3: Grinding only Group 4: Control A total of 40 premolar teeth were placed in cylindric wax and divided into groups of 5. They were then polymerized by using microwave and conventional base acrylics. Following a storage of 48 hours in tap water, the samples were placed on the test machine in order to evaluate the shear bond strength of the different groups. The load was applied and the samples were fractured. The data were evaluated statistically according to Kruskal Wallis and Multiple Comparison tests. The results indicated that microwave acrylics displayed better tooth-denture base bonding than conventional acrylics. The monomer application gave better results for bonding of the tooth and base material than the other groups. Also the grinding procedure for microwave specimens, increased the bonding strength.

Özet

Günümüzde hala tam olarak açıklığa kavuşmamış olan akrilik kaide ve diş bağlantısının incelenmesinin hedeflendiği bu çalışmada, mikrodalga akriliği ve konvansiyonel akril olmak üzere iki farklı kaide akrilinin, tek tip diş kullanarak, farklı yüzey uygulamalarının makaslama bağlantı direncini nasıl etkilediği araştırılmıştır. Farklı yüzey uygulamaları: Grup 1: Aşındırılmış ve monomer uygulanmış Grup 2: Yalnızca monomer uygulanmış Grup 3: Yalnızca aşındırılmış Grup 4: Hiçbir işlem uygulanmamış (Kontrol) 40 adet premolar diş silindir şeklindeki mum örneklere yerleştirilmiş ve daha sonra 5'erli gruplar halinde yukarıdaki işlemler uygulanarak, mikrodalga akrili ve konvansiyonel akril kullanılarak polimerizasyonları gerçekleştirilmiştir. Tesviye işlemlerini takiben 48 saat suda bekletilen örnekler, makaslama bağlantı direncinin belirlenmesi amacıyla test cihazına yerleştirilerek, kırılmışlardır. Elde edilen sonuçlar Kruskal Wallis ve çoklu karşılaştırma yöntemleri kullanılarak istatistiksel olarak değerlendirilmiştir. Sonuç olarak, mikrodalga ve konvansiyonel akriliklerin karşılaştırılmasında, mikrodalga ile hazırlanan örneklerde, dişlerle bağlantının çok daha güçlü olduğu bulunmuştur. Ayrıca monomer uygulamanın, her iki grup akrilde de faydalı olacağı ve mikrodalga örneklerinde aşındırmanın da bağlantı direncini arttırdığı tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TERZİOĞLU, H., KESKİN, Y., AKÖREN, A. C. (2022). Evaluation of bonding between the teeth and microwave versus conventional denture base resin with different surface treatments. Ankara Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 3, 299–304. https://ajindex.com/articles/442293

References (17)

  1. Cunningham JL. Shear bond strength of resin teeth to heat-cured and light-cured denture base resin. J Oral Rehabil 2000; 27: 312-316
  2. Thean HPY, Chew C, Goh KI. Shear bond strength of denture teeth to base: A comparative study. Quintessence Int 1996; 27: 425-428
  3. El-Sheikh M, Powers JM. Tensile bond strength of porcelain teeth to denture resin before and after aging. Int J Prosthodont 1998; 11: 16-20
  4. Cardash HS, Liberman R, Helft M. The effect of retention grooves in acrylic resin teeth on tooth denture-base bond. J Prosthet Dent 1986; 55: 526-528
  5. Clancy JMS, Boyer DB. Comparative bond strengths of light-cured, heat-cured, and autopolymerizing denture resins to denture teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 61: 457-462
  6. Barpal D, Curtis DA, Finzen F, Perry J, Gansky S A. Failure load of acrylic resin denture teeth bonded to high impact acrylic resins. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 80: 666-671
  7. Morrow RM, Matvias FM, Windeler AS, Fuchs RJ. Bonding of plastic teeth to heat-curing den- ture base resins. J Prosthet Dent 1978; 39: 565- 568
  8. Can G, Kansu G. Plastik dişler ile protez kaide materyalinin bağlanma dayanıklılığı. AÜ Diş Hek Fak Derg 1990; 17: 97-101
  9. Catterlin RK, Plummer KD, Gulley ME. Effect of tinfoil substitute contamination on adhesion of resin denture tooth to its denture base. J Prosthet Dent 1993; 69: 57-59
  10. Cunningham JL, Benington IC. An investiga¬ tion of the variables which may affect the bond between plastic teeth and denture base resin. J Dent 1999; 27: 129-135
  11. Vallittu PK, Ruyter IE. The swelling phenome- non of acrylic resin polymer teeth at the inter- face with denture base polymers. J Prosthet Dent 1997; 78: 194-199
  12. Keskin Y. Farklı yöntemlerle polimerizasyonu sağlanan akriliklerin bazı fiziksel özelliklerinin karşılaştırmalı olarak değerlendirilmesi. Doktora Tezi; Ankara 1993
  13. Polyzois GL, Dahi JE. Bonding of synthetic resin teeth to microwave or heat activated den- ture base resin. Eur J Prosthodont Rest Dent 1993; 2: 41-44
  14. Keskin Y, Akören AC. Farklı yöntemlere polimerize edilen akrilik rezinlerin pörözite açısından karşılaştırılması.AÜ Diş hek Fak Derg 1998; 25: 299-305
  15. Yunus N, Harrison A, Huggett R. Effect of microwave irradiation on the flexural strength and residuel monomer levels of an acrylic resin repair material. J Oral Rehabil 1994; 21: 641- 648
  16. De Clerck JP. Microwave polymerization of acrylic resins used in dental prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1987; 57: 650-659
  17. Cunningha