SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2004 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 1

One year clinical performance of direct composite veneer restorations

Direkt kompozit veneer tekniği ile yapılan restorasyonların bir yıllık klinik takibi

Arzu MÜJDECİ
Yıldırım Hakan BAĞIŞ
Pages
19–25
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed the presence of statistically significant differences among groups (P

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of the study was to evaluate the esthetic performance of direct composite veneer restorations for one year.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 86 restorations were made by same dentist by using Valux Plus composite resin (3M Dental Products, St Paul, USA).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed the presence of statistically significant differences among groups (P
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the esthetic performance of direct composite veneer restorations for one year. Twenty-eight patients (twelve men, sixteen women) were participated in this study. A total of 86 restorations were made by same dentist by using Valux Plus composite resin (3M Dental Products, St Paul, USA). The restorations were finished and polished according to the manufacturer's directions. The restorations were evaluated at baseline, and after 1,3,6 months and one year later by three dentists using the United States Public Service (USPHS) criteria. The obtained data were statistically analyzed using the Khi-Square test and Fisher's Exact Test. The results showed the presence of statistically significant differences among groups (P

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, direkt kompozit veneer restorasyonların 1 yıllık estetik performansını değerlendirmekti. 28 hasta (12 erkek, 16 kadın) bu çalışmaya katıldı. Toplam 86 restorasyon Valux Plus kompozit rezin kullanılarak aynı hekim tarafından yapıldı. Restorasyonlar üreticisinin tavsiyesine göre bitirildi ve cilalandı. Restorasyonlar hemen ve 1,3,6 ve 12 ay sonunda USPHS kriterleri kullanılarak 3 hekim tarafından değerlendirildi. Elde edilen veriler Khikare testi ve Fisher's Exact Test ile istatistiksel olarak değerlendirildi. Sonuçlar, gruplar arasında istatistiksel olarak önemli farklılıklar olduğunu gösterdi, incelenen gruplar arasında istatistiksel farklılıklar olsa da, 1 yıl sonunda sadece 1 vakada restorasyonun rengi restorasyonsuz dişe göre kötü olarak saptandı. Genel olarak tüm restorasyonlar başarılı bulundu.

🔖

Cite This Article

MÜJDECİ, A., BAĞIŞ, Y. H. (2022). One year clinical performance of direct composite veneer restorations. Ankara Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 1, 19–25. https://ajindex.com/articles/442235

References (18)

  1. Baratieri LN, Monteiro S, de Andrada MAC, Arcari GH. Composite resin veneers:a new technique. Quintessence Int 1992; 23: 237-43
  2. Meijering AC, Creugers NHJ, Mulder J, Roeters FJM. Treatment times for three different types of veneer restorations. J Dent 1995; 23:21-6
  3. Robins WJ. Color characterization of porcelain veneers. Quintessence Int 1991; 22: 853-6
  4. Baratieri LN, Monteiro S, de Andrada MAC. Esthetics-direct adhesive restorations on fractured anterior teeth. Chicago: Quintessence, 1995
  5. Golstein RE. Survey of patient attitudes toward current esthetic procedures. J Prosthet Dent 1984; 52: 775-80
  6. Felippe LA, Baratieri LN. Direct resin composite veneers: masking the dark prepared enamel surface. Quintessence Int 2000; 31: 557-62
  7. Ronk SL. Dental lamination: clinical problems and solutions. JADA 1992; 104: 844-6
  8. Meijering AC, Roeters FJM; Mulder J, Creugers NHJ. Patients' satisfaction with different types of veneer restorations. J Dent 1997; 25: 493-7
  9. Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P. The 5-year clinical performance of direct composite additions to correct tooth form and position. Clin Oral Invest 1997; 1: 12-8. 10. van Dijken JWV. A clinical evaluation of anterior conventional, micro filler and hybrid composite resin fillings. Acta Odontol Scand 1986;44:357-367
  10. Asmussen E. Factors affecting the color stabilityof restorative resins. Acta Odontol Scand 1983;41:1-18
  11. Um CM, Ruyter IE. Staining of resin based veneering materials with coffee and tea. Quintessence Int 1991; 22: 377-86
  12. Asmussen E, Hansen EK. Surface discoloration of restorative resins in relation to surface softening and oral hygiene. Scand J Dent Res 1986; 94: 174-7
  13. Tyas MJ. The class V lesion-aetiology and restoration. Aust Dent J 1995; 40: 167-70
  14. Sidhu SK, Watson TF. Resin modified glass ionomer materials. A status report for the American Journal of Dentistry. Am J Dent 1995; 8: 59-67
  15. Hachia Y, Iwaku M, Hosoda H, Fusayama T. Relation of finish to discoloration of composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 1984; 52: 811-4
  16. Heymann HO, Bayne SC, Sluder TB, Wilder AD. 3 year clinical trial of hybrid versus microhybrid class IV composites. J Dent Res 1993; 72:380 (Anst 2217)
  17. Powell LV, Gordon GE, Johnson GH. Clinical evaluation of direct esthetic restorations in cervical abrasion/erosion lesions: one year results. Quintessence Int 1991; 22: 687-92
  18. Folwaczny M, Loher C, Mehl A, Kunzelmann KH, Hinkel R. Tooth-colored filling ma