SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ankara Medical Journal / 2014 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 4

Our colonoscopy experiences for rectal hemorrhages in our endoscopy department of general surgery

Genel cerrahi endoskopi ünitemizdeki rektal kanamalarda kolonoskopi deneyimlerimiz

Muzaffer ÇAPAR
Sezar KARACA
Ahmet Serdar KARACA
Rıdvan ALİ
Pages
151–155
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Of these patients, these anomalieswere respectively found; hemorrhoidal disease in 456 (58%), colon or rectal polyps, in 149 (19%) diverticular diseasein 86 (11%), colon or rectum tumor in 62 (8%), inflammatory bowel disease in 23 (3%) and colonoscopic examinationwere normal 11 patients.Conclusion: We suggest that colonoscopy is an important examination, because rectal bleeding and bleeding lesionscan be seen with the naked eye and also histopathological diagnosis can be ensured when malignancy is suspected.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: Our aim was to evaluate the outcomes of the colonoscopy patients in which colonoscopy was carried outbecause of rectal bleeding.Materials and Methods: Between January 2008 and June 2012, the results of 2356 patients who underwent electivecolonoscopy were analyzed retrospectively. 787 patients were identified as rectal bleeding.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Histopathologicalexamination results of the patients who underwent polypectomy and biopsy were evaluated.Results: 787 (33.2%) of the 2356 patients undergoing elective colonoscopy within 4 years were admitted with rectalbleeding. 787 patients presented with rectal bleeding were evaluated retrospectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Of these patients, these anomalieswere respectively found; hemorrhoidal disease in 456 (58%), colon or rectal polyps, in 149 (19%) diverticular diseasein 86 (11%), colon or rectum tumor in 62 (8%), inflammatory bowel disease in 23 (3%) and colonoscopic examinationwere normal 11 patients.Conclusion: We suggest that colonoscopy is an important examination, because rectal bleeding and bleeding lesionscan be seen with the naked eye and also histopathological diagnosis can be ensured when malignancy is suspected.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: Our aim was to evaluate the outcomes of the colonoscopy patients in which colonoscopy was carried outbecause of rectal bleeding.Materials and Methods: Between January 2008 and June 2012, the results of 2356 patients who underwent electivecolonoscopy were analyzed retrospectively. 787 patients were identified as rectal bleeding. Histopathologicalexamination results of the patients who underwent polypectomy and biopsy were evaluated.Results: 787 (33.2%) of the 2356 patients undergoing elective colonoscopy within 4 years were admitted with rectalbleeding. 787 patients presented with rectal bleeding were evaluated retrospectively. Of these patients, these anomalieswere respectively found; hemorrhoidal disease in 456 (58%), colon or rectal polyps, in 149 (19%) diverticular diseasein 86 (11%), colon or rectum tumor in 62 (8%), inflammatory bowel disease in 23 (3%) and colonoscopic examinationwere normal 11 patients.Conclusion: We suggest that colonoscopy is an important examination, because rectal bleeding and bleeding lesionscan be seen with the naked eye and also histopathological diagnosis can be ensured when malignancy is suspected.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada rektal kanama nedeniyle kolonoskopi yaptığımız hastaların sonuçlarını değerlendirmekamaçlanmıştır.Materyal ve Metod: Ocak 2008 Haziran 2012 tarihleri arasında elektif kolonoskopi yapılmış olan 2356 hastanınsonuçları retrospektif olarak incelendi. Bunların içerisinde 787 adet rektal kanamalı hasta olduğu belirlendi.Polipektomi ve biyopsi yapılan hastaların histopatolojik inceleme sonuçları da değerlendirmeye alındı. Bulgular: 4 yıl içinde elektif kolonoskopik inceleme yapılan 2356 hastanın 787si (%33.2) rektal kanama nedeniylemüracaat etmişti.. Rektal kanama nedeniyle başvuran 787 hasta retrospektif olarak değerlendirildi. Bu hastaların456sında (%58). hemoroidal hastalık, 149sında (%19) kolon veya rektumda polip, 86sında (%11) divertiküler hastalık,62sinde (%8) kolon veya rektum tümörü, 23ünde (%3) inflamatuvar barsak hastalığı, 11 hastada ise kolonoskopikinceleme normal bulundu. Sonuç: Kolonoskopinin, rektal kanamalarda, hem kanayan lezyonun gözle görülebilmesine olanak sağlaması, hem demalignite şüphesi olan olgularda histopatolojik tanının sağlanabilmesi avantajlarını içermesinden dolayı önemli birtetkik olduğunu düşünmekteyiz.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇAPAR, M., KARACA, S., KARACA, A. S., ALİ, R. (2022). Our colonoscopy experiences for rectal hemorrhages in our endoscopy department of general surgery. Ankara Medical Journal, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 4, 151–155. https://ajindex.com/articles/442184

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Waye JD. Diagnostic endoscopy in lower intestinal bleeding. In Sugawa C, Schuman BM, Lucas CE, eds. Gastrointestinal bleeding New York: Igaku Shoin Medical Publishers 1992 14(2):30-41
  2. Farrell JJ, Friedman LS. Gastrointestinal bleeding in the elderly. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2001;30 (2):377-407
  3. Lieberman DA, Weiss DG, Bond JH, et al. Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group 380. N Engl J Med 2000;343(3):162-168
  4. Williams NS. Colorectal cancer: Epidemiology, aetiology, pathology, clinical features and diagnosis. In: Surgery of the Anus, Rectum and Colon, Williams NS, Keighley MR(Eds). Oxford: WB Saunderss Company;1993;29(3):830-886
  5. Lieberman DA, Smith FW: Frequency of isolated proximal colonic polyps among patients referred for colonoscopy. Arch Intern Med 1988;148 (2):473-475
  6. Wolff BG,James WF, Beck DE et al (Eds). The ASCRS Textbook of Colon and Rectal Surgery In: Forde KA, Nivatvongs S. Diagnostic Evaluations _Endoscopy: Rigid,Flexible Complications. New York: Springer;2007;43(4): 57-68
  7. Fijten GH, Blijham GH, Knottnernus JA. Occurens and clinical signification of overt bloodloss per rectum in the general population and medical practice.Br J Gen Pract 1994; 44(384): 320-325
  8. Helfland M, Marton KI, Zimmer-Gembeck MJ, Sox HC. History of visible rectal bleeding in a primary care population. İnitial assesment an 10-year follow-up. Jama 1997; 277(1):44-48
  9. Dent OF, Goulstone KJ, Tennant CC et al. Rectal bleeding: patient delay in presentation. Dis Colon Rectum 1990; 33(10):851-857
  10. Sànchez A, Munoz C, Bujanda L et al. The value of colonoscopy to ases rectal bleeding in patients referred from primary Care Units. Revista Espanola de Enfermedades Digestivas (Madrid) 2005; 97 (12): 870-876
  11. Sıddıque I, Mohan K, Hasan K et al. Appropriateness of indication and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: first report based on the 2000 guideliness of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. World Journal of Gastroenterology 2005;11(44):7007-7013
  12. Metcalf JV, Smith J, Jones R,Record CO. İncidence and causes of rectal bleeding in general practice as detected by colonoscopy.British Journal of General Practice 1996,46(404):161-164
  13. Jensen DM, Machicado GA. Diagnosis and treatment of severe hematochezia. The role of urgent colonoscopy after purge. Gastroenterology 1988;95(6):1569-1574
  14. Church JM. Analysis of the colonoscopic findings in patients